Before Kamehameha was king he was a son of Keoua Kalani a chief of Kohala. After his father died Kamehameha was trained by Kekuhaupi’o and became a warrior. He learned some information of how to be a district chief. Before his uncle/father Kalani’opu’u was getting close to death he declared that Kamehameha was going to be a war god. Kamehameha made a bold move and stepped forward and presented a dead chief to the gods. Kamehameha was an effective leader because he was caring to other chiefs. Kamehameha was an effective leader because he was caring. He put the more restless chiefs near his court (23). He trusted governors of various islands. He trusted John Young with Hawaii and Ke’eaumoku with Maui (23). This was something that changed after
Kamehameha was an effective leader because he was responsible by knowing what was good for people in Hawai’i. He was responsible by making the “Splintered Paddle Law.” The “Splintered Paddle Law” was if someone attacked someone they would be put to death (12). This law was created after he attacked innocent people, but nearly died
Kamehameha was caring because he rebuilt his land, cleaned the fish ponds, making the taro patches, and also making long, irrigation ditches. This helped to keep the land clean and sustainable. Another example is, Kamehameha was caring because he put a kapu on young trees used for sandalwood. This is a clever decision because Kamehameha put a kapu so the people won’t spend so much time cutting the trees and the young trees so it will save the natural resources. Hawaii would have been much different if Kamehameha wasn’t a leader at all because the kapu and the way of land system might have changed. Also if Kamehameha wasn’t
King Kamehameha was an aware leader who paid close attention to all his islands to make sure that there was no rebellions. King Kamehameha cared about his people and his land and wanted everything to be fair for all his people. King was also aware that foreigners want to take advantage over the Hawaiian islands so he would ask John Young if he thought the trade was a bad choice or a good choice. King Kamehameha being aware helped him in the Royal Monopoly and even put him on the top of the Monopoly. King Kamehameha was an effective leader because he was smart and a strong leader.
Developing good relationships with the people was one of Kamehameha’s strengths as a leader. It is important for a leader to have good relationships with the people or the people will not follow. One example that showed how Kamehameha was an effective leader is he worked in taro fields to replace what was has damaged after a war(23). He helped the people and the islands when they needed it. This is significant because he led by example and did not have the people do it alone. Helping others stayed the same after the unification of Hawaii and this is good because Kamehameha strived for the people to help each other. Another example is he placed an ali’i on each island to rule whom he trusted very much. When battles were to take place, these leaders would demolish the enemy right away for Kamehameha (23). These governors were trusted
Kamehameha was an effective leader because he also cared about his people and the land.What Kamehameha did to help the people and the land was, he put a royal monopoly on the young Sandalwood trees. This helped to protect the sandalwood trees, so that the Sandalwood would not die out. This was a new thing that was put in place after the unification. This was a good Kapu, because it would help to keep the Sandalwood trees alive and it would also protect the Hawaiians trading supply of Sandalwood because a lot of what the Hawaiians traded to foreigners was Sandalwood. The sandalwood trade was important because they got a lot of things that they never had before, from the Sandalwood Trade.
Kamehameha was an amazing leader for many reasons for example Kamehameha was the first person to unify all hawaiian islands which led to peace on all the aforementioned hawaiian islands, he won many wars to not only take over land but also ensure the protection of his people and more. Kamehameha was so destined for greatness that before he was even born there were rumored legends of a child born from the eye of the tiger shark will cause the blood of chiefs to run throughout the streams over all land, And Kamehameha’s mother while in her pregnancy was craving tiger shark’s eye. At a young age Kamehameha became the guardian of Kukailimoku the war god. Even in the later on in his life he helped in the farms that usually only the commoners would do. Overall Kamehameha was an effective leader because he took initiative and had a growth mindset.
Leadership is very important in today’s society for a group to thrive. Without a leader, there would be no organization, resulting in a tumult. It would cause disarray and lead to the fall of civilization. In simple terms, this world can’t exist without great leaders. Such powerful leaders include people like John Wooden.
100,000 enemy soldiers died and four major battles, and his Empire only lasted 10 years after his death until it crumbled. He achieved many things in his lifetime, but those things didn't last very
Kamehameha was truly an effective leader because he had a caring heart, his responsible to his land and his village, and his trustworthy words. With his characteristics he got villagers to trust him more, he gained a new role a administrator and made new kapus, and gained other governors loyalty with gifting them land. Therefore Kamehameha was an effective leader with all these characteristics. What Kamehameha did for Hawai’i back then was to unify all the lands and today with all the islands unified there is no violence in between the eight
Throughout history, men typically dominated societies. Men have always appeared to have more respect and rights than women, depending on certain civilizations. In societies like Egypt, men were frequently pharaohs and today, are considered to be great rulers. Women were often expected to take the job of motherhood in Egyptian society. Although this was their anticipated responsibility, women, usually upper class and royal, were still permitted to get an education, to possess property, own businesses, have a job and be involved in military control. Women could also rule as pharaoh, which was an infrequent occurrence but did sometimes happen. Hatshepsut, for example, is one of the few women who became a pronounced leader in the ancient
Andrew Jackson was the 7th president of the United States of America. He was a man who was well respected by the people due to his time fought in the Revolutionary War. There are many opinions on the type of president and man he was. Historians debate if Andrew was a very successful populist who appealed to the majority of people or was he a dictator who abused his power. Many articles and documents about Andrew Jackson seemed to display characteristics of a dictator. Andrew Jackson was more of a dictator than populist because he was described as a king instead of a president by the citizens of America and he fired people he did not trust from their political positions then proceeded to put people who supported his campaign in those positions which shows an abuse of power.
the traits of a “good king”. He was a warrior with extraordinary abilities which made him seem
Strength, determination and dedication are a few examples of characteristics, which a leader should possess. Characteristics of a good leader may vary in the eye of the beholder, however, I believe that overall there are a few qualities that are critically important. Throughout a person’s life, the experiences they endure shape them and build them into an individual. Like the lugals in Mesopotamia, it is a leaders obligation to protect and serve. In the Mycenaean civilization the Wanax stood at the top of their social ladder. In the Odyssey, Odysseus would be a Wanax because he owned an independent walled kingdom or palace. Both Odysseus and Gilgamesh were looked up to as leaders. When asked if they were successful leaders, I was a bit
Many historians claim that Attila the Hun is a great leader, however there are still people who disagree, Peter Heather claims that “Attila’s decade of glory was no more than a sideshow in the drama of western Europe” . Heather continues, stating that the Huns impact on the collapse of Rome was nothing more than an accident . Furthermore Heathers continues to describe how “There was nothing to explain. The origin and seedbed of all evils: the people of the Huns who dwell beyond the Sea of Azov near the frozen ocean, and are quite abnormally savage. They were just so fierce that it was natural for them to go around hitting people” . Many of Heathers books seem to focus on the Roman perspective of the Huns, and therefore we can expect some bias from his accounts. Although Michael Lee Lanning, further states how, “Attila and
From the beginning of his life as a warrior to the end as a king, he gains and develops glory, responsibility and courage, all vital to his reign as a successful king.