Whose Fault Was The Boston Massacre

the British Parliament. There was an abundance of tension between the colonists and Great Britain after new taxes were passed and British troops arrived in Massachusetts to enforce them. After many hours of chanting and protesting a shot was fired; the atrocious event left five men dead. The question society still ponders over 200 years later is what really happened and whose fault was it? The Boston Massacre initiated because of miscommunication; it was not a massacre but a mutual riot. To begin

There are many differences and similarities between the Boston Massacre and the Kent State shooting.     One similarity between the two are that both the students and the colonist were throwing rocks and calling the the soldiers unpoliet names. Both the Ohio National Guard and the British Soldiers fired at the students and colonist. Also both the National Guard and the British soldiers carried bayonets. Both protests were strong enough that proper authorities had to come in and help maintain the

colonists gathered at the old state house and began to taunt British soldiers stationed there. One was struck by a rock being thrown by a colonist, his rifle discharging as he fell. The other soldiers began firing, and after the smoke cleared five colonists were dead. Captain Preston, who was the captain of the 29th Regiment of Foot, later gave an account on the trial that states that the massacre was a blunder on the British soldier’s part. Preston’s account states that the British were there to protect

battles and freedom fighters. From the Boston tea party to voting rights. America fought against a king who was unfair and unjust. They may have had a civil war but it was also for the idea that rights were being taken away. The country has many amazing historical characters that made it the country it is today. This paper will discuss the Boston Tea Party, George Washington’s inaugural address, his warnings upon leaving office as well as the Boston Massacre, the Battles of Lexington and Concord,

country. America was a revolution force from the day of its discovery. The American Revolution was not the same thing as the American War of Independence. The war itself lasted only eight years, but the Revolution lasted over a century and a half and begun when the first permanent English settlers set foot on the new continent. Insurrection of thought usually precedes insurrection of deed. Over the years such ferment had occurred in the thinking of

environment of New England. Another interpretation of the controversy surrounding Anne Hutchinson asserts that she was simply a loving wife and mother whose charisma and personal ideas were misconstrued to be a radical religious movement. Since this alleged religious movement was led by a woman, it was quickly dealt with by the Puritan fathers as a real threat. Whatever her motives, she was clearly a great leader in the cause of religious toleration in America and the advancement of women in society

American Colonies. A representative government was present but only white male owners were limited to participate in the voting process. Everyone that wasn’t a slave in this society had the opportunity to move up in social status. It was a patriarchal society during 18th Century that consisted of the men running the household and the family business. Whether you were in the upper class or not consisted if you had slaves working for you. Britain was controlling when it came to having a great exponential

ideology, events which turned the war and ineffective strategies. The United States was left in an unpleasant situation. The French President, Charles de Gaulle, had warned the US against its Vietnam involvement, saying the only way out would be the removal of its troops, “…you will sink step by step into a bottomless military and political quagmire…” . To give a global context to the US occupation of Vietnam: there was cut-throat tension

Washington's inauguration as president in 1789, the story has a happy ending and the curtain comes down. This time-honored script renders the road from colonies to nation clear, smooth, and straight, with familiar landmarks along the way, from Boston's Massacre and Tea

Diaspora is a loaded expression that evokes diverse challenging thoughts and images. This term may also be regarded as a synonym of dislocation, multiplicity, cultural conflicts, and marginalized subjects who reside on the periphery of two different lands. Sudesh Mishra delineates this notion as “dual territoriality” since the subject has to contend with conflicts which are produced as a result of a life between “hostland and homeland”. According to Mishra, “suspended between two such terrains (living