preview

Why Do People Get Smarter?

Decent Essays

There has been a world-wide debate that has been going on for some time as to whether or not people are actually getting dumber. There are five authors, Jackson, Flynn, Gottfredson, Pinker, and Duncan, that have debated on this very topic found on nytimes.com. Each author is very credible, Flynn is an author and a professor, Jackson is a stand-up comedian, Pinker is an author and a professor, Gottfredson is a sociologist, and Duncan is a staff writer. Just as most of the nation is with this topic, the debaters didn’t all come up with the same answer and each had a different reasoning for it. While the debaters are able to agree on the fact that this is a topic that needs to be talked about, however none of the debaters are able to come to an agreement if we are becoming dumber and if …show more content…

Duncan can be seen as comparing intelligence to beauty scores versus SAT scores. While Pinker is found defining it through IQ scores and how we have improved on them over the years. Gottfredson defined it through the 1993 literacy test that was taken and how we have become more complex since then. Flynn defines it in a completely different way, saying that it is because we have been getting asked different questions throughout time and we have just changed the ways that we think about things. Jackson thinks in a different sense as well, like Flynn, she does not go the route of testing but she defines our level of intelligence through the fact that people are accepting that we are dumb just because it gives them something to talk about. Every author here takes these all in a different way to define intelligence which is part of the reason why this isn’t in stasis because everyone’s definition is different. Flynn and Jackson take approaches unrelated to testing and how we have compared to those, and go in their own direction. While Gottfredson uses the literacy test, and Pinker and Flynn talk about IQ

Get Access