Why Do Gun Control Laws Increase Violent Crime

If gun control is regulated, then we will have less crime. Access to firearms makes killing easy, efficient, and impersonal, which increases the lethality of crime. Josh Sugarmann, the Executive Director of the Violence Policy Center has once said, "We recoil in horror and search for explanations, but we never face up to the obvious preventive measure: a ban on the handy killing machines that make crimes so easy.”Allowing untrained people to carry guns puts others at risk and it can result in self-inflicting injuries both by suicide and unintentional incidents. Gun violence in America kills more than 30,000 and injures almost 70,000 each year. Guns can be misused and abused, which is why gun

Current Gun Control regulations do not deter violence and crime. It has been shown that places that have relaxed their gun control laws have a higher crime and death rate. Data proves that homicide rates “[...] among the metro areas whose principal city is in a state that requires some form of permit to purchase a gun, is 4.32 per 100,000 residents, compared with 5.74 among cities in no-permit states”(Bailey). This is evidence that there is a correlation between gun control and death rates. It is also proven with statistical evidence that places with the least amount of gun control have the most violence. Statistics show that “‘none of the states with the most gun violence require permits to purchase rifles, shotguns, or handguns. Gun owners are also not required to register

The majority of anti-gun advocates voice their opinion that more guns would produce more crimes unfortunately for them there is little to no truth in that claim. In reality, when gun ownership increased the amount of murders diminished as well. When states passed concealed weapons laws there was significant drops in the number of multiple victim shootings occurring, the number of deaths, and the number of injuries at these shootings. In 1997 both Wales and England banned handguns and the instantaneous effect was a 50% increase according to crime research. They never saw a day lower than after the year they decided to ban handguns. It has been proven by many surveys that the banning of guns increases crime rate which in turn proves that gun control is not the answer.

The amount of crimes happening today will only increase with stricter gun control laws because there is a higher temptation to steal guns. An American citizen claims, “Ever since I first learned how to shoot, the issue with gun violence around the nation became clear: Guns are not the problem; people are” (Sherfenski). Police need to lock up these people committing the disastrous crimes that affect so many innocent lives. These blameless people are not prepared when they are being attacked, and that is because most shootings tend to happen in areas where guns are controlled. The former United States Secretary of Education, William Bennett, explains the reason that criminals decide to go to places that have controlled gun laws is because: “These murderers, while deranged and deeply disturbed, are not dumb. They show up to schools, universities, malls and public places where their victims cannot shoot back” (Bennett). Even if guns are controlled in public places including malls and schools, where there are uncontrolled shootings, why would it make a difference if they were controlled everywhere? It would not make a difference whatsoever because these crimes are done out of pure, revolting pleasure. Committing a crime is one thing, but taking away a right that was given to Americans in the 1790s is a whole different story.

America has always prided itself on being the land of the free. Our national Constitution and Bill of Rights have ensured that the people of America maintain their basic rights. Nevertheless, many of the rights guaranteed in these historic documents are often the subject of heated debate. The right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures under the Fourth Amendment, the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee against self-incrimination, the First Amendment’s protection of speech and petitioning activity, all of these issues have been subject to contentious arguments in courts of law and the courts of public opinion. Of late, however, the most lengthy, argumentative and noisy debates have focused on gun control. Some people think that

Hi Shaun great report; ATF is an interesting agency to research because of much criticism over the constitutional right to bear arms. Strict policy regulations monitor alcohol, tobacco, and firearms to reduce their influences on minors. Past and recent school shootings at Columbine high school (1999), Virginia Tech (2007), and Sandy Hook Elementary (2012) demonstrate an increase in gun violence; and the need for gun control. I support strict gun laws in the hope of preventing children and some adults from mishandling it. Do you think that implementing stricter gun laws would effect gun violence? Similarly alcohol and tobacco use has negative consequences for minors. Both alcohol and tobacco can be highly addictive for adults, and if exposed

