Why Do Standardized Tests Taker's Intelligence?

I kept thinking, what could I do to make an impact on this issue? I was so fascinated, I eagerly studied mental disorders by reading articles and watching scholarly films. At UF, I have taken more measures towards this speciality by devoting my time towards volunteering in the Psychiatric unit at Shands. The derivation of my passion was not from something optimistic neither was it a life long

On days I was unable to pull myself out of bed, I would read Furiously Happy while under my covers, staring at the ceiling and dealing with the many voices that kept clawing and breaking each layer down that built a fortress of self-doubt and underwater volcanos of self-loathing. Many people do not understand these feelings that blossomed inside, and therefore bring their own selective perspectives about mental illness devaluing my human in brain experiences. Explaining to them proved to be harder.

Forms of standardized testing have been around since the Sui dynasty time period, in which the Sui and Tang dynasties conducted imperial examinations in order to test those that hoped for government positions. Many other cultures have adopted it as well and refined it into almost an art form; for example, the United States. The United States began to conduct standardized testing around the time of the First World War; these tests measured the abilities of soldiers in order to give them jobs according to their results. Although the approaches to standardized tests are very different, the same general concept is the same. Since then there has been an increase of standardized tests: SAT, ACT, ASVAB, TAKS, STAAR, and EOC’s, just to name a few.

The definition of success and routes to success may be different, but it is undeniable that all people want to succeed in their lives. According to Malcolm Gladwell, success is seen as an achievement coming from hidden opportunities, effort, diverse backgrounds, or cultural legacy, in life. However, I believe education is one of the factors that contribute the achievement of individuals. There are flaws or inequalities in the United States’ education system, and one of these is the use of standardized test which is the issue that comes in between the individual and their successes. In order to increase the chance of success for an individual, standardized testing should be revoked from education because it does not measure the creativity and knowledge of students which play important roles for one to succeed.

Today is test day, an obstacle that in time will falsely decide a student’s future academically and morally. He has one chance to portray his academic performance in such limited time, having to forcefully disregard whether or not he is in fact emotionally prepped on the given day. There is an unnecessary surplus of students who share such experiences, who too have had their dreams and talents ripped by automated grading. This tale is nothing new, such senseless obstacles have troubled generations. Standardized tests are not a valid measurement of academic success and should be discontinued due to their one-size fits all curriculum, inaccurate performance judgment on a given day, and inefficient test taking times.

Years ago mental illness was perhaps the most misinterpreted and mistreated illness. It is a disorder that is characterized by disturbances in a person’s thoughts, emotions, or behavior. At one time it was a sickness that no one would dare talk about. The humiliation was so strong it was looked upon as a crime. Patients would be “put away” not to be treated but to protect them from the community. It was an illness to be ashamed of and was thought to be brought upon by patients themselves. Mental illness refers to a wide variety of disorders, ranging from bipolar disorder or depression, to post-traumatic stress disorder, and schizophrenia. Each one of these disorders can cause anywhere from mild distress to those that impair a person’s ability to function in normal day-to-day life. In the movie “Call Me Crazy: A Five Film”, it looks at how each individual copes with mental illness and succeeding in everyday situations. By comparing similarities in the film with the differences about mental illness in ordinary life we can understand how the movie at times exaggerated mental disorders.

Why do we take so many standardized testing each year? That is a question that students at my school ask all the time. The end of the school year is the best and the worst time. Summer is right around the corner, but we still have all our standardized testing to take. It causes so much pressure and stress for all students, teachers and even some of the parents. It is one test for your subject to prove everything you know and have been learning the whole year. I do understand how there is pros and cons of standardized testing, But I believe that the cons overpower the pros. Standardized testing has not improved student achievement (Is the use of standardized testing improving education in America?)

IN ATTEMPT TO REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF TIMES I BECOME DISTRACTED BY MYSELF, I MUST LEARN TO CONTROL MY THOUGHTS.

Do you feel that standardized testing has benefited the way that students learn in the classroom? Has it hindered their learning?

I agree with Rachel's post because she mad a lot of valid points. She explains how standardized testing is a sort of equalizer that fairly tests every student. In addition, she explained that while testing standards are good, there are some important drawbacks. One being that the standards are vague and this difficult to implement. This also poses an issue in how students are prepared for standardized testing; are they taught important concepts or are they taught how to take the test? Rachel made a great point when she explained that some aspects of the PARCC testing are online and so students must have some form of computer literacy to complete them. For students who don't have access to a computer or wireless internet, they may struggle with

Another issue that is standing in the way of students’ success is standardized testing. Standardized testing is unnecessary, it uses up a considerable amount of time and resources are wasted. In many school districts, standardized tests results are becoming the most cucrial point of school performance, that should not be the case, the focus should be that each student is prepared for the future responsibilities that they will have later in life. As a result, teachers feel an immense amount of pressure to make sure that test scores rise consistently, this pressure sometimes leads to teachers tampering with student scores to get more favorable results. Schools also spend large amounts of time and money securing assessments to make sure that there is no cheating, however students are still likely to cheat on tests as more pressure is placed on them to perform well. Schools Change the curriculum to match the test, and teachers tend to cover material that will likely be on the next assessment, standardized testing doesn’t help students

I think that one standardized test cannot determine how smart a student is or how well a school is doing. One test can simply not show how smart a student is because one test is not a accurate representation of the student’s knowledge.

Standardized tests are annoying little things that students in schools all across the nation have to take every year. Though, if all the facts are taken into consideration, they do not really seem worth it, do they? Many people speculate whether or not they are actually measuring a student’s intelligence or anything like that. It seems that students do not necessarily have to learn the material, only memorize it for a short period of time. The question has to be raised, though-- what exactly qualifies a test to be a standardized test? Well, as described by The Glossary of Education Reform, there are two main things that make a test standardized. The first being that the test “...requires all test takers to answer the same questions, or

There are many factors that provide the proper setting, tools, and skill development to become more efficient and knowledgeable in literacy. Educators and policymakers today are learning that we cannot rely on standardized achievement as the sole measure of student academic success. Standardized tests are not authentic applications of how students apply knowledge to complex situations and do not prepare the soft skill that create 21st century ready students (Suhr et al., 2010; Grimes & Warschauer, 2008). These tests are just one indicator of achievement, and don’t truly measure the growth students make on a daily bases seen through ongoing formative assessment of student competencies. The research tells us that we need more rigorous research studies on achievement data to provide statistically significant evidence to support the connection between one-to-one programs and student achievement.

The debate on standardized tests and its adequacy in testing a student’s knowledge about a subject has been going on for many years. Tests, in general, has been around for centuries and without them there would not be progress and no gleams of progress. Students ranging from elementary school to high school have experienced standardized testing. Teachers, educators, and parents are also involved in the students’ lives, which revolves around the tests, one way or another. There are many views on standardized test. However, the three most common views are: educators who are for standardized test which benefits students, educators who are at the other extreme of opposing standardized tests, and educators who view tests are a benefit if done in appropriate amounts.