Why Do Juveniles Deserve To Be Tried As Adults

Whether juveniles should be tried as adults in the justice system or not, has been an ongoing debate for many people. There has been many cases throughout time where people under the age of 18 have been tried as adults in the justice system. Information about this debate can be found in articles, novels, and podcasts. Typically people who are under the age of 18 are identified as a juvenile delinquent and go through different procedures after committing a crime. There is many examples and evidence of why juveniles should not be tried as adults. A juvenile is typically considered a person who is under 18 years of age.

Juveniles should be tried as adults when they commit serious crimes as opposed to rehabilitation or various forms of lesser sentencing. The rate of juveniles in prison has increased over the years. Many young adults and children often seek for attention which leads them to cause trouble out in the streets. There are risk levels that officers have to make in order to help the juveniles or if committing a serious crime, they should pay the consequences. Many may oppose and think that young adults and children are not adults, but they should be punished for the crimes they have done.

There are many controversies that surround juveniles being rehabilitated rather than going through the adult justice system, but studies show that juveniles are not fully developed to be tried as an adult. One of the main questions that it always boils down to is “should juveniles be tried as adults?” in my opinion juveniles should not be tried as adults because of their age.

Other people argue that Juveniles may not have the mental capacity to know that this is wrong. This is, in fact, wrong in most cases. A child no matter what the age should know that killing or performing other atrocious acts on others is wrong.There are some exceptions such as mental illness and adverse effects from medications. According to https://flowpsychology.com/10-pros-and-cons-of-juveniles-being-tried-as-adults/, “because teenagers have full control over their thoughts and actions. If they do not have the moral compass instilled in them by that time, then they are very likely to commit more crimes.” This implies that, should teenagers not be tried as adults, they may never learn their lesson.Even if they don’t from harsher punishments; at least they will

Kenzie Houk had everything going for her. She was twenty-six, engaged to the love of her life, and was eight-and-a-half months pregnant. In the late winter of 2009, her four-year-old daughter waddled in her bedroom, hoping to surprise her mommy with a good morning smile. Instead, she found her mother with a bullet through her head. Eleven-year-old Jordan Brown, the soon-to-be stepson of Kenzie Houk, was arrested and charged with homicide, pulling the trigger before he went to school. There were two counts of homicide, one for Kenzie Houk and the other for her baby. Brown was tried in juvenile court and sentenced to a residential treatment facility until the age of twenty-one. To Kenzie Houk’s family, Brown’s sentence would never live up to that her four-year-old and seven-year old daughters would have to serve. “The day Kenzie was murdered, the whole family was served with a life sentence,” said Debbie Houk, the victim’s mother. “[Her daughters] are serving life right now. They are never going to see their mom” (Chen). Serious juvenile crimes, similar to this, cannot be properly justified in the juvenile justice system. Juveniles should be tried in the adult criminal court system for serious crimes because of the lack of severity in the juvenile court system, increased youth crime and recidivism rates, and the mental maturity of juvenile offenders.

Should a teenager that murdered his entire family go to prison? How about a kid who rapes his sister and her best friend? Criminal defendants under the age of 18 are sent to juvenile court. In this court, you will not be tried in front of a jury. Instead, the judge will look at the evidence presented and decide on whether or not you have commited the crime.

If we don’t try juveniles in adult court for serious crimes what should the alternative be? This question has been around for a long time and we still don’t have the answer for it. Juveniles commit crimes on the daily but some plan their crimes and some just do it knowing that what they’re doing is wrong. Having a young child from about five to eight commit a crime is difficult to decide if we should try the child as an adult or a juvenile. Children that are young may still have a chance that's why they get tried as juveniles. Some of the juveniles get sent to rehabilitation centers to hopefully get better.

The question to whether or not a juvenile should be tried as an adult for committing a crime is still quite complex. There are those that believe a crime is a crime and no matter who the person may be they shouldn’t be punished the same way as everyone else. Though other oppose that they shouldn’t be punished so harshly because it can severely fracture their mental health. Though there must be some other resolution to sentencing juveniles to life prison and therefore ruining their

There are many cases where juveniles have gotten their life ruined because they are convicted as being an adult. Juveniles should not be tried as adults no matter how severe the crime might appear,if and only if they did not plan the murder. There are many factors that drive a juvenile to commit a crime which they did not intend or plan. A teenager’s background is one of the major reasons why they behave erratically. The example they receive from their guardians at home has a major impactor effect as to how they think and act.

Every juvenile who commits a severe crime should be tried as an adult. Juveniles should understand the differences in between both good and bad. Most kids that are 15 and older are the ones committing the worse crimes, by that age they should understand the differences in between both good and bad. Every person in the world should be able to think before they do, being able to think before you do will help you understand what you're doing and help you understand the difference in between both the good and the bad. The parents of the juveniles should also understand that some crimes are severe and have severe punishments. Juveniles need to know that

Now at the same time there are some juveniles that deserve life sentences such as the offender in the article written by Jennifer Jenkins. This offence wasn't out of necessity nor was it an accident from what Jenkins stated. Personally that’s where the line should be drawn by the government. Youth should not be sentenced to life without parole unless they purposely kill a person without probable cause, which in most cases is in the act of self defense. Other than that teens shouldn’t be tried as adults until they are age eighteen. What do you propose regarding youth being tried as

Criminals under the age of eighteen are committing heinous crimes. Charging them as a minor because of their age does not ensure that they won’t commit the crime again. If they are tried as adults, because they should know better, the crime rates will be reduced. Juveniles should be tried as adults for serious crimes because it enforces discipline, prevents crime, and emotionally helps the victims families.

Juvenile Justice Do Juveniles deserve life in prison? Juveniles don’t deserve life in prison because their brains aren't fully developed and if they go to life in prison and they come out they will not come out the same as when they went in. I believe that juveniles should not be sent to life in prison because they couldn't handle the hard and cruel life of prison. If juveniles do something that is serious like murder then yeah they should be sent to life in prison. Some teenagers aren't mature like others they take a little longer to develop.

We can drive at 16, get a job at fourteen but as soon as we pick up a gun and kill someone were ‘emotionally immature’ and ‘too impulsive to understand’. Speaking frankly, if you are old enough to purposely kill someone, you are old enough to be held fully responsible. Speaking frankly, juveniles need to be given their full sentence.

Many views these teens as their brains are not develop well and they do not know what they are doing.  That is a whole big controversy, because teens know exactly what they are doing they might do things then regret.  In the issue Greg Ousley Is Sorry For Killing His Parents. Is That Enough? By Scott Anderson his parents weren't much of caring of their child. Greg was tired the way his parents had no remorse towards him. Instead of Greg going to ask that he isn’t living a good surrounding it’s another case that killing the what makes them uncomfortable seems to be the right pathway. The 65 years of sentence was the right way to go. Sorry doesn’t help a heinous crime in the matter of killing both his mother, and his father. Greg had planned it many times times Andersson states “ Two days later, during his third-period study hall, he opened his high school notebook and penned a message. “ This weekend,” it began, “I am going to kill my parents” (Andersson 102). Doing the time, but sorry for what he had done is extremely awful. In On Punishment and Teen Killers by Jennifer Jenkins. Jenkins states “advocating for these convicted murderers be be set free” (Jenkins 92).  No one needs to be free towards what they committed. Of advertising those who being tried as an adults of how innocent and little.  They say once they had been trial as an adult they are not seen as what they were a few days ago or years ago.  But they feel so mature going through the stage of being a teen, that once they are identified as a grown up all they say of were young as they want to be a kid to not face the consequence worse of what they were going to have to