Why Do Taxes Go?

The American Revolution began when all of the laws and taxes were being passed on to the Americans. The Americans eventually fought for and won their independence by rebelling against the British Parliament. Britain's laws made for the Americans were only an advantage to the British, which was unfair.

“Art is a nation's most precious heritage. For it is in our works of art that we reveal to ourselves, and to others, the inner vision which guides us as a Nation. And where there is no vision, the people perish,” (Johnson). President Johnson’s speech before signing the Arts and Humanities Bill, which began the National Endowment for the Arts (“Lyndon B.”), was inspiring to artists in all merits. The National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) is a federal program that provides grants to art programs, ranging from dance to music to visual art (“About the NEA”). Numerous Americans believe federal funding to the arts is not important, while countless organizations depend on the grants given. Individuals against the NEA believe that the benefits of the

If the government takes away all of the Arts Funding, how will the kids express themselves? Kids need an outlet to express themselves in whatever way they choose, and I feel that art is the best way. Art helps kids more than the government knows,

Although the society is never going to come to an agreement, if the government gets rid of the National Endowments for the Arts, our nation would diminish its love and insight of the world. Art is more than what we see from the eye, it affects us as a person and how we connect with others, it’s important for me because it doesn’t compel my decision on how I want to build my future. Learning more about the National Endowment for the Arts, wanting to help is simply by spreading the word among friends and donating to keep the program alive. I admire the NEA and my love for the arts has grown and more people should understand and appreciate

Artists should be able to present their art in any way about anything. However government fundings cause artists to lose their freedom with their artwork. Artists love to express their artwork freely and show off their work. Art is everywhere and anyone can be a artist and no one should be able to take away the freedom of art. Artists shouldn’t be pressured by the government to make specific types of art; artists express themselves and their art their own way.

According to ordinary concepts of “resident”, an individual should satisfy the “Common Law test”. In this particular case, Andy spends the last three years working in Thailand, having signed a contract with a Canadian company in Australia, which doesn’t fulfill

The College Board did a study in 2012 that showed arts students’ SAT scores on average were 91 points higher than those of non-arts students. “Data from The College Board shows that students who take four years of arts and music classes while in high school on average score about 100 points better on their SATs than students who took one half-year or less. Additionally, those who had more than four years of arts and music scored 105 points more than those who had only a half-year or less of arts instruction” (Americans). Arts education also helps motivate students to stay in school and out of trouble. According to an article by Law Street Media, “Art classes are beneficial for students in many ways, but especially for children who are low-income and live in impoverished neighborhoods. Art programs can keep at-risk youth off the streets, and, consequently, away from correctional institutions. Not only can art programs provide incentives for these children to stay in school, but it can also improve their academic performance, including reading and math. At-risk students with a history of art involvement have higher college enrollment rates than their at-risk peers who didn’t pursue art education. They are three times more likely to earn Bachelor’s degrees than their peers. Students who didn’t take art classes are five times more likely to drop out of school before graduation. Art can help disadvantaged children to realize their full potential as it provides a safe harbor for those students who may lack a supportive environment at home” (Metla). This means that arts education helps improve the chances of success for a student who might otherwise struggle to consistently attend and stay interested in

Public art catches an abundance of attention and the artist receives so much recognition, there’s no need for the government to show it off even more. Instead of the government using their money for art, they can use it on more important things, such as employment and education for people who have no money to do so. With the government investing in art, they will not benefit from it a whole lot. They will be able to show it off to the public but will receive nothing from this.

No Child Left Behind (NCLB) was passed in 2004; and it declared art and music core subjects, like geography, math, and english. At the time it was lauded as a huge step forward for arts educations in public schools, However, as art wasn't given a part of the test standards, its status as a ‘core subject’ soon meant very little. A report by the Department of Education reported that, “Schools in some states report the amount of instructional time devoted to reading, writing, math and science has increased, while for the arts it has declined.”(Ruppert) Because schools had to focus on improving students success in math and english, or risk losing funding, art was cast aside so that precious time could be used teaching the parts of the core curriculum that were tested. It is time to reverse that trend of art not being truly valued by the American education system. If schools were given incentives for providing an arts education, it would help to connect people to art in a more meaningful way. This would lead to the spread of effects like those felt by the community around the Little Black Pearls Community Center. Art has been approved in a study done by the American Journal of Public Health as an activity that will help to reduce stress: “Engagement with creative activities has the potential to contribute toward reducing stress and depression.”(Stuckey) By giving funding and attention to art will give an opportunity to teach teens a health way to deal with stress, and an effective method of dealing with stress that they can use for the rest of their life. But despite the good changing the education system would do, there are many, many obstacles. It would cost Americans lots of money in taxes, take an incredibly long time to become approved and an even longer time for the effects to be felt. For the people who have

Let’s start with that very argument. Why should we be spending money on dusty old art? From the monetary standpoint, many people say that we should be spending our money on other, more important areas of life. While this is a good point, preserving this art can generate the money right back when you auction it off, or even just charging people to look at it. (Museums being a prime example.) There’s one argument out the window.

This is an important development. In 2008, voters were less worried about taxes than they had been in previous elections. Why? Because the 15 years between President Bill Clinton's 1993 tax hike and Barack Obama's increase in cigarette taxes in February was the longest stretch in U.S. history without a federal tax increase. President George W. Bush's tax cuts also cut 13 million people on the lower-end of the income scale from the income tax rolls -- people who don't pay taxes aren't worried about the tax

It has been proven that students in art and music programs are about four times as likely to win an academic award than a student who is not into the arts. This means that students who participate in music and art programs already have a much higher chance of achieving things as those who don't participate in those programs. In school districts today, art has been seen either as a distraction or a value. Although art programs aren’t required in all school, all schools should include some art and music programs because, these programs can only be a good thing for artistic students.

What if taxes never increase and local services disappeared? Would that single mother be capable of paying for her children school or medical bills? Taxes are beneficial to our society because it allows us to be protected and flourish. If taxes were eliminated and local services disappeared, we will not have as many local services and will create an unstable environment.

Most people would agree that music and art programs in schools have a huge impact on students not only academically, but in just about every aspect of their lives. Studies have shown that students who are involved in music and art programs have an overall higher IQ and show signs of many other academic benefits. Participating in such programs also allow students the opportunity to express themselves artistically and show the world their perhaps otherwise hidden potential. We all know how fun it can be to show the world your unexpected abilities, and what better way to show those off than the place where we spend most of our day-to-day lives? Unfortunately, even with all these obvious benefits, when the school budget is short, the first

Mahler entered into a contract to write an article for a magazine. He was paid $20,000 and an additional $10,000 for signing an agreement not to give interviews on television or to journalists.