Why Do We Need The Electoral College

One of the reason why the Electoral College should not be destroyed, is that it helps the candidates who may struggle with the popular vote. In 1980, for Presidential Election, candidate Ronald Reagan barely won the popular vote (50.7%). With the help of the Electoral Vote, Reagan took 91% of it, which then made him the winner (Doc B). Also in 1992, Candidate Bill Clinton, did not even have half the country on his side (43%). With the help of the Electoral Vote, