Who Is Sanger Rainsford Guilty Of Murder?

Zaroff was different than Rainsford in some ways. Zaroff believes the world is made up of two groups, the strong and the weak. In his mind, he thought the strong should rule over the weak. He believed he was the strong and wanted to rule over the weak. In his mind, he thought that he should be able to use his vast skills in hunting. Unlike Rainsford, Zaroff used his accelerated experience in hunting an unjust way by hunting other humans when he didn’t have to. But in the end karma came around and bit him in the butt when Rainsford killed

In accordance to the Penal Law, Murder in the first degree is defined “With intent to cause the death of another person, he causes the death of such person… the victim was killed while the defendant was in the course of committing / attempting to commit in furtherance of robbery [or other such felonies.]{§125.27(1)(a)(vii)}” This is also known as

First-degree murder is the only crime in which the death penalty can be imposed, consisting of premeditated, deliberate intent to kill murders, and felony murders. First-degree has to be willfully committed meaning the intent to kill, purposely, knowingly, and at common law a specific intent. In this degree atrocious means wicked, cruel, or brutal and heinous means hateful. They are important terms that help define the punishment. First-degree murder

There are three main “degrees of murder.” There is third-degree murder, which is a little more complicated than the other two. When people do not meet the standards for first-degree, or second-degree, murder they are usually classified in this category. A third-degree murder is a murder that is not premeditated. The next level up is second-degree murder. This degree is classified as an intended, but not premeditated, murder. The highest degree is first-degree murder. This is an intended and well thought out plan to murder somebody. Being charged with this degree is saying that you thought about how you were going to seek out and kill your victim. People who are guilty of first-degree murder could be tried for the death penalty. This is

Rainsford thought what Zarroff did was murder, not hunt. “Hunting? Good God, General Zaroff, what you speak of is murder.” (Connell 34). Rainsford was repealed by the fact that general kills humans for fun. Rainsford was shocked that Rainsford kills humans. Rainsford was stating that he was not a murderer he was a hunter. “Thank you, I'm a hunter, not a murderer.” (Connell 34). He'd rather be himself (a hunter) instead of like him(a murderer). Rainsford was shown all the human heads taken by Zarroff. “I want to show you my collection of heads. Will you come to me to the library?” “I hope said rainsford, “that you will excuse me tonight, general zaroff. I’m really not feeling at all well” (Connell 29). Rainsford doesn't like his ways so he wouldn’t want to be like him. Rainsford does not want to be like general Zarroff because the human heads Zarroff had disgusted

Is Rainsfords deed Justifiable? In the short story, “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, Rainsford is justified in his actions of kill General Zaroff due to the General's death is justifiable in behalf of the state of duress that Rainsford is in at the time. Secondly, Rainsford’s actions are justifiable as a result of the rescue of Rainsford’s life, the lives of the sailors in the basement, and the lives of future people who will come to the island. Lastly, murder of the general by Rainsford is justifiable because the murder is an act in self defense.

Rainsford responds by saying, “‘Hunting? Great Guns, General Zaroff, what you speak of is murder’” (Connell 12). Rainsford confronts Zaroff about his game he has created and tells him that it’s murder, and nothing but murder, to go hunt people like that.

Sanger Rainsford, shows this very clearly as he takes the life of General Zaroff. He showed how cruel and barbaric General Zaroff really was. Before Rainsford thought he had found a fellow hunter until ‘“ Hunting? Good God, General Zaroff, what you speak of is murder.”’ (63).

In the story “The Most Dangerous Game” Rainsford was just fied in killing the General. Rainsford really didn’t mean to kill him it was only self-dense in which it lead to him killing the general. If Rainsford would have never killed him it would have been the other way around.

In the short story, "The Most Dangerous Game", Rainsford was justified in the killing of General Zaroff. Rainsford was an animal hunter on his way to Rio, that fell off his yacht. He swam to Ship-Trap island and he met Ivan and General Zaroff. General Zaroff let Mr. Rainsford stay in his mansion and he provided food and clothing. As Rainsford got to know General Zaroff. he found out General Zaroff trap men on the island to hunt them like they are animals.

In, the short story, “The most Dangerous Game”, Rainsford kills General Zaroff. Some readers believe Rainsford has the right to eliminate Zaroff. Others believe that no human being should be killed under no circumstance but most people believe that Rainsford had a right to kill Zaroff because Zaroff killed many people in the past and tried to kill Rainsford in the process when Rainsford washed up onto shipwreck island and hunted him down for two ish daies which zaroff calls his murder his dangerous game. For instance“That would be barbarous. I treat these visitors with every consideration. They got plenty of good food and exercise. They get into splendid physical condition” (Connell 5). After all, this quotation means That general Zaroff is

He cares and doesn't want any lifes to be taken by this gruesome game, including his own. Right before the two hunters partake in the “game”, Rainsford attempts to close with, “Thank you, I’m a hunter, Not a murderer” (Connell, 4). This is stating that he doesn't want to turn into what General Zaroff has become, a murderer. He only takes pleasure in hunting animals, and he directly states this.

I think that Rainsford choose to confront Zaroff in the end, rather than ambush him because he knows that doing that would be wrong. Rainsford is an honorable man who was sucked into Zaroff's game through the unfortunate events that surrounded his arrival on the island. Though Zaroff's game is one that involves murder, he, too, is a man of his word, and he plays the game according to the rules he has established. Rainsford's desire for revenge also seems to have overwhelmed the sense of fair play and humanity which he displayed earlier in the story when he called Zaroff's human hunt an act of murder. Rainsford is not a murderer, and ambushing Zaroff would be just that. Rainsford decides to allow Zaroff to play the game in order to give him

Firstly, Rainsford and Zaroff differ in their personal hunting styles or in what they hunt. In fact, Zaroff hunts people. Rainsford once said to Zaroff “Hunting? Good God, General Zaroff, what you speak of is murder” (Connell 64). This shows that Rainsford is proving to the audience that Zaroff is a murderer not a hunter.

“Anybody is a killer, all you gotta do is push ‘em to the limits.” -J.Cole