Why Do Police Use Tasers?

In our research study we hope to show that the goal to Tasers it to provide law enforcement with alternatives to deadly force in order to minimize harm to both community members and police. We also want to show that no use of devices or techniques may be safe to everyone, but that we can't look just

In light of the recent spate of police-involved homicides of suspects who may or may not have put the lives of the police involved in fear for their safety and well-being, this paper seeks to examine the use of deadly force by police officers in the line of duty. The training involved in using one’s service weapon in situations that call for a determination of the use of force will be explored, as will the rules, regulations, and extenuating circumstances that lead to the firing of a service weapon in the line of duty, resulting in the death of a suspect. The Supreme Court cases that have led to and/or upheld laws allowing a broader interpretation of what is considered justifiable use of deadly force will be briefly examined. Additionally, the use of non-lethal weapons, such as Tasers, by police forces and how the availability of these weapons influences the rate of deadly force will be inspected. Finally, an elucidation of the various perceptions of the general public of the police after use of deadly force is used within their communities will be addressed.

The purpose is to explain the necessity and the alternatives to deadly force. Necessity of deadly force will include laws that have been passed by the United States Supreme Court, training methods and policies of Federal, State and Local agencies Alternatives to deadly force are less-lethal weapons that are used by law enforcement today, TASERS, pepper spray, bean bag guns and batons. Does deadly force need to be used against violent suspects?

Invented by NASA researcher, John H. Cover, in the 1960’s and 70’s, the TASER® has been widely adopted by police agencies as a non-lethal alternative to guns. While these devices have aided authorities in subduing suspects, it has also resulted in numerous unnecessary deaths. The general perception of the non-lethality of Tasers along with poor judgement on the part of law enforcement has culminated in the over use and apparent misuse of discharge against suspects when alternate options have existed. The following paper will discuss in detail the creation of Conducted Energy Weapons (CEW) and the TASER®; negative medical implications of Tasers and their current use by police enforcement groups; the laws which govern the use of

In 2009 the death of Antonio Galeano, a Queensland man with a mental health condition sparked a joint review by the Crime Misconduct Commission and the Queensland Police of Taser Policy and training. The review was concerned with many aspects of Taser use especially with the over use of Tasers by the Queensland Police against those with an underlying mental health condition and those under the influence of drug and/or alcohol. Although the report has successfully implemented 24 recommendations a further assessment was conducted by the Crime Misconduct and Commission in 2011. It released an independent review of the Queensland Police Services policies and practices, where it found that a number of key concerns remained. These key concerns were related to the over use of Tasers and especially the use of Tasers upon those who are believed to have a mental health condition and/ or are believed to under the influence of alcohol and drugs. The following will provide a discussing of the introduction and development of the Queensland Police Service Taser police, where it will reflect upon these concerns regarding these ‘at risk’ groups.

Thinking back to what happened to Amadou Diallo or even Rodney King, how easily could the situation have been handled differently if a Taser gun or pepper spray was used in both incidents? To begin with, If Rodney King was acting unruly, the police could have used the Taser gun instead of four different officers beating him with four different batons then place Rodney in handcuffs since handcuffs are good with “subduing uncooperative and dangerous criminals” (). Along with Rodney King, if Amadou was the suspect the police were looking for and the wallet that they assumed was a weapon, how could they of handled this episode differently? Of course the police could have revealed their weapon to exhibit authority, but if the verbal commands were not being followed by Amadou then action by the police could have taken place.

Over the years united states of America has witnessed a full-size boom in police brutality, it 's miles one of the most commonplace and extreme violation of the human rights and it occurs greater regularly than we care to recognize in our community. Starting from verbal to bodily abuse in which usually a harmless person outcomes injured as cops lay their known as justice upon the alleged criminals. Cops are confronted with an extensive sort of threatening conditions at the job each day, they undergo an intensive training on the academy to put together them for the protection preserving activity they have got. Using force may also moreover or won 't be a enormous catch 22 situation but it should be seemed through way of the community

It is safer for the officer to use a taser against a combative suspect rather than using hand to hand combat. Using hand to hand combat puts the officer and suspect at greater risk for potential injury. Researchers conducted an analysis of 12 of the largest agencies on the east coast. The analysis confirms that in those 12 agencies using a taser was safer than using hand to hand combat (Bulman,2010). Tasers are safe when used on a healthy person. Although they are safe to use on health person the officer has to follow the guidelines of the manufacture to ensure the safety of the people. If the person is on stimulant drug while being tased it increases their chance of injury. Those stimulant drugs include methamphetamine, crack, cocaine, ecstasy, and caffeine. Not all officers are trained to tell what kind of drug a suspect is on just by the way they act. Officers are careful when dealing with suspects who are on drugs but only are able to do so much before they have to use force to ensure their

