Who Was Downe Trying To Convince His Wife Analysis

Times were difficult in Habersham County. The skyrocketing prices of fuel and food were threatening to bankrupt the Johnson family’s small farm, which was no match for the multi-million-dollar mega-farms that had been popping up all over the southeast. Joseph, the family patriarch, was especially troubled by the farm’s

Throughout the poem the speaker mentions things that relate to consumerism in America. An example in the poem that speaks about consumerism comes from lines 1-4

In John Downe’s nineteenth century letter to his wife, he cries for his English family to come converge with him in the United States. Downe employs multiple rhetorical devices throughout his message in order to persuade his spouse to follow in his footsteps. He enters his qualification through a narrative lense and describes his profoundly improved experience in the States. Recounting an exaggerated, favorable encounter with a farmer, he states “...I was welcome to come to his house at any time; they had on the table pudding, pyes... and everything that a person could wish...” (8-12). He conveys an innocent, amazed tone while discussing the striking differences between the behavior of where he originated, and where he has now found himself. The new businessman then provides a rich description of the benefits bestowed upon him in the U.S., indicating a lack of those [benefits] where his family now resides. Providing a solution for his family’s financial deficit, he lists: “...a barrel of cider holding 32 gallons, for 4s.... 100 lbs. Beef for 10 s.... Lamb is about five farthings the pound...” (16-20). Through the heavy use of examples and an educated diction, Downe’s claims serve to reassure his wife of the guaranteed

In addition, Steinbeck utilizes symbolism to help reveal his message to the audience. In this chapter, the putrefying crops that resulted from the system’s agricultural mismanagement represent the landowner’s greed, and how it is responsible for not only the

“When you got to the table you couldn 't go right to eating, but you had to wait for the widow to tuck down her head and grumble a little over the victuals, though there warn 't really anything the matter with them, -- that is, nothing only everything was cooked by itself. In a barrel of odds and ends it is different; things get mixed up, and the juice kind of swaps around, and the things go better.” (Twain, 1)

As I said before, I grew up in a middle class family. This made it difficult for me to completely understand everything that he was talking about in the book. I never knew what it was like to have little or no food to eat. If we didn’t have anything to eat our family would go to a restaurant and eat or go shopping and get food.

In California during the Great Depression, Lennie Small and George Milton are two ranch workers going from job to job with the dream of saving enough money to purchase their own land to “live on the fatta the land”. As events unfold in the novel, George, Lennie, and other characters such as Candy and crooks reveal how their own hopes and

In Yusef Komunyakaa’s “Blackberries,” a youthful speaker seems to be living past the boundaries of city life and exhibits qualities of rural living. The poem tells of the speaker’s adventure of picking blackberries from a thicket and encountering the duality of urban society. Readers of “Blackberries” might at first be puzzled by the speaker’s youthful memory of picking berries, but a closer analysis of the poem allows readers to recognize that the speaker’s internal conflict originates from strict societal boundaries and the loss of his childhood innocence.

He also talks about how we should just close the doors and were fine the way we are but of course during WW I and II, the United States recruited thousands of temporary workers from Mexico to harvest the crops. We had labor short farms and we needed other countries to come help us with workers.

Imagine, if you will, rising earlier than the sun, eating a mere “snack”- lacking essentially all nutritional value - and trekking miles to toil in the unforgiving climate of the southern states, and laboring until the sun once again slipped under the horizon. Clad only in the rags your master provided (perhaps years ago), you begin walking in the dark the miles to your “home.” As described by the writers Jacob Stroyer and Josiah Henson, this “home” was actually a mere thatched roof, that you built with your own hands, held up by pathetic walls, over a dirt floor and you shared this tiny space with another family. Upon return to “home,” once again you eat the meager rations you were provided, and fall into bed

Colonial Americans faced many hardships as they came to the new land and established the new country. These hardships were explained and told in the writings of John smith, Phillis Wheatley, and Anne Bradstreet. As these writers were primary sources, meaning they experienced the suffering and privation first hand, you can have a better understanding of what it was like for them, or the people during that era. These colonists had suffered a great amount. Either these colonists did not know how to hunt for game, they did not know how to farm correctly, they were slaves, or had troubles with many other things. Which had led to many of these colonists’ having to suffer in many different ways, such as from the lack of proper nutrition, being diseased, or from the vicious beatings of their owners. Many colonist’s lost their lives, starved, and did not know how to live when they found or were coming to the new land. There were many different types of hardships that the people of that era endured. Each writer had their own rough experience they spoke about in their writings.

