According to a Washington News article, “In America there are approximately 270 million firearms owned by civilians, and only 897,000 are carried by police officers. 60 percent of people killed by guns die by suicide. According to the centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Suicide is the second most common cause of death for Americans between 15 & 34”(Washington P,2015) . Guns have led to many controversies, disputes, and over all lifestyle of the average civilians. Gun laws are the main cause of many violent crimes in America and need to be changed so that it is more difficult to obtain guns making it a safer environment to live in.
Changing certain gun laws and banning of certain guns can reduce some of the current gun violence. Every
…show more content…
This would make it easier and safer for police officers and lower crime rates to a minimum. Banning guns like semi-automatics would decrease the amounts of mass deaths for shootings that are meant to kill more than one. The military and higher forces should only use guns of such destruction. “ The more bullets they have, the higher chances of killing more people”(Bjs, 2011). Usually the gun on gun violence is most heaviest in ran down neighborhoods or areas were gang affiliation is high. A Gun Prevention article states,” At least 80% of gun homicides are gang related”(JPFO, 2011). Majority of the crimes and deaths in neighbor hoods that appear on the news are gun related deaths. Meaning the police would not have to worry about being so quick to shoot, where the civilian couldn’t even have the fire arm in the first place without the right credentials. This would make everyday civilians and any other person feel safer. Rather than having to worry if you are going to die or not when getting pulled …show more content…
If there were a major stop to the source of the firearms, it would defiantly decrease the number of people who own them illegally. Most illegal guns are stolen or have a private seller. A PBS article states,” A large source of guns used in crimes are unlicensed street dealers, who either get their guns through illegal transactions or from gun thefts”(PBS, 2014). Stealing the guns only takes away from the enforcements that actually need them for important issues. Not only that, but now the government has to pay to get those guns back. “ The FFl have revealed at least 27,500 guns have been reported either lost or stolen”(PBS, 2014). These are the weapons that are now being sold to people who commit the crimes, increase our death rate, and add on to the current violence. In some cases there can be situations where a firearm is needed.” A national survey finds that nearly half of gun owners (48%) volunteer that the main reason they own a gun is for protection; just 32% say they have a gun primarily for hunting”(P.P, 2016). For example, in many of our past and still existing wars we use all types of firearms. Certified hunters use them to kill animals for the everyday food we eat. Over all banning weapons to a certain extent can not only reduce the death toll in U.S, but could bring us back together as a nation promoting safety
Politicians make the claim that semi-automatic guns are more devastating that other guns and, therefore, should be banned. This sounds logical to those who are not really familiar with guns. In fact, many people confuse semi-automatic weapons with military weapons. However, semi-automatic guns do not fire multiple rounds each time the gunman pulls the trigger; semi-automatic simply means that the gun reloads automatically. Virtually all guns currently sold on the open market reload automatically. Therefore, laws banning semi-automatic weapons would apply to virtually all guns sold legally, and these laws would likely be viewed by the courts as unconstitutional because they would limit the constitutional rights of the
Limiting gun laws and creating stronger background checks will decrease the amount of deaths and make it harder for criminals to own guns. “Dozens of suspected
To make the world a safer place it is going to take every community within the United States coming together to resolve conflict peacefully and respectfully. In doing so, we would see a massive reduction in the crime rate in the United States. We can do it if we try. Having the ability to carry a handgun provides a level of security that people need in their daily lives to feel safe and equal to individuals who have handguns illegally and possibly have the intentions of committing aggressive crimes. Thank you for reading my article on “Why Handguns Should Not Be
Would you rather have people own a gun, especially your neighbors? Firearms are tools intended for harm against others. However, it is also common for people to misuse firearms for their own purpose. People at war use guns to harm others, totaling in millions of death due to guns. Additionally, most crimes in the world involve the use of guns. There are even arms dealers out there illegally selling weapons to the wrong people. Banning specific weapons in general won’t change the fact that people can still kill others with anything. Banning guns in general wouldn't matter to criminals. Weapons such as shotguns, assault rifles, and sniper rifles are still possible to illegally possess. They would still have access to these weapons and its
Anyone who believes strengthening the gun control laws would reduce gun violence is correct. However, if someone wants to kill someone, not having a gun is unfortunately not going to stop him or her. If a gun is not accessible, a person who wishes to kill someone will use another weapon that is accessible, such as a knife or bludgeon of sorts. Banning guns will lessen gun violence, but will bring up a rise in violence with other weapons.
