Why Did Rome Fall Dbq Analysis

Fall of Rome DBQ Essay Nathan Castillo Period.5 1. In the year 476 .B.C, Rome took a fall also because before 400 c.e, soldiers wore breastplates, armor, and helmets and everything they needed to do as a soldier. But because of negligence and laziness parade ground drills were abandoned, the customary armor began to to seem heavy since the soldiers rarely wore it also, Roman soldiers didn't feel protected because they didn't have any armor so they would run away from battle so the Roman Empire wouldn't be protected so Rome has a chance of being conquered. Many disasters happened and so many cities were ruined.

The seemingly unstoppable Roman empire was certain to fall in a matter of time. Even though Rome was majorly affected by external attacks, I feel like the fall was because of the internal decline. The economy and social issues were the key factors that led to the descent of the large empire. A vast amount of their problems came from within the city. Every decision that Rome made had an extensive effect on the city itself and the rest of the world. Many foolish decisions made by terrible emperors weakened the city and eventually cause the many aspects of Roman life to crumble.

Some external factors that lead to the fall of Rome are plagues and decline in trade. Evidence of these two factors can be found in document 1. Evidence in document 1 can be found when it says, “There was a noticeable decline in trade and small industry and the labor shortage caused by the plague affected both the military recruiting and the economy. Armies were needed more than ever but financial struggles made it difficult to pay and enlist more soldiers.”.And this evidence shows that the plague and lack of trade, gave less money to Rome, which made them pay their soldier less, and gave less of a reason to join the military. Which then gave their armies less power, and made it easier to let attackers take land, kill Roman armies, and make Rome have less power, leading to the fall of Rome. Although the other external factor that lead to the fall of Rome was attackers, (raiders, Huns, etc). Evidence of this is in document 5. In document 5 it shows that “The visigoths raided Greece, killed Emperor Valens and took over south of Danube.” Also there were vandals who invaded Italy, conquered North Africa, and destroyed other parts of Rome. Which lead to the fall of Rome because there was chaos that allowed leaders to make bad decisions (such as exempting upper class from laws and diverting the army to churches). And allowed the leaders to be assassinated in midst of the chaos. And that made Rome’s land shrink and lose power without ; Emperor Valens and other Emperors being assassinated, raids in Balkan and Greece, the Visigoths taking and invading Italy, and raiding/ransacking Rome. And they [Visigoths] were able to take over and conquered North Africa and Carthage. And without those pieces of land and having to battle with the attackers attackers Rome lost power and

Another reason Rome fell is because of the destructive and violent disasters that happened. In (Doc F), in the year 366 AE there was a violent earthquake that left the shores of the Mediterranean Sea dry. This showed that the lack of water could mean less fishing and the lack of water could have created problems for people. Then there was a flood that wiped fifty thousand people away in the city of Alexandria alone. Next there was a plague that swept through Rome and sent their population from 1 million to 250,000 thousand people. (Doc F). This

One internal factor that contributed to the fall of Rome is the their once legendary army started to become lazy. Romans no longer practiced the same methods the ones before them did. They wanted to wear less armor. According to document 6,Vegetius states’’But negligence and sloth having by degrees introduced a total relaxation of discipline,the soldiers began to think their army too heavy, as they seldom put on it.’’ This quote proves that the Roman soldiers became sluggish. They stopped wearing their proper armor, which resulted in their defeat in battles. They were unprotected against arrows and attack. in addition, another internal problem Rome faced was that

Military weakness might have been a reason because when the soldiers fought they wore breastplates and helmets to protect them as much as possible.  They also did drills to keep them in fit and in check.  However when the soldiers stopped doing drills, because of laziness, the soldiers complained stating that the armor was too heavy(Doc B,Vegetius) and so they asked the emperor to set the amor aside therefore they went into battles without any protection(doc B,historian vegetius).  There was also Military weakness around the borders.  As stated above, invaders were able to sneak in when the soldiers left their positions to go fight each other instead of guarding their places and not allowing the invaders to enter through the gaps left.  Another military weakness could have been that when the soldiers left for battle archers could have easily taken them down and while the rest of the roman empire fled instead of fighting(Doc B, Michael Grant). Also since the military became weak it made it easier for the emperor to be assassinated and therefore it would become a battle for the

The first reason for the fall of Rome was Natural disasters. “The Roman world was shaken by earthquakes”, states Document F. Also, Document F states that, “The shores of the Mediterranean were left dry by the sudden retreat of the sea.” Lastly Document F states that “The tide soon returned to the weight of immense floods.” Earthquakes, drought,

Rome's army became lazy and didn't want to train right and do other things like they abandoned their armor since they were too lazy to wear it. This was said by a roman historian Vegetius in document B. Also said by Vegetius the roman army abandoned their ground drills which made them an easy target. This problem was created because of the army's laziness and the army didn't care about training. Rome also had to draft soldiers but their was a major fluad in the system and certain groups can avoid or escaped being drafted like cooks, bakers, and slaves. This was written by Michael Grant a reappraisal and since different groups of people can escape the draft the military didn't get as many soldiers. If you want a huge empire you need good leadership but that what rome lacked the

They were tired of wearing armor, so they were afraid to fight and got killed easily due to lack of protection. According to Document B, and excerpt from an ancient book Concerning Military Matters by Vegitius, a Roman historian, “But when because of negligence and laziness, parade ground drills were abandoned, the customary armor began to seem heavy since the soldiers rarely ever wore it.” This evidence supports my claim because since the army did not wear army and got hurt easily, they did not do what was best for them just because of laziness. Since the military was lazy and did not practice, foreign invaders saw an opportunity to take over Rome. Rome was disorganized and was not able to defeat invaders.

The reason Rome fell was because of its weak leaders. These leaders (emperors) made many bad decisions in their time in power (Document B). One of these decisions was made in between 400- 450 CE. The army at that time had requested

The Fall of Rome: Will America Fall to the Same Fate? Currently in the United States, there are 45 million immigrants. Over the past 200 years, the immigration rate has increased dramatically, going from about two million to forty five million (doc. 7). One of the leading causes to the fall of the Roman Empire was the increasing amount of immigrants.

Also the army was defenseless without being able to train for battle. Another piece from Document B, “Although there were many disasters, which led to the loss of great cities, no one tried to restore breastplates and helmets to the infantry. Thus it happens that troops in battle, exposed to wounds because they have no armor, think about running and not about fighting.” The Romans were unprotected. They were not focused on fighting, but instead, they were focused on running away.

One reason Rome fell was the economic problems and corruption. First of all, since the military was so weak, the leaders kept dying. Mostly of assassination. For example, in the chart in document A, 13 emperors were assassinated. Also a lot of the time the leaders would have bribed the military to stay loyal. The leaders, the people chose, had enemies. The enemies would assassinate them, and take their place. The leaders also made horrible decisions. The empire got weaker and weaker every leader. Everything kept changing. Since most of the leaders didn’t agree with what the other leader previously made legal. The laws were all over the place.

The romans had became very lazy because of their success in military conquests. Since the romans became lazy there were more outbreaks and crimes happening. This lead to many problems in the money system. Rome became weaker economically because of this. Rome was also weakened by military issues.

To begin with, one reason why the Roman Empire fell was due to their military weakness. They got weak by when they abandoned parade ground drills. They also got weak and lazy when they thought that their armor started getting heavy, therefore they did not want to wear it. According to Vegetius, the roman historian, they did not wear their armor so they were exposed to wounds, in which they wanted to run and not fight/battle, for the roman empire. Once the military