Why Do Animals Have Suffering?

A subject of life can be explained as a being with rudimentary awareness of what’s good and bad for it. A being in this sense can feel pain and discomfort. The fact that we as humans exclude animals from this category of beings is fundamentally incorrect according to Regan. He believes that pain is pain and we cannot ignore the moral significance of pain animals feel. Traditionally we place animals in a contract because we believe that they cannot feel anything, therefore human pain trumps as what is ethically important.

Following this point he points out that perhaps lobsters understand pain but they “don’t dislike it” and how “pain is not distressing them” (Wallace 63). He reinstates the fact that there is a clear difference in “pain as a purely neurological event” from pain as “actual suffering”, the latter requiring “an emotional component” (Wallace 36). Later on he states that this means that although lobster’s experience pain it is not a struggle based on discomfort but more of a preference. More akin to you preferring to sit in a certain spot around the table. These are used to inform the reader of the physical aspects of the lobster that affect the overall moral ambiguity of the subject.

We as a human population tend to forget that no matter how much we domesticate animals they will always have some primal traits that they will never loose. Even though they never loose these traits doesn’t mean that we need to assume they do not have feels of survival and pain. We also know that the nervous systems of other animals were not artificially constructed--as a robot might be artificially constructed--to mimic the pain behavior of humans. The nervous systems of animals evolved as our own did, and in fact the evolutionary history of human beings and other animals, especially mammals, did not diverge until the central features of our nervous systems were already in existence. A capacity to feel pain obviously enhances a species ' prospects for survival, since it causes members of the species to avoid sources of injury. It is surely unreasonable to suppose that nervous systems that are virtually identical physiologically, have a common origin and a common evolutionary function, and result

Lobsters and crabs are both crustaceans with relatively related genetic and anatomical makeup. While there is no in-depth trial or experiment on lobsters assessing a type of pain stimuli, there is a study performed on crabs, which could be useful in attempting to understand lobsters as well. Robert Elwood, an animal behavior researcher, focused on avoidance learning to get a better sense of whether or not crustaceans could perceive pain. He set up some crabs with two habitats to choose from: one which gave a shock when entered, and the other which did not. After he ran the trial through multiple times, the crabs were more likely to select the non-shocking environment to go after (Elwood). In nature, animals adapt in order to try and minimize damage to their body. Pain is a sudden and efficient method to recognize that a certain condition is causing harm to the body. It can be inferred that the crabs felt pain because they changed their long-term memory of which shelter to choose in order to avoid being shocked. This proves that the crabs have the understanding to identify between a pleasant and unpleasant stimulus. If crabs have the capability of doing so,

“The No Kill Advocacy Center defines ‘irremediable physical suffering’ as an animals who has ‘a poor or grave prognosis for being able to live without severe, unremitting pain even with comprehensive, prompt, and necessary veterinary care,’ such as animals in fulminant organ system. But some shelters and their allies have suggested that the definition is too narrow as it does not allow for mental suffering” (Bekoff, Marc). In this quote, it shows how they are doubtful, but in this article, we are trying to prove why they are wrong. Also, we are going to prove how and why that animals can feel emotional trauma and how they are wrong and inconsiderate of non-human emotions. In this article, he asks if animals feel emotional trauma that causes them to want to die. His response was, “of course they can. Without getting into a long discussion of whether animals have a concept of death that incorporates their knowing that if they die the pain will end, there can be no doubt that animals who are suffering profound emotional trauma want it to stop right now, just as we would” (Bekoff, Marc). It clearly states that he believes that animals do feel emotions just as we do. Animals feel same as

In the article, “All Animals are Equal”, by Peter Singer, there are three argument that he uses. The first one is the equality argument. The second argument is the physical suffering argument. The last one is the mental suffering argument.

many of our fellow creatures are more like us than we have ever imagined. They feel pain, suffer and experience stress, affection, excitement and even love…” (1). This statement can also be proven through science. Just like humans, animals also have “the same types of nociceptors… A-delta and C fibers...” (Victoria Braithwaite 1). These nociceptors are used to detect pain. If animals display many of the same qualities as humans and feel pain, they should be treated more humanely.