Research shows that whether attempters live or die depends in large part on the ready availability of firearms. A study by the Harvard School of Public Health of all 50 U.S. states reveals a powerful link between rates of firearm ownership and suicides. Based on a survey of American households conducted in 2002, it was found that in states where guns were prevalent—as in Wyoming, where 63 percent of households reported owning guns—rates of suicide were higher. The inverse was also true: where gun ownership was less common, suicide rates were also lower ( Harvard). Many lives could be saved if firearms weren't so accessible. The American government needs to adopt policies that would keep guns out of the hands of vulnerable adults and
If gun control is regulated, then we will have less crime. Access to firearms makes killing easy, efficient, and impersonal, which increases the lethality of crime. Josh Sugarmann, the Executive Director of the Violence Policy Center has once said, "We recoil in horror and search for explanations, but we never face up to the obvious preventive measure: a ban on the handy killing machines that make crimes so easy.”Allowing untrained people to carry guns puts others at risk and it can result in self-inflicting injuries both by suicide and unintentional incidents. Gun violence in America kills more than 30,000 and injures almost 70,000 each year. Guns can be misused and abused, which is why gun
Taking guns away is not going to solve any problems with gun violence. If criminals want a gun they will find a way around the ban and buy a firearm illegally. Taking firearms away would violate our second amendment rights taking away the ability to defend your home and your family.
The United States is one of the few countries were the right to bear arms is protected by the constitution. Unfortunately, it is also one of the most violent with incidents involving guns this year reaching an estimated 36,212 and an approximate 9,050 deaths (“Gun Violence Archive”). There are an estimated 310 million firearms in households across American, these are only estimates because current gun laws do not require them to be registered or tracked. A more staggering estimate is that most of the guns owned by private citizens are semi-automatic guns, the same type of gun used in almost all mass shootings. While these privately owned guns are legally purchased, many times, they land in the hands of criminals, and owners never report them stolen. Mass shootings and gun crimes are not the only issues with gun violence the one never talked about is suicide, more guns available equals more suicides. The United States is one of the easiest countries to own a gun legally or illegally, stricter gun control laws are necessary.
If we get rid of the source of the problem, it will be much harder for the criminals to acquire the guns and hurt people with them. The more guns that are circulating around the US, the higher the risk is for homicides. Another reason is that it will get rid of mass shootings. In 2012, there were
Gun control laws aim to restrict or regulate firearms by selecting who can sell, buy and possess certain guns. Criminals do not obey laws and stricter gun control laws or banning guns will have little effect on reducing crimes. There are many myths about gun control reducing acts of gun violence, which are simply not true according to research. People are responsible for the crimes, not the guns themselves. Taking guns away from United States citizens that use them for many reasons, shooting practice, competition, hunting and self-defense, should not be punished for the acts of criminals. As stated by Mytheos Holt, “Guns in the right hands help public safety. Guns in the wrong hands harm public safety”. Research shows that defensive use of
Some people believe that extremely tight gun control laws will eliminate crime, but gun control laws only prevent the 'good guys' from obtaining firearms. Criminals will always have ways of getting weapons, whether it be from the black market, cross borders, or illegal street sales. New gun control laws will not stop them. Since the shootings of Columbine High School, Virginia Tech, and Sandy Hook, the frequency of mass shootings has increased greatly. Gun control is not effective as it has not been shown to actually reduce the number of gun-related crimes. Instead of considering a ban of private firearm possession, and violating individual ownership rights, it may be more practical to consider the option of partially restricting firearm
With the popular culture providing positive images of guns, the United States has a gun prevalence that is very rare in the modern world. While many people appreciate the “gun culture”, guns are heavily involved in violence in the United States. According to U.S. Department of Justice, since 1960, more than 750,000 Americans have died under firearms, including homicides, suicides, and unintentional injuries. The figure 1 provides a comprehensive survey of U.S. violent crimes for the period from 1993 to 2011.This figure illustrates that from 1993 to 2011, about 60% to 70% of homicides were associated with a firearm. Over the same period, between 6% and 9% of all nonfatal violence, with about 20% to 30% of robberies and 22% to 32% of aggravated assaults involving a firearm.
While mass shootings cause a huge unnecessary loss of life, most killings in the United States come from murders and crimes. Guns should be banned to lower crime rates. Because “more than 70% of homicides are committed with a firearm” (Cannon n.p.) and 2.
The idea of completely outlawing handguns does not solve the problem of handgun violence. In fact, this idea would persuade some people to defy the law and keep their gun or guns for safety or for malicious intentions. One in five Americans own a handgun ("Guns In America"). The chances that all of these people will give up their guns, when they could hide them and likely never get caught, is very slim. The idea of completely outlawing handguns is a tactic