Why Did Parliament Want Change Essay

"Changing attitudes in Britain Society towards women was the major reason why some women received the vote in 1918". How accurate is this view?

Firstly the House of Lords reform where the voting rights of most hereditary peers was abolished. This makes the UK less undemocratic rather then more democratic. This is due to the fact that the House of Lords as a whole is an unelected chamber and therefore undemocratic, however by removing the voting rights of some

MP’s were unpaid for most of the nineteenth century and had to own land, although the property qualification ended in the 1850’s but only wealthy upper class men could be MP’s. The working class could not afford to give up their job to be a politician and that meant that their views and needs were poorly represented compared to the ones of the wealthy. This is clearly not democratic and wasn’t changed until 1911 when MP’s began to be paid allowing the right to become and MP to everyone

While the United Kingdom is considered a representative democracy it is arguable to how representative it is of everyone. It is highly unlikely that you would ever find an MP is Parliament who is from a lower class background with the majority of MPs coming from the middle and upper classes. This shows a problem with the UK’s system as not everyone is getting their voices heard in this regard. While it is possible for pressure groups to get their views heard by governments, they will ensure that pressure groups do not become so powerful they steal the government's legitimacy.

When looking up the definition of a government it says, “the governing body of a nation, state, or community”(dictionary.com). This helps to understand it a bit more, but what is the purpose of a government. Government has many purposes that keep its people safe and protected, this includes to establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity. There are so many ways that the government is use and there are so many sub categories and even those have categories. So when one is faced with a question like this there any number of responses, and but the main purpose of a

Moving along, the Parliament automatically felt more dissatisfied with their relationship. The parliament detested Charles I because he believed the parliament was a “waste of space”. Importantly, he would refuse to converse with parliament for any government issues but use them if money was desired. These disagreements lead to the civil war. According to our class lecture, “The king must go to parliament to get money to start an army and gets rejected so he closes the parliament and declares himself the single ruler of parliament and this tactic fails because community respects the rules of the parliament. Charles is forced to flea and forced to have an army. Charles has a large army and the dismissed parliament must also raise an army. As a consequence of farmers and artisan of that English class is radicalized” Charles ruled the Parliament government by putting taxes on ships and other products to use for army purposes. When Parliament was not on board with the new taxation, while the king starting arresting members of the parliament madness broke through and civil war took place. Parliament decided to create an army on their own to defeat the king, which they were successful. They put the king

Another problem with the voting system was the lack of a private vote. Employers could influence the way their employees voted by threatening to punish them if they failed to vote for their preffered candidate. This problem was fixed in 1872, when William Gladstone's government passed the Ballot Act which guaranteed a secret system of voting. Although the immediate results of the reform act were not earth shattering, the country had taken, as Lord Derby said, "a leap in the dark." Strikes, union advances, and labor organization were powerful forces for change in the final years of the century. William Gladstone was elected as Prime Minister of England for the second time in 1880 and the most important legislative action that took place during his second ministry was the Reform Act of 1884. The reform act was rejected the first time it was presented to the House of Lords, but accepted the second time because it was accompanied by a redistribution act, which had the following implications. "(i) seventy-nine towns with populations smaller than 15,000 lost their right to elect an MP; (ii) thirty-six with populations between 15,000 and 50,000 lost one of their MPs and became single member constituencies; (iii) towns with populations between 50,000 and 165,000 were given two seats; (iv) larger towns and the country constituencies were divided into single member constituencies" (http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/PR1885.htm). The actual Reform Act of 1884

Britain’s government, recognizing that industrialization was transforming Britain away from its aristocratic and agrarian traditions and fearful of the consequences, responded initially by trying to repress the movement for reform.