The last point I would like to make is that the animals are subjected to a long and painful death or inhuman suffering. Some would argue that it is just an animal and they don't feel pain the way humans do. Even if animals can't tell us that they are in pain, we can tell that they are by observing their behavior. The suffering may not only effect the animal being killed, they may also have babies who are now trying to survive without a mother or father.

For me the answer is no. It is not a smart move to argue that X feels more pain then Y game. This exact train of though Is what has lead us believe that it is acceptable to use apes in the first place. With out stepping foot in an apes shoe you cannot reasonably argue who experiences more or less pain, and psychological suffering. As said in the article though once cannot ignore the real world in hopes of making progress on this so to demand the basic rights they must limit the range of species for which they are demanding so much from.

Re ¨ A Change of Heart about Animals¨, ¨Hooked on Myth¨, and ¨Of Primates and Personhood: Will According Rights and ‘Dignity’ to Nonhuman Organisms Halt Research?¨ In these three articles the authors argue that animals are able to feel not only pain but also emotions similar to humans.” What these researchers are finding is that many of our fellow creatures are more like us… They feel pain, suffer and experience stress, affection..”( Rifkin par. 2). Although unaware to their feelings for example, “ Fish don't cry out or look sad or respond in a particularly recognizable way.”(Braithwaite par. 1) They do feel pain as they have nociceptors, which detect damage. “All creatures that can feel pain should have basic moral rights.”(Yong

In fact, whether an animal can suffer or not has been a repetitious question since the factory farming industry has initiated and evolved. In the book Animal Liberation, written by Peter Singer, he asks the same question to the reader: “The question is not ‘Can they reason?’ nor ‘Can they talk?’ but ‘Can they suffer?” There is no right or wrong answer to this question, but there is capacity to understand where one might agree with Singer and his thought that animals can suffer. Prejudice is morally unacceptable, whether it is based on

The overarching question which continues to spark debate and curb efforts to protect invertebrates is that of whether they feel pain or simply exhibit nociception. The controversiality of this question is rooted in the obscurity of the definition of pain and what denotes a painful experience in an invertebrate. The International Association for the Study of Pain defines pain as “an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage” (Horvath et al. 10). In contrast, nociception is merely a body system’s instinctive reflex to noxious stimuli, which does not require the emotional perception of pain (Andrews 121). For instance, when a person places their hand on a hot stove, they immediately pull their hand away to

The idea that an atom exists began when Democritus, a greek philosopher, stated that all matter is made up of tiny particles. The name he gave to them was “atomos” which is Greek for the word “invisible”. He was never able to prove that they existed, but other great scientists did prove it in later centuries. That discovery sparked the beginning of the nuclear power movement, which has caused controversy and arguments since then. There are many arguments on both the pros and the cons of building a nuclear power plant on the South Saint Paul/Inver Grove Heights border. Before the pros and cons can be discussed, let’s get a little background on nuclear power plants.

Caring for the animals, including gigantic insects such as the lobster, suffering is a sign of people’s compassion. Not inflicting pain to an animal or at least trying to minimize the pain they go through shows that a person cares about the others habitants of the planet. Wallace declares, “[A] criterion [for the animal suffering] is whether the animal demonstrates behavior associated with pain. And it takes a lot of intellectual gymnastics and behaviorist hairsplitting not to see struggling, thrashing and lid clattering as just such pain-behavior” (506). Even thud lobsters show that they feel pain by struggling to get out of the hot water people still boil them and make them suffer because for humans it is easier to just ignore the signs of

Christians have belief in a moral and caring Maker. Jehovah's process for fulfillment is an ethical and caring plan. This tenet of faith has prompted Christians to seek explanations or justifications for suffering (Patheos, 2016). There are several forms of human suffering: emotional, natural, and moral. Sadness, regret, fear, are examples of emotional distress. Cyclone, storm surge, avalanche, volcanic, mental illness and AIDS are some example of natural disasters. Moral suffering is brought on by the deliberate acts of fellow human beings to cause suffering, something Christians call a moral evil (Patheos,