Why Be Moral ?

The issue of morality is a touchy one. Morality is defined as the values of a person or society of what is right and what is wrong. Each person’s sense of morality guides them in their actions and making decisions. Morals are very important because the actions of each individual can lead to consequences that can affect other people. Only by living by our morals can we maintain our sense of humanity and compassion for others, and be happy in ourselves.

An act is only morally right if it does more to improve the overall well being than any other action a person could have done in a circumstance. Which leads to the idea that morality is based on moral calculations.

I can agree with the idea that basing actions on morals can help to ensure that people are not being irrational in their thought processes and that people’s needs are more likely put ahead of individual wants. If morals were not involved, then decisions would most likely be made depending on what would advance the position of that person the most or on other selfish wants. At the same time, without morals being looked at, many lives could be lost because there is no clear way to judge things and come up with an agreement. Without morals, it can be extremely tough to figure out right from wrong and how a group or individual should act.

Morals can be defined as concerning or relating to what is right and wrong in human behavior; agreeing with a standard of right behavior. If the country progresses in moral excellence, it will allow us to be stronger and if we can become a united nation we can work towards achieving material excellence. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr was a civil rights activist who fought for the rights of minorities as well as the end of discrimination. Niccolo Machiavelli was a writer who took a different approach with his beliefs. Instead of him writing about morals he chose to educate rulers on how to be effective- how to maintain successfully maintain their power. While many in our society value economic progress more than ethical concerns, we should focus

In our daily life we hope that there is an innermost balance of morality, evidently determining how we act and react to various situations. However, it is not always clear what that reasoning is, if the sense of morality in each of us is actually a social inventive to do the right

Today the moral seems to be ostracized because we live in freedom, what means for us that we can do whatever we like and whenever we prefer without consequences. Similar, our society is based on a digital era. Everybody

An act is only morally right if it does more to improve the overall well being than any other action a person could have done in a circumstance. Which leads to the idea that morality is based on moral calculations.

morality permits each of us a sphere in which to pursue our own plans and goals.

According to Danielle Paquette, author of “The Magic Word This Researcher Says Can Get People to Agree with You”, the word “moral” has more power than tradition or practicality. Paquette writes, “According to new research, a perception of morality strengthens an argument, giving it more sway than opinions based on tradition or practicality.” (Paquette 1-2). The study Paquette is referring to is from the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. Andrew Luttrell, a doctoral student from Ohio State, believes “people or causes we most admire share a common trait: They’re connected to our sense of morality,” (Paquette 2). In order to see if a person’s viewpoint gets stronger or is immune to opposing ideas when one states it is moral, Luttrell and other researchers set out to conduct several experiments. In the first experiment, the researchers presented to the students, information about a fake new senior exam policy. After that, the participants were told to write down their thoughts about the new policy and were then given feedback on whether they were more moral or traditional. Those who were told that their thoughts reflected morality were more likely to support the new policy. Furthermore, in experiment two, the researchers then told different

Humanity is taught to be moral, to do good and avoid evil. However those lessons become foolish when we ask what is morality, the thing that we are told to achieve. For many morality is doing what is good and doing good is moral. This roundabout answer may be satisfactory to some that only look at the surface of the issue, however once the digging begins the grad question of morality comes into question. While this question has been looked an infinite number of times without being universally solved certain patterns have been made in the conclusions great thinkers and scholars come to regarding morality. One of these particular ideas involves a rationalist perspective that rationality defines morality or that moral failings imply rational

Referring to morality from an individual point of view, each person has strong beliefs about what is wrong and what is right. Moreover, morals differ from person to person and may be due to difference in culture. Morality also results from basic human emotions i.e. love, hate, honesty, greed, sins etc (Psychology Today).

The morals of one is directly connected to his/her group. The person is seeking approval of the group and does specific things that are approved of the group. What is right is what the group or social community says is right.

In conclusion, to life a life of morality we must live by the virtues, respond to God's call in our lives, and develop character that resembles a life of virtue. By living out the virtues we become closer disciples of

The definition of morality or what constitutes proper morals is a difficult task and may be explained differently 100 times if one were to ask 100 people. Generally speaking, being moral is conforming to the standards of good or right. This vague definition is open for many interpretations. As mentioned, morality is not recognized internationally or is scrutinized as a weakness by the realist community, at least not openly so. Morality has played a role in international affairs and war for centuries.

Now that both sides have been established, those stakeholders who favor and those who oppose the policy in question, each of their argument 's evidence and reasoning will be analyzed. The corresponding pages which follow will provide an understanding of each side through three developed sections: a critical analysis, moral reasoning, and a tentative solution. The critical analysis will thoroughly measure to what level an argument 's authoritative, accuracy, reliability, precision, applicability, and etc. is able to represent their claims. At the same time the critical analysis includes a judgement call on whether or not a side 'wins ' or 'loses ' each of their arguments based upon the strength and weakness of the argument 's claims and evidence. The moral reasoning section will then secondary the value of each side 's evidence, and focus on analyzing each side 's moral reasoning, or rather, evaluating what "values, obligations, consequences, and normative principles" present reasonableness to their position on morality. Following these two sections of analysis, a conclusion will be made on which of the two sides makes an overall stronger, more conclusive and moral argued solution to the normative question.