Lenin used many different means to attempt to make his Communist ideal work in Russia. He, effectively, utilised propaganda, pragmatism and a certain amount of good luck to keep his reign secure, and also to make sure that it was likely to stay secure for a good many years to come. His pragmatism was shown in his quick change of economic policy after the Kronstadt mutiny, even though it meant him turning away from the basic tenets of the Communist idea. The fact that Communism actually lasted until the late 1980s show that his initial work in establishing it was, by definition, successful.
One of the things that made Lenin such a successful leader of Communism was the fact that he was able to change his ideas to suit what he needed to do with
Vladimir Lenin was important in the development as well as introduction of The New Economic Policy which achieved much. Peasants became satisfied with their ability to gain a small amount of profit from their hard work and harvests. It brought an awaited solution to
In the 1915s the Western countries had advanced technologies, a better economy and were managed successfully. However, Russia was trying something new, Communism. Lenin believed that Communism would make the country better. Shortly after his death, the man of steal, otherwise known as Stalin took control. He claimed to have the same ambitions; create a strong army, build up the industrial strength in a socialist society (Kreis, 2012). Despite their similar goals the actions they took to achieve them were completely different; Lenin is known to be on of the greatest leaders of Russia and Stalin the worst.
Lenin was truly a Marxist. He supported Karl Marx and his views so much that he became incredibly knowledgeable about it. Marx's ideas about communism influenced Vladimir to start the revolution and start his own communist country. Although it says “In Russia we must now devote ourselves to the construction of a proletarian socialist state. Long live the socialist world revolution”, he's actually creating a communist revolution. In the fourth paragraph of Lenin's speech he says, “ But in order to end this war, which is closely bound up
Lenin's solution was a revolutionary vanguard party that would come not from the peasantry or proletariat, but from the bourgeoisie and be composed of mainly middle class intellectuals. (Strangely enough he seemed to fit this criteria quite snuggly!) This party, he postulated, would have to be a small, closely knit, highly centralized, highly disciplined, conspiratorial and quasi-military organization of professional
Lenin defined his movement by the slogan “all power to the soviets” Lenin believed he could make a new revolution in a way the old one happened by starting large street demonstrations. The soviets were giving lenin little support, but lenin believed he could manipulate them for his own purposes. Lenin tried to sieve power for the bolsheviks
Lenin, knowing Russia’s economic status quo and having to get ready for an upcoming civil war, had to stop the war against Germany no matter the cost. Thus having persuaded Trotsky and Kamanev, supporters of the war, in 1918, the treaty of Brest-Litovsk was accepted. However this came with high sacrificial value. Due to the treaty, Russia lost Riga, Lithuania, Estonia and parts of White Russia. This was a heavy blow to the already weakened economy as these areas were of major importance since they were some of the most fertile farming lands in Russia, while additionally losing 75% of their iron ore and coal deposit. Thus one could see the Brest-Litovsk treaty as an unsuccessful move by Lenin as the loss of economical important lands was a major downfall. However it has to be taken into account that the people of Russia wanted an end to the war and despite the loss, it did help Lenin in winning the civil war in Russia. Thus, Lenin was successful to a large extent in stopping the war but yet again, this was not the only war he would be fighting.
Upon the creation of the USSR, Lenin introduced new rule that would ensure greater totalitarian control. Only communists would be able to stand for the soviets, and so this meant that the communist party had the true control over the
A final point that supports the statement of Lenin consolidating his power due to the weakness of his opponents was due to the fact that Lenin had good leadership qualities. An example of this would be that the Bolsheviks were highly disciplined party that was fiercely loyal to Lenin and was also a politically astute man. Lenin was able to adapt Marxism to fit the changing situation, keeping Bolshevik support and popularising the parties polices. Furthermore, another advantage was that radical parties were very popular in Russia before the October Revolution and Lenin was skilfully able to take some of the
only had the firm support of 15 of 25 members on the 15th of October.
Placing revolution above party unity, Lenin would accept no unity compromise if he thought it might delay, not accelerate the revolution. This makes it quite apparent that without Lenin; there may have not been a revolution. He clearly pushed its commencement.
Vladimir Lenin Led what was known as the October revolution, and, therefore, is worthy of study. Vladimir Lenin was viewed as “ the greatest revolutionary leader and thinker since Marx.” Link*. Lenin helped form new economic views for Russia, even though there were some who did not agree with him, those who did however, joined him in the revolt. Lenin's views were influenced by several different things, including, “the execution of his elder brother, a member of a revolutionary group.” Link* . Vladimir Lenin was exposed to radical thinking while he was at university, and was later expelled due to his views. Also due to his political views he was arrested and exiled from St. Petersburg to Serbia. Given these points, Vladimir lenin is worthy
and outcome . . . in both cases, the pressing need for urban-based revolutionary leaderships to build state organizations powerful enough to defeat domestic counterrevolutionaries and foreign enemies meant that the Revolutions gave rise to more centralized and bureaucratic regimes” (Skocpol 233-234). Russia was a state that was very much peasant based, and the peasants were themselves never fully for the revolution or possible to control. The peasants were not the only ones who were causing slow progress and potential counterrevolution however, within the parties themselves there were prevalent issues. Lenin himself realized this when originally structuring his party, that any truly unorganized, open, and free socialist party would lead to
Lenin died. Lenin had a pragmatic and realistic approach to problems. He was able to ‘seize the moment’ which was vital in the Bolsheviks gaining power. His organisation and leadership of the Bolshevik party transformed it. When Lenin died in January 1924 he had nominated Leon Trotsky as his chosen successor.
In the beginning Communism seemed to the people of Russia as a utopian ideal. The promise of the elimination of classes, of guaranteed employment, "The creation of a comprehensive social security and welfare system for all citizens that would end the misery of workers once and for all." Lenin's own interpretation of the Marxian critique was that to achieve Communism there would first have to be a socialist dictatorship to first suppress any dissent or protest. Through coercive tactics this new government seized power and in 1917 Lenin came to power. Under his "rule" Russia underwent radical changes in it's economic doctrines adopting a mixed which was termed the New Economic Policy, also referred to as NEP. This
The Revolution did not meet its goals in that it was supposed to not be similar to the Tzar, yet Lenin found himself in an extremely similar position. “‘What enviable blindness…what propertied classes when they’ve long been abolished by the sense of previous decrees?’”(Pasternak 453). Lenin came to have total power, with no one