To actualize firearm control, would mean putting considerably advance confinements on the business, purchases, owning and conveying of weapons. This would do two distinct things, neither of which would help the circumstance with crime rates at all. Above all else it would remove firearms from those of us upstanding natives who do comply with the laws put forward to us by our administration since we would realize that having a weapon would be illegal. In the meantime, however, lawbreakers will be unlawfully getting firearms similarly as they illegally do numerous different things now. Due to this
Although many think that taking away firearms would benefit citizens and keep the United States safer, they are wrong. Guns can and are used for self-defense and home protection. Even if gun manufacturing was stopped throughout the entire world, bad people would still find ways to make their own or find people who could make them. Taking away firearms would prevent good people from protecting themselves, their families, and others. Although guns shouldn’t be completely eradicated, there should be a more thorough process for purchasing them. Firearms should not be taken away, but they should be harder to get for people with bad intentions.
While mass shootings cause a huge unnecessary loss of life, most killings in the United States come from murders and crimes. Guns should be banned to lower crime rates. Because “more than 70% of homicides are committed with a firearm” (Cannon n.p.) and 2.
Controlling the availability of guns or even banning guns completely will not rid us of the crime problem that we face in this country.
It is impossible not to open a newspaper, watch the television, or listen to the radio with out hearing about some type of gun violence. Perhaps the main reason for such high gun violence is that guns are so plentiful in the Unites States. In fact, there are sixty five million handguns in America ("The `facts' about Guns"). These guns contribute to an annual medical cost of fourteen billion dollars, which is spent solely on treating gun victims ("Handguns in America"). Not surprisingly, handguns are the cause of eighty percent of homicides, seventy percent of suicides, and almost every accidental shooting ("Youth and Violence"). Handgun violence is a problem that is easy for everyone to see. How to solve this predicament is another
Lives can be saved if guns are restricted from the wrong hands. The Supreme Court has ruled one of many gun law reformations, cited by Supreme Court decision District of Columbia v. Heller, which reiterated the right to bear arms is far from unlimited. (ThinkProcess) In the year since Newton shootings, 39 state laws have tightened restrictions on guns, but 79 states have loosened them. (Associated Press) Many lives can be saved if tragedies are prevented because of the reformation of gun laws. However, guns are also necessary to save lives and to protect others. It was commonly stated throughout the public that guns don’t kill people but people do. Although this may be true, it is also true that guns have the power to take lives. If people restrict gun laws to the dangerous and mentally ill, and to those who have the proper background check, many lives can be saved.
Politicians make the claim that semi-automatic guns are more devastating that other guns and, therefore, should be banned. This sounds logical to those who are not really familiar with guns. In fact, many people confuse semi-automatic weapons with military weapons. However, semi-automatic guns do not fire multiple rounds each time the gunman pulls the trigger; semi-automatic simply means that the gun reloads automatically. Virtually all guns currently sold on the open market reload automatically. Therefore, laws banning semi-automatic weapons would apply to virtually all guns sold legally, and these laws would likely be viewed by the courts as unconstitutional because they would limit the constitutional rights of the
With the assumption banning gun control is highly unlikely, the government could implement an advanced security system among the United States. Luggage, cars and purses could be searched through a metal detector to ensure safety throughout communities. If this security search was implemented throughout neighborhoods, killers would be less likely to successfully proceed with their mass murder. Banning guns, would be far too complex to do. However, if the government established a more efficient and safer strategy to enable people from being granted a gun , then the rate of mass shootings and murders would decrease in
If we get rid of the source of the problem, it will be much harder for the criminals to acquire the guns and hurt people with them. The more guns that are circulating around the US, the higher the risk is for homicides. Another reason is that it will get rid of mass shootings. In 2012, there were
Some people believe that extremely tight gun control laws will eliminate crime, but gun control laws only prevent the 'good guys' from obtaining firearms. Criminals will always have ways of getting weapons, whether it be from the black market, cross borders, or illegal street sales. New gun control laws will not stop them. Since the shootings of Columbine High School, Virginia Tech, and Sandy Hook, the frequency of mass shootings has increased greatly. Gun control is not effective as it has not been shown to actually reduce the number of gun-related crimes. Instead of considering a ban of private firearm possession, and violating individual ownership rights, it may be more practical to consider the option of partially restricting firearm
Some people argue that gun control cannot reduce crime. They believe that strict legislation will not be an effective measure. Even if they present that some states have strict
America has recently witnessed a number of shooting and indiscriminate firing incidents in schools, malls, and villages. Some took their own lives before the police could even respond to the scene. In the end, America keeps losing children, teachers, brothers, and sisters. The population is decreased, but the problem persists. With all these shooting sprees is gun control what we really need? Or is there a more serious problem we are facing here?
There were 19,392 firearm related suicides in the United States in 2010. In 2006, Harvard School of Public Health did a study about the association between the number household gun ownership and suicide. They found out that there more people buy guns and have them in their house, the more people commit suicide. In particular, they found out the non - gun suicides did not have any association with the number of household gun ownership. In other words, the United State’s government should control, or even stop selling guns, to help reduce the amount of