Overall the popular press articles had a surprisingly accurate depiction of the research study they were reporting. All of the articles explained the method of the study and the overall result. However, they did exclude some important information from the study. The research article, “Chimpanzees Trust Their Friends” was conducted in two stages. In the first stage, the experimenters observed chimpanzees and coded their behavior to determine who they were “friends” with and who their “non-friends” were. The next stage was the experimental stage in which the chimps were tested 12 times with their friends and 12 times with their non-friends. The chimps were placed across from each other in separate rooms, but were able to see each other. The chimp being tested had two ropes that they could choose to pull, one rope would give them less desirable food (no trust rope) while the other would give them the opportunity to receive desirable food, but only if the other chimp agreed to it (trust rope). If the trust rope was pulled, the chimp not being tested would receive the desirable food and would then decide to pull their own rope or not. If they choose to pull their rope, then the chimp being tested would also receive the desirable food but if they decided not to pull the rope then the study ended. Overall, chimps trusted their friends more than non-friends. However, both friends and non-friend chimps decided to reciprocate the trust in over two-thirds of the trusting events. Instead of trust, these results could be due to increased pro sociality toward their friends. …show more content…
All of the articles explain the two stages in which the research was conducted. They also accurately describe the experimental phase and the tasks that the chimps participated in. Lastly, the articles explain the main finding, which is that the results suggest that chimps are capable of trust and that trust is not unique to
· Based on your review of the statistics in the study, do you agree with the study’s conclusions? Why or why not?
While these studies provide positive results the draw back to them are that the sample groups for each were considerably small which means that there is insufficient evidence to support
In the book, ‘Through a Window: My Thirty Years With The Chimpanzees of Gombe,’ written by Jane Goodall, explains the lives of chimpanzees. There are a lot of similarities and some differences between chimps and human lives in terms of social behavior, intellectual ability and their emotional stages as seen from different stages of their lives in the natural setting.
1. The social structure and behavior of chimps in their communities or troops suggest many questions. What research questions might Dr. Hahn and her associates ask?
Ghose, Tia. "Male Sexual Aggression: What Chimps Can Reveal About People." LiveScience.com. Purch, 1 Nov. 2014. Web. 18 Mar. 2016..
“In their natural homes in the wild, chimpanzees humans’ closest living genetic relatives”, who are more like us than they’re like gorillas are never separated from their families and troops . “Profoundly social beings, they spend every day together exploring, crafting and using tools to solve problems, foraging, playing, grooming each other, and making soft nests for sleeping each night” . They care deeply for their families and forge lifelong friendships . Chimpanzee mothers are loving and protective, nursing their infants and sharing their nests with them for four to six years . They have excellent memories and share cultural traditions with their children and peers . They empathize with one another and console their friends when they’re upset . They help others, even at a personal cost to themselves . When one of another
In “Chimpanzees’ Stress Level Lowers When a Pal is around”, Written By Los Angeles Times the central idea of this article is to grab the readers attention that having a friend makes you less stressful. In the first stanza it states “ it found that quality time with close companions significantly decreased stress hormone levels in the primates,” we have alot to learn from chimpanzee’s and how they contribute to humans today.“ Like humans, chimpanzee’s tend to have best friends, or bond partners with whom they feel close.” Having relationships with the people where closest to decreases stress.
For this paper I decided to visit Zoo Atlanta to observe lowland gorillas. I got to the zoo at around eleven in the morning and found out the feeding times for the gorillas. Once I found them, after watching them for a little while I selected the most active group to go watch during feeding. The point of this trip was to make me feel as if I was doing a field laboratory observation of primate social behavior and it definitely did. As you read my paper I will include what I saw, my feelings towards it, and also any questions or facts I received during my visit from volunteers or signs throughout the exhibit. To put this paper
Another way humans are similar to other species is that just like humans, other species recognize that citizens within their species have different thoughts, opinions, and information as well. This was proven by a study conducted on chimpanzees on two different sides of a screen, who used theory of mind. “The Golden Rule”, is no longer unique to humans. Researchers found that bats use a “tit for tat” method when deciding if they are going to cooperate within a communal feeding system among a community of mother bats feeding each other’s babies. Empathy is also no longer unique to humans. When studying chimps, de Wall discovered that a victim of bullying is comforted in the chimp community. While studying chimps, (First case) de Wall noticed that a smaller chimp that went to threaten a group of leader chimps gets beat up,
The beginnings of conspecific care are currently unknown; however, researchers do note that other primates, including chimpanzees, participate in altruistic care of conspecifics (Hublin, 2009). Hublin (2009) decided to compare the Neanderthal SH14 and Salé specimens to data collected on chimpanzee behavior. SH14 was an individual that did not make it to adulthood due to cranial malformation and would have required constant aid to stay alive for as long as it did. The Salé specimen was a young adult female that suffered from cranial distortion and muscular trauma (Hublin, 2009). Both specimens would have relied on relatives or peers to
Within this essay, we will study more in depth the behavioral as well as physical traits of two primates at a zoo from their interaction with their peers to their place in the group. This observation would enable us to further understand the possible existing correlation between humans and primates. First, I studied a female chimpanzee with her baby, and then, a dominant male gorilla, in San Francisco Zoo at about noon, on May 23, 2015, for an hour each. Even though they share some similarities such as having a large brain, living for a long time, and being bored in their enclosure, they are still different; when gorillas are the largest, chimpanzees are the smartest. In fact, chimps use tools to catch food, they would not be able to reach
The article is about two pages long. The article has more technical language, because there is an actual study involved. There are no exaggerations at all, it is purely about the study that the University of Connecticut did.
Research by Yamamoto, Humle and Tanaka in 2009 concluded that chimpanzees show altruism only when prompted or pressured rather than voluntarily [5]. This particular empirical research challenges the evidence proposed by prior researchers and tests the limits of chimpanzee’s altruistic nature. Using colour-coded tokens, one of which allowed for a partner to share the reward with the test subject and one of which gave the test subject all of the reward, several chimps were tested as to their response. Results showed a tendency for the chimpanzee to take the prosocial option in situations both with and without peer pressure. Abnormally results showed that pressure or harassment from partners reduced the chimpanzee’s inclination to take the prosocial option. Although these results challenge prior research [5] they are limited as they are not conclusive and raise questions of their own to reach a complete understanding. These research results are significant in challenging an already established understanding of chimpanzee’s altruistic traits and acts as a good contrast to other references. This resource stands out as it does not make conclusive statements out of abnormal results but rather opens up a reader’s opinion and presents issues further
Also, recent news has reported that chimpanzees (Choi, 2007) and toddlers (China Daily, 2006) have shown true altruistic behaviour.
A 1982 study by The New York Times stated, "The study was made by the