preview

Who Is Meursault's Irony In Albert Camus The Outsider

Decent Essays
Open Document

Albert Camus’ novel The Stranger follows the life of M. Meursault, a sales clerk in 1940’s Algiers, from the death of his mother to his execution. Meursault, throughout the novel, embodies Camus’s absurdist philosophies: he disregards emotion, speaks his mind, and seems apathetic about his life. Meursault’s apathy is unusual, and thus, according to the incongruity theory of humor, is funny for most readers. As the theory states, however, Meursault’s apathy is only funny to the reader that does not expect it, and thus the humor in the book only applies to a sect of the readers. Yet the themes of rejection and hopelessness in the book appeal to all readers and diminish the humor in the novel. Camus’ essay The Myth of Sisyphus furthers the idea …show more content…

In The Stranger the courtroom symbolizes society’s viewpoints. The jury represent society’s viewpoints; the judge echoes “the verdict returned by the jury”; the prosecutor seeks to impart society’s views on Meursault (86). In the trial itself, the prosecutor aims to demean Meursault’s character and slander him for “[not wanting] to see Maman, [not crying] once” and “the day after his mother’s death, [going] out swimming, starting up a dubious liaison, and going to a comedy, for laughs.” (91, 94) This, to some readers, appears to be an unexpected (and thus funny) strategy: instead of focusing on Meursault’s thoughts and actions prior to the murder the prosecutor focuses on a series of unrelated actions surrounding his mother’s death. The humor in this scene also only applies to those readers who both understand the legal system and consider the prosecutor's strategy unusual. Ultimately, Meursault is not convicted for his actions on the beach but “of burying his mother with crime in his heart.” (96) The trial, however, symbolizes society’s attempts to rationalize and connect everything. Because Meursault does not connect with society’s arbitrary patterns, he is shunned from society. Meursault’s trial may seem funny on first glance, but further analysis reveals that it is in fact society rejecting the nonconformist. Thus, the humor in the scene is diminished by the seriousness of Camus’ …show more content…

While waiting for his trial, a chaplain shoves a cross in Meursault’s face and asks “Do you know what this is?” (68) Meursault asserts his atheism and thus rejects religion. The humor in this scene stems both from Meursault’s character and the chaplain’s conviction to convert Meursault. First, Meursault is easily distracted and his comments are unexpected, and, following the incongruity theory, are funny. While the chaplain is yelling at Meursault, Meursault says “[it was] hard to follow [the chaplain’s] reasoning because it was hot and big flies kept landing on my face.” (68) Second, the chaplain is determined to reveal Meursault’s “[belief] in God”; thus, Meursault’s continual rejection of the God, according to the relief theory, is funny (69). The crucifix, in the scene, symbolizes more than christianity: it represents the afterlife and the search for a higher being, values that are deeply ingrained in society. Thus, Meursault’s rejection of the crucifix, which aligns well with Camus’ absurdism, serves as a shunning of hope for a better life in the moment and an afterlife. In his essay, The Myth of Sisyphus, Camus’ exemplifies his point from The Stranger by saying that “the whole being is exerted toward accomplishing nothing.” (1) The hopelessness and meaningless nature that both The Myth of Sisyphus and The Stranger identify cannot, and does not, make for “comic” or even “humorous” material; the big philosophical questions

Get Access