“If the farmer is poor, then so is the whole country.” This is a quote by an anonymous author, and it is very true. Farmers produce food for the world. Without farmers, there would be no food. Agricultural subsidies help keep farms running by providing them with a consistent income. Subsides also promote advances in productivity and help manage the food supply. The government provides farms with money, called subsidies. Although many people believe that subsidies are a form of unneeded government interference, these subsidies help keep many farms running, providing a consistent income. Farmers do not see money every day, they get their money in bulk. The money comes from harvests, which are few and far between, and do not always provide well.
Growing up on a small family wheat farm in southwestern Oklahoma, I have experienced the harsh conditions of farming firsthand. The job that used to employ the largest amount of people in the United States has lost the support and the respect of the American people. The Jeffersonian Ideal of a nation of farmers has been tossed aside to be replaced by a nation of white-collar workers. The family farm is under attack and it is not being protected. The family farm can help the United States economically by creating jobs in a time when many cannot afford the food in the stores. The family farm can help prevent the degradation of the environment by creating a mutually beneficial relationship between the people producing the food and nature. The family farm is the answer to many of the tough questions facing the United States today, but these small farms are going bankrupt all too often. The government’s policy on farming is the largest factor in what farms succeed, but simple economics, large corporations, and society as a whole influence the decline in family farms; small changes in these areas will help break up the huge corporate farms, keeping the small family farm afloat.
Before industrialization, we depended heavily on farmers; they would grow crops so we could survive and live peacefully, but because of industrialization we faced other problems, the Gilded Age. This age has the farmers facing many problems: tariffs, taxes, shelter, money, etc. Farmers are unable to survive in this situation. Based on the article, Overview of the Gilded Age, “Many farmers blamed railroad owners, grain elevator operators, land monopolists, commodity futures
When the mechanization of agriculture was in effect farmers began to invest in technology so that they can increase the farm worker productivity, and essentially grow more crops. Growing more crops meant that they would be selling more crops, resulting in the increase of profit, but the problem with this is that the machinery necessary to do so is expensive. Since this machinery is a necessity and is expensive that meant that not everyone could begin farming. This means that there were less farmers, but the farmers who who still farming were producing more crops. Farmers thought that the more crops they produced, the more profit they would make, but the overproduction of agriculture was a direct link to economic insecurity of
Just as in Steinbeck's book the Joad family wasn't free, because of their lack of money. The Joad family had to keep working to feed themselves. This is almost the same with modern farmers because they need to keep working just to pay
There has been a pattern of overreaching power in the legislative branch has occurred. With more farms not only would we have more food but we would have more resources. That’s why I agree with this statement. Another reason and the last reason is that the factories we use need a lot of the resources we grow in the farms.
In 1940, one farmer could feed a maximum of 19 people. Today, one farmer can feed over 155 people (Prax,2010). What changed? In the 1940’s many farmers relied on either working by hand or horses to work their land. However, horses tire out easily and working by hand takes an extensive amount of time. Because of these factors, farmers could only have small amounts of land, because that is all they, or their horses could manage. Today however, innovations such as the tractor and other motorized machines allow the farmers to work quicker and more efficiently; they are able to work more
The Agriculture sector has changed monumentally over the past century in response to vast economic change and technological advancements. Farm subsidies are various forms of payments from the federal government put in place in an effort to stabilize prices, keep farmers in business, and ensure quality of crops. The federal government currently pays $20 billion in cash each year to US farmers and spent an estimated $250 billion between 1995-2005. Presently, a new farm bill is passed every five years
The life of King Tutankhamun Was very short and underwhelming. However, King Tutankhamun set a record for Egypt's youngest pharaoh. In his power he did make a few changes that af effected egypt as of today. The life of Pharaoh Tutankhamun was one of great interest to our world from his early life, to his time in power, and his death/ burial.
The highest 10 percent earned more than $113,140. Incomes of farmers change from year to year because prices of farm sales change with weather conditions and other reasons. In addition to earning pay from their farm business, farmers can get government aid or other payments that add to their income and reduce some of the risk of farming. Most farmers work full time. Farm work can be all year around and the number of hours worked may change according to the season ("How Much Money Do Farmers Make on Average Annually?" ). Farmers on crop farms usually work from sunrise to sunset sometimes even after dark during the planting and harvesting seasons. During the rest of the year they plan the next season’s crops and repair and maintain machinery. The average farmer works more than 40 hours per
Agricultural subsidies is a very complex and controversial economic topic today. It will continue to be a hot topic as government continues it. It is largely debated in the United States as well as in other countries. The reason it is so largely debated is because it literally have an effect on the entire world market. Not to mention that the farm has been booming the last 5 to 10 years. This topic also tends to draw strong opinions in our area in particular due to the large agricultural community in our region. However, even within different states there are many supporters as well as opponents to these government subsidies.
how to present the material in a way so as to offend the least amount
I would become a farmer, the reason I would choose to become a farmer is that I don't think I would be able to the other jobs. For example, if I were to become a miner, there would be various risks I might hurt myself, to begin with, maybe I won't have the luck to find anything. There is just so many pros and cons to becoming a miner. Next would be a cowboy I wouldn't be able to do much, and I probably won't make as much money as being a farmer. Being a farmer wouldn't be comfortable either, but in my opinion, I don't think I'd be able to get the other jobs done. Also, I have been working for my benefit and earning my own money. The main reason is that of The Homestead Act; this is because this act would allow me to own my private land. The
McDonald explains how, under the neoliberal policies, farmers are expected by the government to compete with the global economy with little government intervention. (McDonald 321)
Although agricultural subsidies contribute to stabilize the prices of farm products and increase income of farmers, they also distort free trade and damage the local environment.
We all remember as kids going to the doctor’s office and dreading getting shots. I remember thinking that if I take this shot I won’t get really sick and that was that. Now in this decade parents and families are coming forward and sharing their complaints of the vaccines that are supposed to be helping their kids’ but instead are hurting them. Parents are saying that they have decided to not give their children vaccines and that is now raising the question should parents be legally obligated to have their child vaccinated? If the parents aren’t willing to get their child vaccinated, they are putting other lives in danger. Health officials and the government should get involved in this ongoing issue. A solution to this problem is to have a law stating that parents should always have their children vaccinated unless medically unable to do so.