She experiences a few turbulent weeks -- which will be used in order to verify her traditional views toward food -- before she becomes accustomed to its taste. This period of time is pivotal in establishing that Rowlandson and her Puritan brethren had a highly religious connection to food, both as they prepared it and eventually as they consumed it. In "the first week of being among [the natives], [she] hardly ate anything" (Rowlandson 79). This would certainly be expected -- the trauma of being kidnapped coupled with the huge difference in the taste of foods would surely dim the intensity of her appetite. Carole M. Counihan, as she examines the relationship between women and food, identifies food refusal as "a meaningful statement in all cultures and signifies the denial of relationship" (Counihan 101). She further argues that women "are identified with food [and] a dualistic and absolutist Judeo-Christian ideology that limits female autonomy and potential" (Counihan 110). Thus, it becomes important to examine how Rowlandson's relationship with food and her religious ideology may limit her power within the confines of a traditional Puritan meal. However, as she experiences the food of her captors, her refusal of their food signifies an attempt to distance herself from the Native American culture and perhaps to distance herself from the freedom allowed her in consuming their food without the

Ellison, the author, writes; "I downed the acid drink, proud to have resisted the pork chops and grits. It was a an act of discipline" (178). It is vital to note that several of the foods mentioned-- especially grits-- have already been recognized as racially-charged. In addition to this, the fact remains that African Americans of this time were generally not of high economic standing, and thus had to prepare foods that fit their means. This idea of low-income or typically “black” food continues throughout the novel. While in a majority African American neighborhood, Harlem, the narrator observes the following scene; "...Withering fruits and vegetables. I could smell the stench of decaying cabbage. A watermelon huckster stood in the shade beside his truck, holding up a long slice of orange-meated melon, crying his wares with hoarse appeals to nostalgia, memories of childhood, green shade and summer coolness." (460). This scene that the unnamed narrator is describing to the audience fits under the description of a common concept known as a “food desert”. That is, the area is so incredibly impoverished that individuals living in the area have a very little amount of nutritional options. The people residing in Harlem are too poor to even afford fresh cabbage, much less more substantial foods, such as meat or bread. In another scene, during a riot, the foods that are stolen

This seed is one of the foundational pieces of the whole play, perhaps it’s most important. There are numerous bits to analyze in this passage, ranging from its reflection of the American Dream during the Depression to the fact that the dream is so repeated among the two men that even dull Lennie has memorized some of it. For our purposes, it’s very important that this talk of the farm is talked about wildly throughout the play – it seems like the farm is a dream to George, a hope for Lennie, and (eventually) even a plan for Candy. It’s especially interesting that sometimes it seems the farm is the dream that keeps them going, and sometimes it is just a reminder of the lack of usefulness of dreaming.

Parker also explains her purpose through the use of stylistic devices like imagery. She uses concrete images to portray the idea of poverty. She explains that “Poverty is staying up all night on cold nights to watch the fire knowing one spark on the newspapers covering the walls means your sleeping child dies in flames.” What adds to the readers idea of poverty is the horrendous image of a child burning to death, also the newspaper-covered wall of a make-shift house. There are plenty other nouns like grits with no oleo, runny noses, and diapers that paint an image of poverty in the reader ́s head. You also have the sense of ́smell ́ through this essay by phrases that describe the “sour milk”, “urine”, and “stench of rotting teeth”. You can also ́feel ́ poverty through hands that are “so cracked and red”, since the author cannot afford vaseline. The use of imagery makes the a!udience more conscious of the effects of poverty. !