Who Trumps Nature Or Nurture?

One of the oldest debates in psychology is nature versus nurture. Nature is the inborn, innate character of an organism. (Spencer A. Rathus pg. 56) Nurture is the sum total of the environmental factors that affect an organism from conception onward. (Spencer A. Rathus pg. 56) Basically nature is what you have from heredity and nurture is you environmental influences.

Nature Vs Nurture is often the huge debate in psychology when it comes to determining and understanding individual’s characteristics traits. Nature is hereditary to our behavior while nurture is based on our environmental influences. Although most argue whether or not nature or nurture defines our characteristics, I believe both have an impact on we are.

Nature or Nurture. Nature may be all of the genes and hereditary factors with which influence them to become who they are such as physical appearances and personality characteristics. Nurturing impacts people’s lives as well as how they are raised and all the environmental factors. In combination, these qualities can be the true identity of oneself. Many people may argue that nurture appears to a play huge factor in the two, but others may think otherwise. Not having both as a characteristic can have a negative effect on a person physically and mentally. The debate of nature versus nurture appears to be the oldest argument known to man, and it still remains to be unanswered. In the old-age argument nature versus nurture, nature may play a huge role in determining a person’s true identity.

Everybody has different opinions on the Nature vs Nurture term. Some say we are who we are based on who we surround ourselves with, and others say we are who we are from birth. I know there are many different theories for both sides and they make sense scientifically but, I'm going to explain I am who I am from social construction to myself and how I make choices from my own beliefs.

Susan Evers and Sharon McKendrick, the famous identical twins from the movie The Parent Trap, were separated at a young age by their divorcing parents. Sharon grew up in Boston to a socialite mother while Susan grew up in California on her father’s ranch. Sharon had structure while Susan’s life was very laid back. They looked the same and liked many of the same things, yet their personalities were very different. What is responsible for these differences? Is it simply that they are two different people with different interests and preferences? Or did the environments that they grew up in play a part in making who they are? In the nature vs. nurture controversy, nature proclaims that our genetic make-up plays the primary role in human

A prime example that personality and behavioral patterns are based on nature is alcoholism and drug abuse. Popular belief is that if your parent is an alcoholic or drug addict, you will become an addict too. Yes, people who are the children of alcoholics “are at [an] increased risk” of using drugs or abusing alcohol along with “behavioral and emotional

Both nature and nurture interplay to determine personality characteristics. Nature is heredity and passed on at conception. Nurture is that which is environmentally developed. It is innate that a baby will crawl, but he needs the support of his environment (diet, etc.) if he is to ultimately survive. Our behaviour is the result of a combination of inborn traits and the situations in which we find ourselves. There are five categorise which help influence personality differences. Genetically, offspring tend to take on some of the characteristics of their parents. However, this could be due to long term exposure to the personalities of their parents rather than their genetic coding. Whether a person is male or female determines what gender role they take on. ‘Women are expected to be nurturing, attractive, emotional, weak, and subordinate to men; whereas, men are the strong, rational, objective, and financial providers’ (Loue and Sajatovic, 2007). Ones family experiences can also influence a person’s behaviour. Family experiences like: ‘family size, birth order, differential parental orientations towards children’ etc. will impact on the emergence of personality as well as a person’s suitability to leadership roles (Morley and Moore et al., 2004, pp. 28-52). Culture plays a very strong role in determining what is believed to be acceptable and unacceptable

There is a common argument between what influences someones personality; nature or nurture? Nature is defined as “the inborn, innate character of an organism.”(Rathus 56) Nurture is defined as “the sum total of the environmental factors that affect an organism from conception onward.”(Rathus 56) Well in my own life, I have reason to believe that they both played a major role in my development but I believe that nurture had more of a role than nature did. I feel like certain parts of my nurture had more influence than other parts did such as my parents. I also believe that I was born with my own opinion on what is right and what is wrong but as I’ve became older, I feel like my nurture or my environment has conformed my morals to the world we

Studies have shown that nurture is more dominant Determine personality than Nature is. Like feral children they were left alone if they were raised by dogs/wolfs they would walk on all fours they would have sharper eyesight,hearing and smell they also learned from study that monkeys if both boys or both girls can raise a

In the argument of nature versus nurture, there are two sides. But I believe that there is a middle ground, where nature and nurture work together, though there are many fine points to make on the argument of nurture over nature, and of nature over nurture. I hope to cover all sides and clearly explain my point to you. I believe that your environment and your nature as a human are both important in your personality. On one side where you come from has a big impact on who you will be.

Have you ever wondered why you act the way you do? Many people have spent their lives researching the important debate on whether parenting or genetics play the biggest role on the way people act today. Both nature and nurture play a big part in shaping someone's personality. Identical twins are different in many ways. My letters ESFP have changed a lot throughout my lifetime. Studies have shown that nurture is more dominant in a person’s personality than nature. In most cases nurture has a stronger influence on someone’s personality than nature does.

Nature combines with nurture to form our personalities. Our genes may predispose us for certain inheritable traits such as diseases like cystic fibrosis or even just irritability, similar to our relatives, but the environment we are raised in has quite a bit to do with how visible certain aspects of our personality become. If a child is always around an environment where there is constant arguing and yelling going on, the child may naturally feel that is the proper thing to do when things do not go as they would like. Likewise, genetics play a role in determining a person's body type, thus you could get your eye color from your mom, and your height from your dad.

Nature is the individual’s inheritance while nurture is an individual 's experiences within the environment around oneself. Nature and nurture both help influence behaviors and personalities. With that being said, I believe that temperaments, behaviors, and personalities are mostly developed by nurture instead of nature. I personally feel like genetics are more physical and less psychological. Aggression, anxiety, and many other emotional traits can be affected on how an individual acts, but I think that nurture overrides that and teaches them how to deal with those traits, which would result to behavior. I strongly feel that my personality was more influenced by nurture rather than nature because I think people act by previous experiences and emotions rather just naturally knowing what to do and how to act. I can relate this topic to myself and dance. I have to be at practice in order to know the moves and techniques of the dance. I can’t just show up at state, go on the floor, and expect to know the routine and what to do since my mother was a dancer too. I personally

To sum it up, scientists have learned that humans become who they are based on nature and nurture. Nature is the term referring to human development of the genetic codes you inherit. It states that you develop your personality, height, weight, level of intelligence, as well as various other traits through genetics. Nurture refers to humans learning their behavior and personality traits after conception through external factors. Becoming who you are through nurture would mean that you learn from experiences throughout life as well from the way your peers influence you. After conducting research on the nature versus nurture theory, it is reasonable to assume that we develop into the humans we are more so through the nurture method part of the theory, but

For more than a century, researchers and psychologists, such as Sir Francis Galton, Charles Darwin, Sigmund Freud and many others, have been trying to understand how people are transformed by their environment. Researchers have mainly argued whether it is in fact our environment or rather genetics, our biological pre-wiring, which has influenced human behavior. This concept ultimately facilitated what is now known as the Nature versus Nurture debate. The Nature aspect states that human behavior is predetermined by our inherited genes or is the product of our innate behavior. The Nurture side of the disagreement postulates that human behavior stems from acquired attributes through individual learning and experiences. Correspondingly, the Object Relations Theory in psychoanalytic psychology supports the position that a person’s natural environment (i.e. family, peers, acquaintances, society) forms human development. The Object Relations theory stresses that it is the relationships between people, more specially family, often between mother and child, that crafts the human psyche.