Why Are Federal Laws Important

In conclusion by lowering the drinking age from 21 to 18 years of age, more positive outcomes exist than negative ones. A lower drinking age will allow for those of age to have a chance to learn a better sense of responsibility, decrease alcohol related incidents and provide several health benefits. As a legal adult those between the ages of 18 and 21 deserve the right to make the decision of whether they would like to participate in the consumption of alcohol or

It’ll reduce the thrill of breaking the laws. Teens find it exciting to break the law. Once they start breaking the law, it’ll get them addicted to the thrill of breaking the law. They’re going to want to keep breaking the law just to be cool. (“Reasons”). When they break the law, they think that since other people won’t do it, that it’s going to be cool to break the law and look bad. Most parents should know that almost all kids drink. If they know that their kids drink, why not let them have legally drink at 18, with not having their kids get in jail for drinking under age. (“Age”). For example, why would you go through the trouble if your child drinks and gets caught because they’re not 21 yet, but are in college and over 18 and you have to bail them out? Therefore most college kids aren’t even 21 yet, but are still exposed to alcohol and drink.

The debate of the drinking age has been long discussed throughout America. The drinking age has been 21 for the last 22 years, and people around the country have wondered weather or not this was the right call. People say that 18 year olds may not be mature enough to drink alcohol and might not know when to stop. It isn’t that teenagers don’t know how to stop, but rather have not been properly taught when enough has been consumed or how to drink responsibly. Changing the drinking age from 21 to 18 years old will take the thrill that teens get from breaking the law while drinking, will no longer give them the idea that drinking is the final stage of adulthood and full maturity, and will no longer force teenagers to drink in unsupervised

In 1984, the United States’ federal government passed the National Minimum Drinking Age Act. Under this Act, the federal government gives highway funds to States that forbid people under the age of twenty-one years old from “purchasing or publicly possessing alcoholic beverages”(23 U.S.C. § 158). The incentive created a sense of a standardized minimum drinking age despite the fact that legally there cannot be a federal minimum drinking age. Even though this Act has been in effect for decades, there are many debates on whether or not the age should be changed. The minimum legal drinking age should stay the same because it prevents a large number of drinking and driving accidents; it reduces overall alcohol consumption; and it has very horrible health effects on youth.

As Tucker explains, the minimum legal drinking act does nothing to stop teens from drinking underage. It’s so easy these days for an underage person to get a fake ID to buy alcohol with or to ask another friend over 21 to buy them drinks. The large amount of people drinking age then causes another problem that people believe could be solved if the legal drinking age was lower, people having less respect for the law. People who drink underage know they are breaking a law, but they aren’t very worried about that, this may then lead into them breaking other laws as well as not having much respect for the law in

In 1984, the United States’ federal government passed the National Minimum Drinking Age Act. Under this act, the federal government gives highway funds to States that forbid people under the age of twenty-one years old from “purchasing or publicly possessing alcoholic beverages”(23 U.S.C. § 158). The incentive created a sense of a standardized minimum drinking age when legally there cannot be a federal minimum drinking age. Even though this Act has been in effect for decades, there are many debates on whether or not the age should be changed. The minimum legal drinking age should stay the same because it prevents a large number of drinking and driving accidents; it reduces overall alcohol consumption; and it has very horrible health effects on youth.

“Lowering Minimum Legal Drinking Age (MLDA) twentyone would be good for the economy. More people would legally be able to drink in bars, restaurants, and other licensed establishments. Revenue would increase for private business owners, and greater amounts of tax revenue would be collected by the government.” (Procon). The opportunity to serve more people alcohol within the drinking establishments would allow for more revenue in bars and also increase the tax revenue for the United States Government. Therefore then the government could lower taxes in other areas and still keep the revenue the same. In twentynine States, Minnesota being one of them, consumption is permitted only in the household of the defendant's parent or guardian with the consent of the parent or guardian. This permission is to grant parents the responsibility to teach their children what it means to drink cautiously and responsibly. “Lowering MLDA twentyone would reduce the number of underage people who are hurt from alcohol-related injuries or accidents due to fear of legal consequences if they sought medical attention.” (Procon). Without the fear of getting in legal trouble, many young people would learn how to become active, responsible and tax paying citizens. They would learn that their choices of drinking too much could result in a visit to a detox center which would continue to have consequences related to that or they would learn that drinking responsibly has a greater impact on themselves and also their community as a whole. In conclusion, lowering the drinking age to Eighteen would increase the sales at local establishments and directly benefit the

The controversy of the benefit is that during young adult years the body is still in development, therefore, if you drink at a low age you are more likely to be an alcoholic when you grow up. Drinking is a larger choice than smoking because alcohol reduces your ability to make choices rationally by intoxicating you. Being that if you get drunk you might regret a decision made under the influences of alcohol. Although this article contradicts itself, it's effective because it gives you the good and the bad side of underage drinking. It leaves you thinking whether it is right or wrong to drink under the age of 21.

