One of the debates that I liked and thought was interesting was that should monetary and fiscal policymakers try to stabilize the economy? This debate is quite interesting but a bit hard to pick a side. But if I was to pick a side it would be that policymakers should not try to stabilize the economy. In part I choose this side of the debate due to the fact that I leaned a little more on this side of the debate. One of the reason why I thing policymakers should not try to stabilize the economy is that for one policymakers tend to have a long lags and due to government bureaucracy it takes a long time to implement certain policies into effect. Let say there was another economic crisis and the government and its policymakers tended to not agree with each other on how to solve this crisis, thus, delaying the treatment of this crisis. …show more content…
For this reason policymakers shouldn’t stabilize the economy due to inefficiency and short term descriptive solutions that doesn’t take into account long-term normative impacts as result of these polices. In some cases these policies do more harm than good and even the opposite goals of what the policy was intended for, thus exacerbating the situation at hand. That is why I feel certain economic policy should be left out the government and all economic responsibility should be handled by an independent organization with oversight but with lots flexibility in order to solve these economic issues, for instances the federal reserve handling of the economic crisis of 2008 showed that this could be
The government should have a strong role in solving a national crisis especially when it comes to the economy. They
Well I guess you could look at that question as one of the roles of policy. To bring fairness to the economy. Now to jump into chapter twelve; inevitable political debate. There a truly going to be endless and infinite amounts of political debates for as long as we shall live here on this earth.
The federal government responded to the crisis that affected businesses and Industries many ways. The Federal Reserve has been most successful in its double full-employment, low inflation mandate when it relies on fixed rules, and keenly looks on the intermediate term rather than trying to respond to short-term developments under political pressure. A number of policies were resolved to react on the emphasis of intermediate term stability on the handling of the
When the Federal government has to find ways to regain any money lost they lean on the expansionary Fiscal policy and the monetary policy to regain money into the economy. Whether, a change in taxes or even government spending. Even to the three major tools of the expansionary monetary policy to focus on. In the first part of this paper, I will discuss the expansionary fiscal policy and how the Federal government was involved and the changes that needed to be made to taxes, government spending. The second part of this paper, I will discuss the monetary policy and the tools the Federal Reserve used when under this policy. The expansionary fiscal policy was out to kick start the economy, and the expansionary monetary policy was out to change interest rate, and influence money supply. When discussing these two policies you have to think about one aspect when will it ever stop? Will a policy always have to be part of the economy to help the government one way or another?
The government should not be involved in the economy because too much government involvement can lead to a socialism and eventually communism. As in the Gilded Age many people lived in the absolute worse conditions. Such as working, payment, housing and just the area was horrible. Today still some on this happens here in America but mostly in other areas of the world. As history can tell you socialism and communism never works out for the government or the people.
Government must however put in place some safety net for check and balances. example protection of jobs
Monetary policy is the regulation of the money supply to influence variables such as inflation, employment, and economic growth. Fiscal policies, on the other hand, use the ability to tax and spend in order to influence those same variables (McEachern, 2014, p. 57). A blend of both of these policies is essential for improving the economy when a recession has occurred.
How can monetary policy and fiscal policy greatly influence the US economy? Keynesian economics says, “A depressed economy is the result of inadequate spending .” According to Keynesian the government intervention can help a depressed economy through monetary policy and fiscal .The idea established by Keynes was that managing the economy is a government responsibility .
This policy is results in faster results to speed up the economy for the short term. Fiscal Policy is later used to develop a plan of yearly actions and is a long term way to stabilize the economy. The next idea to stabilize the economy is a theory called monetarism which is the belief that if government did not interfere with the market economy that employment would be high and inflation low. Followers believe the government is the reason of downturns such as the recent recession.
Our economy is a machine that is ran by humans. A machine can only be as good as the person who makes it. This makes our economy susceptible to human error. A couple years ago the United States faced one of the greatest financial crisis since the Great Depression, which was the Great Recession. The Great Recession was a severe economic downturn that occurred in 2008 following the burst of the housing market. The government tried passing bills to see if anything would help it from becoming another Great Depression. Trying to aid the government was the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve went through a couple strategies in order to help the economy recover. The Federal Reserve provided three major strategies to start moving the economy in a better direction. The first strategy was primarily focused on the central bank’s role of the lender of last resort. The second strategy was meant to provide provision of liquidity directly to borrowers and investors in key credit markets. The last strategy was for the Federal Reserve to expand its open market operations to support the credit markets still working, as well as trying to push long term interest rates down. Since time has passed on since the Great Recession it has been a long road. In this essay we will take a time to reflect on these strategies to see how they helped.
I have never really focused on the issues that our economy is facing; therefore, I find reading articles like these rather interesting. They provide me with material and questions I would not have looked up before. My favorite quote from the article was, “Monetary policy has been keeping the patient alive, creating the possibility of a lasting cure through fiscal and structural operations,” as stated by BoE Chief. I thought this line to be very funny and blunt. The comparison of the nation to a patient really put into perspective the how tragic our economic system is doing. Also, I have come to belief that people are okay with the monetary policy because it has been providing some relief to our problems, but people must find an actually solution,
In the U.S. the Government still maintains some control of factors of production and responsibility to maintain a steady economic pace. It uses a mix of two types of economic policies for achieving economic stability, fiscal policy and monetary policy. The congress established that monetary policy to promote effectively maximum employment, stable prices and interest rates is to be the main objective of the Federal Reserve, the nation’s central banking
The appropriate role of government in the economy consists of six major functions of interventions in the markets economy. Governments provide the legal and social framework, maintain competition, provide public goods and services, national defense, income and social welfare, correct for externalities, and stabilize the economy. The government also provides polices that help support the functioning of markets and policies to correct situations when the market fails. As well as, guiding the overall pace of economic activity, attempting to maintain steady growth, high levels of employment, and price stability. By applying the fiscal policy which adjusts spending and tax rates or monetary policy which manage the money supply and control the
Thus, critics argue that monetary policy is a more effective tool to fight recessions. Christina and David Romer demonstrated that fiscal policy rarely reacts with the immediacy necessary to enact change during a trough in economic activity. Romer finds that there has been no significance to discretionary fiscal policy during troughs, while monetary policy has a seemingly significant role during historical recessions. John Taylor agrees, stating that even in the face of the lower bound of zero on interest rates, additional measures such as quantitiative easing would prove effective countercyclical policy. Ultimately, both economists reach the conclusion that there is no significance to discretionary fiscal policy during a recession, instead determining that monetary policy is the more effective tool.
Theories about how the economy works and what will happen in the economy where there is monetary policy or fiscal policy intervention are appropriate in assisting policy-makers understand the possible implications of decisions they make or are under consideration. However, they are rarely complete models and often outcomes cannot be predicted. Reintroduction of a theory suggests that new evidence in support of the theory has been reported.