Why Do We Need Animal Testing?

Have you ever wanted to go into space? Well, many animals did during the beginning of the Space Race and it was very necessary. This was because we did not know if we could even survive in space. We also did not have the technology to figure it out digitally. Another reason why it was necessary was that we had many questions we wanted questions for on how our body would react in space. With these 3 reasons and evidence to go with them, I will show why sending animals into space was necessary.

This claim does not resonate well with the real situation on the ground that many new products are developed and no available information about them exists. The dynamic cosmetics market calls for the development of new products, and they have to be subjected to testing before releasing them. In medical fields, new deadly infections are reported annually, and new treatments and drugs are needed to manage these deadly diseases. Animal testing is necessary, and our responsibility is to administer the animal testing and create the balance of their suffering and the benefits that come

Why would people want to see animals in lab being tested for products we use. Seeing them hurt and look awful is not the best thing to see. Governments funding labs lots of money to help with testing with us knowing and not taking action to change it. By stopping the government funds, it would dramatically drop the number of animals being tested. More than 20 million animals world wide are being tested worldwide. Also, people need to watch the products they use because some/majority of the time the animals are not getting testing with the correct item. That shows that people are rushing the process to get the product out instead of making sure the product was even save for use. Finding another source to test products would help the people

115 Million animals die each year in scientific laboratories at universities and other research industries.Do you want to add to that number or fight the cause.Pharmaceutical industries murder an unimaginable number of animals through animal experimentation.

On one side, animal testing has contributed to many life-saving cures and treatments. Nearly every medical breakthrough in the last 100 years has resulted directly from research using animals. On the other, drugs that pass animal tests aren’t always safe and animal test do not reliably predict results in human beings. 94% of drugs that pass animal tests fail in human clinical trials.

According to the medical schools, the average of the science teachers that use real animals today are 8 of 154. In 1982, 107 of 124 U.S. medical schools used real animals to teach science. In addition, there are a lot of campaigns want to stop that from happening, but also there are a lot of companies are testing their new products on the before they offer them for sale. In my opinion, animals are great creatures and we should save their lives. We should not use the animals on medical test because it can end their lives and it will waste a lot of money.

On the other hand, there have also been several different problems that have occurred because of animal testing. While some animals and humans are genetically similar that doesn’t technically mean they are going to react to a test drug the same as a human would. The drug Thalidomide is a prime example of what can go wrong when using animals to test drugs that humans are going to take. While Thalidomide passed the tests that were ran on animals, but when pregnant women took it resulted in “more than 10,000 children in 46 countries were born with malformations or missing limbs” (Hajar). However, even after this tragic occurrence animal testing has continued to be used in the medical field even though is stopping something like this from happening

Animal research isn’t accurate and shouldn’t be used for animal testing. No human would like to be tested on so why do we test on the helpless animals that doesn 't bring in accurate information . The cure for animals isn 't the same as it is in humans there body is developed differently compared to ours. Animal testing is being doubted why do you ask ? “ drugs developed using mice have to date had 100% failure rate in almost

The creation of a new product, should not cause animals to suffer and die. Because humans want a new lip color or a new type of eyeliner, does not mean that numerous animals should be immensely tortured and at times to death. Many argue that in order to ensure the safety of a product, animal testing is necessary. However, in today’s scientific world, this is not true. Many people argue that animal testing is cheaper, but according to Consumers ' Research Magazine writer Beatrice Hunter, it costs 500,000 dollars per product to test something using animals, as opposed to alternatives, which cost on average 50 dollars per product.

Animals are not made to be brutally burned or blinded and brain damaged daily. Cosmetic testing is not a bad thing when it comes to science, but it is morally wrong. There are 92% of products, that are tested on animals, that fail because they are deemed too dangerous for human use (“11 Facts About Animal Testing”). Cosmetic products should not be tested on animals due to the long-term negative medical effects, alternatives for such testing exists, and there is an abundance of cruelty free products that can be used.

The efficacy and ethical issues of animal experiments on cosmetics are constantly controversial. Today, the rights of animals and the cruelty of animal experiments are on the global scene, and there are more and more organizations supporting the movement against animal experiments. Every year, millions of animals are suffering and dying from painful tests to determine the safety of cosmetics. Materials such as eye shadow and soap have been tested in rabbits, rats, guinea pigs, dogs, and other animals despite the fact that the test results do not prevent or treat human illness or injury. Cosmetics do not need to be tested on animals and there are alternatives that are not animals. It is difficult to understand why some companies are still continuing these cruel and inhumane tests. Like cosmetics, many animals are dying to use animals safely in the laboratory. In recent years there have been various alternatives to using computer simulation, bacterial studies and biochemical analysis, but animal experiments still do not show signs of decline. Do they have to continue animal testing for humans?

This can be said because it is a bad kind of science, since 92 out of every 100 drugs that pass animal tests fail in humans (U.S. FDA, 2006). Tests that fail in human can cause health hazards that may affect the human system differently, since the body structure and system of an animal is significantly different from human structure and system. According to PETA, it is wasteful because of such failures in tests that may the reason for spread of diseases. According to the same source is that such practice is unreliable because of the differences of animals and people, like mice and man as an

To start, look at the scientific limitations to using the animals in the experimenting. “Despite the fact that the scientific world continues to embrace the use of animal testing, many scientists consider this act barbaric and ruthless” (Food and Drug Administration 34). They argue that it is not as reliable to use the animals for the experimenting because it is not certain as to how the animal’s reaction will compare to the humans. Another issue is that some doses of medications for these small animals could be completely different for the humans and therefore is not beneficial and simply a waste. A prime example on how unreliable animal experiments are is a drug called Clioquinol. According to the Food and Drug administration, “This drug was declared safe in stopping or controlling diarrhea in 1970s in Japan” (Food and drug administration 37) To the surprise of those scientist who tested this drug, the Clioquinol was what was causing people to have diarrhea. The result of this was fatal to many and left others blind. Along with the previous example, the medical journal in Britain evaluated several scientific reviews concerning the influence of animal experiments in clinical research in 2004 (Food and Drug Administration 37). In many occasions, the research founded by scientist showed that some of the drugs used were dangerous. The results of their studies could later lead to a conclusion that some drugs are dangerous yet scientists are still allowing them to be used. It is

    Unfortunately, i understand that many people believe that animal testing is great and has shown so many results and saved countless lives, But in fact, according to Cruelty free International animal testing is unreliable and 95% of the drugs fail when it comes to human trials. The use of rats, mice, rabbits, and other animals to test whether or not a drug is safe for humans has little statistical insight. A study was shown that out of 93 possible dangerous drug side affects, only 19% of them could have

There are cases where animal testing has resulted in a failure and negatively affected humans. For example, a drug known as TGN1412 was tested on a wide variety of animals including mice, rodents, and monkeys. Specifically, the cynomolgus monkeys were most important to be tested on because they greatly resembled humans structurally (NCBI). After the drug proved to be safe and efficacious, it was tested on six healthy human volunteers. With only a dose 500 times smaller than previously used in the animal studies, “all six volunteers faced life-threatening conditions involving multiorgan failure...”(NCBI). Running experiments in this manner does not always guarantee definite results; there are always possibilities that it will take a turn, as evidenced