Why Do Gun Controls Cause Violent Crime

The study found that “states with the strictest gun control laws had lower rates of gun-related homicides and suicides.” Although this result cannot draw a causal relationship between gun control policies and homicides, it proves that legislative strength and firearm deaths and ownership are negatively correlated.

Even though evidence proves otherwise, many people claim the large quantity of guns in the United States are culpable for the country’s murder rates. While the United States population and number of guns have steadily gone up since 1994, the rates of all different crime types have drastically gone down (Planty). Over the last nineteen years, almost fifty million guns have been added to the US, yet firearm violence has been reduced by more than two thirds (Federal Bureau). This completely contradicts the statement that more guns equal more violence. To compare the two, solely based on these statistics, it looks as though the upsurge of guns and armed citizens has only led to less violence. Another example, that disproves this, is the Firearm Act of 1997. After a school shooting, the United Kingdom passed this act banning almost all of their guns. That year, the UK had initially recorded seven hundred and thirty-four homicides. While only steadily increasing, by the year 2002, they had a recorded one thousand and forty-one homicides (Osborne). This act did not prevent homicides at all, and as a matter of fact it only created more violence. The District of Columbia is another case in point on how the lack of guns does not mean there is any lack of violence. DC has a 3.6% gun ownership ratio of the people living there, ranking it the lowest in the Unites States. At the same time, DC has the highest gun deaths and firearm robberies in the Unites States. The District has a

With research, people can see that the states with the strictest gun laws also have the highest crime rates in the country (Harvard 5). However, most people do not bother to look into these facts and endorse with the media.

“Roughly 16,272 murders were committed in the United States during 2008. Of these, about 10,886 or 67% were committed with firearms.”( James). There is a strong correlation between guns and crime rates; often times the cities with stricter gun control laws will have lower crime rates. For instance lets take at New York City the murder rates in New York in 2009 were 471 people, in 1990 that number was 2,245. New

According to Dr. John R. Lott Jr, world recognized economist, this is not the case at all. Lott holds a Ph.D in economics from the University of California of Los Angeles has rigorgously decidated to finding the correlation between violence and guns within the United States. According to this findings “Consealed Carry Permit Holders Across the United States” several misconceptions where cleared in a scienfic manner. First, the number of consealed handgun permits are increasing each year. Just within the past 2015 year, 1.7 million additional permits were issued. This has resulted in a 15.4% increase in permits within one calendar year. Where John R. Lott Jr. makes a distinction in his research center, that although permits are increasing, this does not neccesarily mean that violence is increasing as well. To the contrary belief violence is decreasing at a significant rate. Just between the years of 2007 and 2014 murder rates have fallen to an dismounting rate of 4.2 per 100,000 people. Looking at both variables closely this has represented a 25% drop in overall murder rate while the percentage of permits have increased at a rate of 175%. This provides a basis that lets concerned families, verterans and students that the possession of Firearms is not a direct correlation to violence within

This view is true for the 26 developed nations analyzed as well as state-to-state level. Opponents of this view argue that this does not imply that someone cannot get shot in a state like Massachusetts. Despite the strict gun laws in this state, injuries and crimes related to firearms has been on the rise (Swanson 1). Opponents feel that gun control does not do much to regulate firearm related deaths and injuries. They argue that anyone can get shot anywhere; hence, this claim does not hold true. However, statistically speaking, this supporters’ trend holds true. When access to guns is controlled, the rate of homicides is likely to go down.

States with weaker firearm laws attracts larger purchases. Gun traffickers will go to states with weaker gun laws and make big purchases, then sell them in stronger firearm lawed states. Firearms sold in ¨multiple guns sales” (selling more than one pistol per week) are often used for crime. In 1999, 22 percent of all handguns recovered in crime were purchased in multiple guns sales. Therefore limiting gun ownership will limit large

Britain, Canada, and Australia have all made promises of lower crime rates due to gun control, the results? A sharp increase in crime across those

The United States has a population of roughly 319 million people yet it has an accumulative amount of 371 million firearms at its disposal. One notable example of this statistic coming into play is seen when you look at the city of Chicago. Chicago is the city with the strictest gun control laws in the country. When the Gun control legislatures were passed in Chicago, crime dropped at a rapid rate. Although after a year or two Chicago remained to be the most dangerous city in the United States due to the availability of firearms in the surrounding environment. With the wide scale implementation of gun control it is more than reasonable to expect a steady decline of gun homicides as a

The United States firearm homicide rate is twenty times higher than the combined rates of twenty two countries in which are similar in wealth and population with the United States. Also, statistics show homes containing a firearm are twenty two times more likely to be used to kill or injure in a domestic homicide, suicide, or unintentional shooting than to be used in self-defense.

In areas with a lot of gun control, violent gun crime does not lower and some cases get worse. But, in areas where more citizens legally own guns, there is the less violent gun crime. The perfect example of that evidence in Chicago. In 1982, Chicago banned all handguns in the city. From the time the ban was enacted(1982), to the time it was repelled(2010), 59% of all murders were committed using handguns(isp.state.il.us). From 1982 to 2010 the murder rate in Chicago per 100,000 people increased drastically from about 23 murders per 100,000 people to numbers up to 34 murders per 100,000 people in 1992(ucr.fbi.gov). To put those numbers into perspective there were about 9 murders per 100,000 people in the United States the same year(1992) 34 people were murdered per every 100,000 in Chicago. (ucr.fbi.gov). If a criminal wants a gun they're going to get a gun, it’s just like drugs their illegal but addicts always get them anyways. These statistics from the FBI crime reports show that taking away guns does not decrease gun

Education rates showed to be lower in states with the most gun violence as well. There are plenty of studies that have helped show how states with the highest gun violence and less gun control are states that have the most poverty as well as less educated Americans. To determine the states with the most gun violence researchers reviewed firearm related data from the CDC (Center Disease Control, Uniformed Crime Reports and the U.S Census Bureau (Kent, 2015).

Several peer reviewed studies on the subject of gun ownership and gun related homicides were identified and reviewed. During the research phase it was noted that there are opponents and proponents of gun control that present logical sounding arguments, but there have been several research studies conducted that suggest that there is a positive correlational relationship between gun ownership and gun related deaths, particularly gun related homicides. This paper will review many studies that have been conducted on the correlation between gun ownership and availability and the rate of gun related homicides. The majority of the studies focus on comparing the United States to other countries since it has been found that the United States has a disproportionate amount of gun related deaths when compared to other countries of comparable economic and political status.

Finally, The United State’s gun homicide rate is higher than other high-income countries and The Murder Rate is much lower in developed countries with gun control.

Statistics show that less guns do lead to less crime a study of Harvard shows it Harvard said “The more guns Americans have the more violence will come to America”(Harvard).