To further prove this point is Document 4, an illustration of the Boston Massacre made by Paul Revere, a member from the Sons of Liberty. The painting shows several British soldiers firing their muskets to unarmed colonists. Colonists who disliked the British thought the depiction of the massacre was what truly happened, though it can been seen as propaganda as Paul Revere has a bias towards Americans rather than the British. Nevertheless, this pictured resulted an increase in colonists pride and even more hatred to Parliament and King George himself. Another method King George abused his power was the Declaratory Act. After the repeal of the Stamp Act, the Parliament passed the Declaratory act, a law that basically told the colonists that the Parliament would always, “bind us in all cases whatsoever” (Document 6). This document caused the creation of the Second Continental Congress, as colonists were tired of the lack of freedom and rights the British were providing them, and wanted to depart from their ruling as soon as possible. Moreover, the colonists wanted to separate from the British because of their hatred to the king, and believed his ruling methods were completely one-sided. To colonists, they concluded that, “kings are servants, not proprietors of the people” (Document 7). This meant that kings should be more liberal by considering what the people think rather than have laws that only benefit themselves. In general, propaganda and many of the patriots’ speeches made colonists think of the Parliament was an enemy to the

1. Briefly explain each event and why you think they put the British Colonies on the Road to Revolution. Proclamation of 1763 - • The Proclamation of 1763 barred further settlement on lands west of the Appalachian Mountains. • This put the British Colonies on the road to revolution because it ruined their right to be able to settle where they wanted.

One of the prominent figures was Robert Aske, who petitioned to the King’s Council in hope of reversing the king’s actions (Doc 2). In his petition, he requested that the king condemn the work of protestants, recognize the pope, restore the monasteries, fight heresy, remove Cromwell, and generally reverse actions he has made (Doc 2). One request that stood out the most was the request to end executions for speech alone. However, not all Aske says in complete fact, Since he was strongly Catholic, he was quick to denounce the king for straying away from the pope, regardless of the implications. Furthermore, it is possible that Aske exaggerated his claims out of religious zeal. Aske, although biased in his denomination of Christianity, raises several key points that repeat themselves of the course of history, which overcomes his bias and reigns true. These points are that the government oppresses its people and takes as much power and money from them as possible. England itself would repeat this leading up to World War II, where the government took on a controlling role in education to secure more power for the state via influencing the upcoming generations of men. Perhaps what definitively proved the truth of Robert Aske was his testimony before execution (Doc 6). Since Aske was aware he was going to be executed, he wouldn’t have said anything he didn’t hold true, meaning that this document only contains inherent biases. He spoke these words a few months after his original petition. Aske complains that without the monasteries infrastructure is falling apart and travelers no longer have safety (Doc 6). These claims are congruent with his earlier struggles against King Henry VIII. The issues he warned of seem to have come true, and most telling is the fact that is being executed for his words alone. Actions speak louder than words, and when a government

The period of 1830-1931 saw gradual yet largely significant governmental reforms which led to an extension of the franchise from 500,000 to around 21 million. Prior to 1832, Britain’s franchise composed of a selective elite of the landowning class, however the 1832 reform act, although a disappointment in the extent of what it achieved, paved the way for further reform as it brought people together in rebellion (the Bristol Riots). This proved that popular pressure had the potential to be very successful in orchestrating parliamentary reform. The influence of pressure from outside parliament was

There are several important functions that Parliament must perform. The word Parliament derived from the Latin ‘parliamentum’ and the French word ‘parler’ which originally meant a talk- which is what Parliament does most of the time. Parliament consists of the House of Commons, the House of Lords and the Monarchy. Parliament is the highest judicial, legislative and executive body in Britain. A parliamentary form of government acknowledges that it derives its power directly from the consent of the people. This sort of system ensures democracy and an active interaction between the people and their representatives. The three functions that I am going to focus on are Scrutiny,

The Acts impact on political power in Aristocracy was that it increased the prestige and power of the House of Commons relative to the House of Lords, especially as it was more representative to the people. However aristocracy still retained its overall domination of politics even if its extent had been decreased somewhat. Also with removing many hard-to-control urban areas from county constituencies the domination of aristocracy was further cemented resulting in the system being very undemocratic. For the middle class as a result of the Act, more men became MP’s for new urban and industrial constituencies and it made the urban middle classes more politically powerful and influential than ever before.

Change in a business is inevitable and typically only the strongest thrive. With a fluctuating economy and constant technological advancements, organizations are expected to adapt in order to survive. When a business is posed with an issue or change, it must develop new business and strategy structures and implements those developments throughout the entire company. Communication, education and participation are all required for a change model to be successful. Though change and adaptation may be needed to better the company, with implementation of change comes resistance. Most companies face resistance on an organizational and individual level during a transition. However, it is how the company is able to overcome