Leadership is a character’s unique way of guiding their follower’s in an attempt to make their country better than the previous leader’s attempted to. The leader is striving to make accomplishments and uphold the promise’s they handed out to the follower’s in effort to be loved and respected. There are various leadership styles and each one can be analyzed by the leader’s character traits and method’s. In history, when you study previous president’s or even military leader’s you will see the repetitive nature of the leader trying to control by enforcing rules and regulations for the citizens to abide by. When the leaders fail to make their followers happy by mistaking control for respect the followers tend to fight back and the leader begins to lose control …show more content…
Julius Caesar was not an exception when it came to losing his follower’s admiration. However, it was not his citizens who turned on him but the ones he trusted the most. Julius Caesar was loved by many and hated by most. In this statement, his follower’s respected and genuinely cared but his army that was suppose to stand behind him was envious of his power and control. The only way they are able to take the power is to stab Julius Caesar to death and claim Rome for new empire. It took about sixty men to overpower Julius Caesar in a cowardly way by blindsiding the ruler in a viscous and glory manner. Not one man that day had the courage to ask Julius to a challenge because each individual knew Julius would win given his past history. Julius survived war, slavery, and even the civil war. (
“Assassination of Julius Caesar.”
Wikipedia
, Wikimedia
Foundation, 19 Mar. 2018,
A good leader is measured by the ability to inspire, gives back to his people, and true leaders are humble and show humility. Julius Caesar had all these qualities and so much more to offer to the empire of Rome. The conspirator attempted to downgrade Caesar image, and for a short time they succeeded; however, with the help of Antony, the people then realized what they had lost. Julius Caesar was a good leader no matter what the conspirators said.
Was Julius Caesar really as bad as people say he is? I believe that Julius Caesar was in fact a hero to the roman republic. Julius Caesar was a hero because he took the time to make a calendar for the people, rebuild cities, and took care of the poor.
Julius Caesar was a good man, beloved by his country. He was a good ruler and had expanded Rome by a lot. He made himself the dictator for life. He died at the hands of his fellow senators, and one of his best friends Brutus. Mark Antony, a son like figure to Caesar, will be taking charge of Rome. He will be missed by all, long live the great Julius
With the death of Julius Caesar, Augustus became the leader of Julius' great conquests, resources, and soldiers. Immense power was his to seize. However, the power came at a cost. At the forefront of his attention, Julius' killers were still loose, sewing seeds of violent oppression to this authority. Combined with this constant fear of revolt, the propaganda of Marc Antony and others further challenged his right to rule. Therefore, for Augustus to command the absolute power bestowed upon him, he must eliminate any threats by any means necessary. This took the form of massacre.
Julius Caesar a man who made history, and a man who should get credit for the incredible things he’s done. I believe, Julius Caesar, should get the statue because he was an active leader by expanding the Roman Empire, he accomplished things that others wouldn’t dare to do and he also ruled many lands.
Julius Caesar was not a powerful leader. Julius Caesar was always wanting help from other people. Caesar thought he was a good leader but nobody liked him. He was always using other people to do his jobs, and he needed others to pick him up because he was not strong enough to do the job by himself. Caesar was only liked by very few people because of the stuff he did.
“If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.” - John Quincy Adams. Julius Caesar was a great leader who saw the need to change ways of ruling, in order to meet the needs of an empire rather than a city-state. Julius helped out the poor, was a great leader in military,and expanded the rome empire. Therefore Julius was a great leader saw the need of change ways of ruling.
During the ages of the Roman Empire the ruler, Julius Caesar has proved to have the qualities to be an effective leader by showing his capability and determination in getting whatever he desired, no matter the cost. Caesar showed his capability of all the power he had. Caesar also showed his determination by to get anything done, and nothing would get in his way.
A Selfish Leader “Leadership is action not position” (Donald H. McGannon). Leaders have to do what is right for the congregation of people they are leading. They should not do what makes themselves look higher up. Julius Caesar; in ways, expressed actions that were not for the good of the city of Rome. However, his primary concern was what was best for himself.
Julius Caesar was undoubtedly a man who changed history. His life and its story have inspired generations of awe and scrupulous study. Many would argue he is the most influential man in recorded history. However, can the great Caesar truly be declared a ‘event-making man’, according to the criteria of the Great Man Theory? Did he truly influence the course of history through his own extraordinary acts of will and leadership? Or was he simply a fortunate man who appeared in the right place at the right time, being only the pawn of a greater scheme? By following and exploring the political ideals and abilities of Caesar, as well as his military ability and prowess, this essay hopes to clearly
John Maxwell once said, “People buy into the leader before they buy into the vision.” What is a leader? A leader is one who knows the way, shows the way, and goes the way. Qualities of a good leader require courage, charisma, strength, knowledge and wisdom, good morals and power. All of these qualities of leadership boil down to what is known as integrity. Integrity is doing what is morally correct; it requires honesty, making the “right” decisions for the community, taking the blame, and being selfless. A good leader should possess all these qualities in order to be capable of leading and gaining respect from others. Cassius was set at such a high place of being a leader, but Brutus proved he would’ve been a better fit for the title.
The basic premise for leadership is the process of influencing other people to follow your lead in order to accomplish a goal. It is about the relationship between the leader and the followers. A good leader tries to motivate people to bring about positive changes revealing a common objective without using coercion or manipulation. Leadership is not about control, but permitting interaction and communication between the leader and the individual followers. With empowering others, leaders build a foundation of collaborative thinking and encourage an atmosphere of personal involvement; a leader can strengthen the respect and loyalty of his or her followers. Leaders can affect this process by applying their own personal characteristics, such
According to Daft (2008, p.20) leadership typically reflects the larger society, and theories have evolved as norms, attitudes, and understandings in the larger world of change. Throughout the centuries leaders have adapted in response to these changes. Northouse (2007, p3) defines leadership as a process whereby an individual influences a group of individuals to achieve a common goal. A person’s ability to
Leadership is something that people are born with. It is an inherent charm and it doesn’t hide even if you want to hide it. There is a leader amongst us and he or she is the one that leads other people to great things by inspiring and motivating people to do good deeds. Leadership has been described as “a process of social influence in which one person can enlist the aid and support of others in the accomplishment of a common task”. This way a leader can decide what work goes in and goes out. Good leaders in history have left a mark in walks of life. But great leaders, they’re different. Great leaders have the ability to make each and every individual re-think their life decisions and choices by
There are certain traits that make someone a great leader. Said traits range from valiance or courage, not being easily dissuaded or deterred. These attributes can almost guarantee success in any environment, such as a government or in a military standpoint. Therefore if one lacks in these traits, failure is tantamount for not only themselves, but also the ones under their leadership. In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, the character Brutus portrays this situation almost perfectly. In the tragedy, it plays out the events leading to Julius’ death, the assassination itself, and the following turmoil. In the beginning, the original leader of the assassination, Cassius, tries tirelessly to persuade Brutus to understand the misdeeds and shortcomings