At the age of 18, every individual who is a legal citizen of the United States of America has the option to vote, marry the love of their life, enter law abiding contracts with banks, watch R rated movies without the presence of an adult, serve in every branch of the military, and buy tobacco products. These remain key choices given to those entering adulthood, but one choice not given to those who are legally considered adults is drinking. 30 years ago this July, the National Drinking Age Act passed. This act required that those who live in the United States must wait till the age of 21 to consume alcohol legally. According to Camile Pagila, this is “absurd”, “unjust”, and “a violation of civil liberties.” Although those words could be used to describe forcing adults to wait till they are 21 to drink, in “Keeping Legal Drinking Age at 21 Saves 900 Lives Yearly: Study,” Bahar Gholipour shows that these laws that keep the drinking age at 21, save lives and protect young adults from the dangers that come from drinking.

At the age of 18, any individual who is a legal citizen of the United States of America has the option to vote, marry the love of their life, enter law abiding contracts with banks, see R rated movies without the presence of an adult, serve in any branch of the military, and buy tobacco products. These are important choices given to those entering adulthood, but one choice not given to those who are legally considered adults is drinking. 30 years ago this July, the National Drinking Age Act was passed. This act required that those who are in the United States must wait till the age of 21 to consume alcohol legally. According to Camile Pagila, this is “absurd”, “unjust”, and “a violation of civil liberties.” Although those words could be used to describe forcing adults to wait till they are 21 to drink, in “Keeping Legal Drinking Age at 21 Saves 900 Lives Yearly: Study,” Bahar Gholipour shows that these laws that keep the drinking age at 21, save lives and protect young adults from the dangers that come from drinking.

Anyone in-between 18-21 years of age wouldn’t be forced to get water or pop while dining out. By lowering the drinking age in public young adults would legally be consuming alcohol in these establishments. This would also assist the taxi businesses since young adults or anyone who has been drinking should not drive home afterwards. More people would be forced to rely on taxi’s to transport them home. Not only will this bring in more revenue but it will also help keep our roads safer. When 18-20 year olds binge drink now they most likely are not calling for a sober ride and are taking a risk since it is illegal to be

It’s not like 18 year olds can’t do anything. If someone is old enough to die for their country, why can’t they have a drink every once in awhile? Every eighteen year old can legally vote (mumsnet). They can also be elected as mayor, or a local councilor (mumsnet). In addition, they can serve a jury, make a will, open a bank account with a debit card, etc (mumsnet). They can get married. (mumsnet) You can also purchase cigarettes, which can be so much more of a danger to yourself than alcohol. (mumsnet) You can ride a motorcycle with a license, which is extremely risky (mumsnet). In 2013, there were twenty-six times more accidents on motorcycles rather than cars (IIHS HLDI). Yet these young adults still cannot

Isn’t it funny how people who are considered “adults” cannot even make their own decisions? The drinking age on alcohol is a controversial social and cultural issue in today’s society; all fifty states have a minimum drinking age of 21. The legal drinking age should be lowered from the age of 21 to 18 allowing young adults to be granted the right to drink in restaurants, bars, at social events, in the comfort of their own home, and so on. If anything, lowering the legal drinking age would have a positive impact on the United Sates economy, because revenue will rise for the owners of these establishments, and the tax revenue that the government collects will increase as well. During the 1850s there was a state prohibition of alcohol, and in the 1920s the government attempted to outlaw the use and distribution of alcohol for the nation as a whole. Both of these laws were repealed due to the fact that they were “unenforceable”, contributed to organized crime, and the corruption of law enforcement. When we, as a nation, restrict and prohibit the use of alcohol to people we consider adults, we are only repeating history. Prohibition did not nor will ever work; the proof of this is the increasing amount of underage drinking. The minimum legal drinking age in the United States should be lowered from 21 to 18 because as adults people should be able to make their own responsible decisions about alcohol consumption, it will not contribute more to traffic accidents, and it will

“Congratulations, at age 18, you’ve reached an important milestone. You are now an adult in the eyes of the law; you now have the right to make many important decisions about where you live, what you do and how you shape your future” (citation). I believe the drinking age in America should be 18 because when you’re 18 you’re an adult with a lot of responsibilities; you can vote, pay taxes, marry and fight in the army. This has been a worldwide debate for decades, and continues to, as we argue that it should be changed to 18. Turning 18 is a huge step in everyone’s life, just like it was when I turned 18 a few months ago. All these things I can do now, I can vote, marry, fight in the army, own a gun, I could even run for governor of the state Rhode Island if I wanted to! The question is, if I can do all of that, why can’t I drink?

Lowering the drinking age to 18 would allow more teenagers under the age of 18 to get their hands on alcohol. Survey shows that 18 to 20 year olds get access to alcohol through their 21 to 24 year old friends, so if the age is lowered to down to 18, 15 to 17 year olds would start drinking alcohol. Drinking alcohol is not something kids or teenagers should be allowed to drink just because they want to relax or have fun. Teenagers are more likely to be peer pressured into drinking alcohol because it is the “cool” thing people are doing. Drinking alcohol has serious effects on the human body and consuming too much can be dangerous to your health and life. From childhood to adulthood is when the body starts to transform and the