Why Are Search Engines Reliable

Three ways an individual can critically analyze sources to determine if they are scholarly and credible are authority, accuracy, and coverage. It is serious to tell the concepts you discover on a site to a specific writer, association, or corporate. A source of data is

The biggest forms of information given to you through using the internet would include blogs, podcasts, and videos. The sources I use to evaluate when doing research on the internet is authenticated speaker, speaker qualified, authority, other found credible sources, accuracy, last revision, and it’s current these are some factor I could think of. The topic I chose has credible sources and also reliability sources that are already evaluated and uploaded on podcast, blog, and video.

A network of 115 fact-checking organizations will provide the accuracy assessment for questionable articles. As a result, Google searches based on the same claim could return different opinions on the story's accuracy or inaccuracy from different fact-checkers. But even with differing opinions on the truth of a story, Google hopes that the range of opinions from different sources will give users an idea of the "degree of consensus" on any suspicious claims. The degree of consensus measures how many people who are knowledgeable on the subject agree on something.

While advances in technology can be beneficial, the growing need to have answers at our fingertips has contributed to issues with the credibility of websites. The internet is bursting with information that can be obtained through search engines or databases. However, problems arise when it comes to determining the accuracy behind the content obtained because some of

Around the globe, people highly rely on search engines to find any solution towards their question and you may be probably one of them. Yet, in the race to find the answer to even the simplest question, you may forget the fact that not every website has reliable data. In other words, it could be referred as “Fake News” that not only impels people to make their decision based on

In this assignment I will use Google and EBSCO to research privacy and security on the Internet. The differences in my search results will be evaluated for accuracy, authority, objectivity, and currency. Because I have never used EBSCO I can only assume this lesson is to show it is a better source for researching precise subjects. I believe on this particular topic the Google search will provide ample links to accurate, authoritative, and current sources but the objectivity may be skewed based on the sources agenda.

Sergey Brin noted, “Some say Google is God. Others say Google is Satan. But if they think Google is too powerful, remember that with search engines, unlike other companies, all it takes is a single click to go to another search engine.” Nicholas Carr’s essay challenges this assertion. Nicholas Carr believes even though there are multiple search engines, “the faster we surf across the Web-the more links we click and pages we view-the more opportunities Google and other companies gain to collect information about us and to feed us advertisements.” This topic elicits such strong responses because technology is a part of our everyday lives. Technology is only becoming more advanced and will continue to be a source of debate for all who use it.

Whenever one is looking at a source of information, they should observe various things to ascertain that the information is credible. These things are the source's authority, currency, accuracy, and coverage objectivity.

Individuals such as university or high school students are, at one point or another in their studies, faced with the task of having to write a technical report that involves a research (specifically focused on existing material). There is an abundance of information available in the world today, which covers a vast amount of fields and all this information is readily available to the public but it is often unclear to these students that all the information available may not always be credible and actually reliable or even true. The negligence of these students often results in non-factual research papers that are poorly written up. The failure to check for reliable sources may lead to inadvertent plagiarism too. This report focuses on what makes sources of information more reliable and credible than others, with a specific focus on research reports.

I would evaluate the credibility by searching domains with the endings like .edu, .gov, .org, and .com. These domains tend to deliver a little more substance and credibility. These sources are highly trusted with helpful information. To further your search and narrow it down, you can use “Boolean”

Google is a company that was conceptualized in a dorm room by two Stanford University college students in 1996 (Arnold, 2005, p. 1) and has morphed into one of the greatest technological powerhouses in operation today. What began as merely a means to analyze and categorize Web sites according to their relevance has developed into a vast library of widely utilized resources, including email servicing, calendaring, instant messaging and photo editing, just to reference a few. Recent statistics collected by SearchEngineWatch.com reflects that of the 10 billion searches performed within the United States during the month of February, 2008, an impressive 5.9 billion of them were executed by Google (Burns, 2008). Rated as Fortune Magazine’s

When researchers begin looking online for sources it can become tiresome looking through countless web pages to find a credible source. On Global Post.com an article, “Why is Credibility of Online Sources Important in Education?” written by Kori Morgan said, “One problem of authorship on the Internet is that anyone with the skills and equipment can publish a website. Although a resource may have good information, it may be published by someone without qualifications, experience and education.” This quote by Morgan is a great explanation of why online sources can become trouble for people’s research. Without knowing the proper techniques for reviewing websites this can be fatal for the author’s paper. Starting with the least credible website,

By using the Boolean operations we can specify our search results on a search engine. In activity 1.1, we were used this operations to minimize our results. When I searched “The dietary habits of sea otters” without the operations I got 81,900 different websites but when I use the operations to empathize “dietary habits” my results were 5,750, websites, much less and more reliable as the quality of the sources also changed. When I searched the topic without the operations I got Wikipedia as my first source, which is not completely reliable, and other websites discussing the history of otters and where they live. This results were not related to my topic so I used quotations marks to specify that I only wanted results that had “dietary habits” consequently my first sources were scientifically written articles and even videos from professionals. The only thing in common between the two searches were that they both contained Wikipedia as a source. When I searched another topic, “Cyber warfare and the Stuxnet virus” something similar happened. When I looked it up without the operations I got 59,500 results and they were separating my searches like they were unrelated to one another. For this reason used quotations and site:.edu to look for academic resource that would link the two. My results were 317 websites, all of them from accredited Universities around the world discussing the Stuxnet virus and how it has changed Cyber warfare. I did not notice any similarities between the two but another important difference is that when I used operations I got PDF’s documents. As I stated, this operations can minimize greatly my results and increase the credibility of my sources.

Recent changes in the media landscape such as the explosion of online information sources have brought changes in credibility judgment online. One of the most notable changes is the shift of responsibility for credibility evaluation to information seekers (Cosenza, Solomon, & Kwon, 2014). When a limited number of authorized institutions such as the news media could do public dissemination of information, information was selected to publish via professional gatekeeping process (Metzger & Flanagin, 2013). Individuals granted trust to the process and believed such institutions to be able to provide reliable information. In recent, however, the Internet has created information-abundant environments in which the gatekeeping process cannot properly

Research in the library labs were very helpful and informative in spotting web sites that were biased and did not have creditable information. Many people make web sites that are not credible and it is always good to select scholarly sources when writing research papers for school. When one researches a subject, you should always keep good records. I am a disorganized person, and lose