Moreover, to limit officer’s discretion on unjustly use of deadly force, law enforcement agencies need to adopt new practices and techniques when dealing with the public if deadly use of force is not required. Officers should adopt new practices of using the taser as a means of force. “Tasers [are] developed to subdue suspects with non-lethal means” (DeLone, Thompson, 2009, p.416). Many law enforcement officers praise the use of tasers as a tool to “increase the safety of both officer and citizen by decreasing the use of deadly force” (DeLone, Thompson,2009, p.418). Individuals who are not complying/showing aggression with officers and or have some sort of weapon can be easily subdued and controlled with the taser rather than being shot at

On March 11,1989 the first releasing of the documentary show Cops was released on American television. In 1993 the show had won the best televison show award and had earned four Emmy nominations. The show was ranked for the longest television show in the United States in 2011 and also made over $500 million. Cops was produced and released to show viewers how society works throughout living the average life. Cops was manufactured to also reveal the authority lines of work that they include on a everyday basis.

According to Use of Tasers by Law Enforcement agencies, the intention of the Taser program is to encourage deviation from killing a violent offender to simply immobilizing a violent offender until all parties are safe and that specific area has been secured. The decision to use such force is left to the discretion of the officer to dictate the intent of the individual in question and to determine what the meaning of safety is at that particular time. This cultural change can be achieved through education of all of the previously mentioned: the weapon itself, the effects the weapon can have on a human body and discretion.

Use of fire arms as the choice weapon by police officers have been around since the late 1800s. Police departments started issuing firearms to police officers in a response to better-armed criminal populations, (Bulman, 2010). Recent studies have shown that less lethal weapons decrease the rate of police officers and suspect injuries. Because evidence supports less lethal weapons for police officer, many law enforcement agencies have agencies are stressing the use of less-lethal weapons. In the early 19th century, the less than lethal weapon of choice was the wooden club, (Bulman, 2010). Less than lethal weapons have evolved to technology such as conductive energy devices (CEDs), commonly known as the Taser.

With so much going on in the world today, it is very important for officers to be cautious and alert at all times. Consequently, “violence is a major hazard in police work” (Doerner,2016). Nevertheless, I feel that when an officer is attempting to make an arrest, the type of force needed is depending on the type of resistance given from the civilian being handcuffed. Police officers sacrifice their lives every day, even when they are off duty. However, I am not saying this to give anyone a pass to take anyone’s life, but just saying in general, it is the police officer’s duty to protect and serve. Therefore, if the officer is making an arrest, his ultimate goal is to get the bad person off the street to make our lives a safer place. Consequently,

The author disagrees with tasers because, it’s cause pregnant women also have shocked children, the elderly. For people with weak hearts, though, a strong shock can cause a heart attack. It also can affect the hearts of people taking medications. Doctors say that the current is more intense in a small body. The voltage could cause damage in developing nerves, muscles, and brains. There are mostly tasting innocent people. I disagree with using 50,00,00 voltage of tasers. They tasing innocent people in this article. The taser involved of 100 deaths and tasers shot 50,000 voltage of electricity.

This proves that taser is an effective non-lethal weapon that can be used to subdue the criminals. Here are some possible advantages of taser guns, first, taser is a non-lethal weapon. As we may have already know, tasers are meant to take down the suspects without injuring or killing them. Also, it is safer to use in a situations where there are many bystanders in the scene, since tasers do not harm people around the intended suspects. This also leads to the second point of avoiding the usage of lethal weapons. So far, 1689 people have been killed by the police in a crime related actions (May, T. 2014). By promoting the usage of tasers, police officers around the world can lower the number of suspects being killed in the scene. Using the lethal weapon also dangers the suspects, police, and the bystanders, because firearms are a lethal weapon that can take away lives easily. Tasers also requires minimal training to use the functions, which also makes the officers and other security related people to easily use tasers in action. On the other hand, typical fire arms requires more training time to properly use them in order to avoid any accidents with it. Fourthly, by using taser, the injury rates dropped significantly. Taser have been used within law enforcement agencies from 1998, and from that time, according to the Taser International, taser helped lower injuries among officers and