There are also many countries and cities that have tried to put Gun Reform Laws in place but many have failed. According to the many police reports from Chicago Illinois, a city with some of the strictest gun laws in the US, since the gun laws were put in place the crime has only gone up and it has the highest homicide rates out of all fifty states. Some people may say that Chicago has those problems because you can get guns from another state and easily bring it into Illinois, but if you look at the countries that have gun control you will see that the same thing that is happening in Chicago is happening in those countries, just on a larger scale. For example, Mexico, where most types and calibers are reserved to military and law enforcement, still has one of the highest homicide rates in the world. Even with these many places where gun control laws have not worked, many people still believe that gun laws would prevent gun deaths. It is true that gun laws could stop the occasional gun death, but it is not going to stop

Gun control was intended to help stop people from killing each other, well that’s what we are always were told. I have gathered multiple facts and data to help compare different countries on what methods they have chosen to help reduce gun violence. Comparing the laws on banning guns in other countries such as, Australia’s law on how there government thought would help to reduce gun violence and to gather a better understanding on their methods of action. In 1996 after Australia’s mass shootings, the government proposed and passed the National Firearms Agreement and Buyback Program. The new gun laws included a ban on many types of semi-automatic, self-loading rifles and shotguns. Each gun was required to have a separate permit with a 28-day waiting period, and Australia created a national firearm registration system. Guns had to be sold by a licensed firearms dealers, and limits were placed on the quantity of ammunition that could be sold. When purchasing a firearm owners had to

In this article, Robert McCartney, a newspaper reporter from the Washington Post who also has his own radio show, interviews a Washington D.C. doctor about gun violence. Dr. Janis Orlowski, former chief medical officer of a D.C. area hospital, Medstar Washington Hospital Center, is all but a stranger to the effects of gun violence. Growing up in Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin, she was one of eight siblings, and her father loved to hunt. She stated that she had been around guns all of her life, not only at home, but throughout her community. While she does believe that something needs to be done about the gun laws, and she would support them, she also believes it is not “the sole answer.” This is coming from a doctor, who sees the awful, tragic effects of gunshot wounds every single day. As the chief medical officer, she is in charge of over 6,000 staff members. During a news brief following a shooting at a Navy yard, her sincere though trajectory had inadvertently made her a local and national celebrity. She said; “Put my trauma center out of business…. I would like to not be an expert on gunshots.”

Concealed guns increase crime. Some states allow to carry guns for public safety. Concealed guns in public is a terrible idea for so many reasons. As a result, concealed guns owner increase crimes and death of innocents.

No: Armed civilians are unlikely to stop crimes and are more likely to make dangerous situations.

Do you believe that gun control reduces crime? Guns have been a problem in America for quite some time now and the role of guns in very many people's lives has become routine. The reason is self defence. Guns are a mean of protection, it could be from someone protecting themselves from a robbery or just protection their families. The United states has been fighting the gun ban law, but most americans aren't gonna give their guns up. Gun control does not reduce crime at all in the united states.

Founding Father Benjamin Franklin once said that, “Those who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” The great American republic was founded on the principle of liberty for all. The Bill of Rights, which is a pillar of US democracy, clearly stipulates that all citizens have the right to bear arms. It is senseless to sacrifice this fundamental right for a false illusion of safety. We can reference previous periods of history in which the government placed restrictions on products and examine how ineffective they were. Furthermore, we can look at the absence of a correlation between strict gun control measures and reducing violent crime rates in US states. It is time to ensure that our Constitution is upheld to protect the ideals of American democracy. The proposal of restricting US citizens from purchasing firearms is invalid because they are protected to do so under the Constitution, strict government regulations on other harmful products have not been effective in the past, and the idea that gun control laws limit violent crime is a misconception.

The government wants to take our guns from us. Obama says it’s just a conspiracy theory. Obama claimed that some opposition to gun laws comes from conspiracy theorists who believe it’s a step toward tyranny. I don’t think it’s just a conspiracy theory when it’s all over the news. It is also talked about a lot by the government.

Do you believe that giving more guns to people can lead to less crime? What I think is that by giving Americans the power and authority to have a weapon can lead to more crimes being done. By defining the issue of having more guns the environment could be in more danger, by refuting those who claim more guns can lead to less crime one will understand that they are wrong, by presenting documented research of evidence supporting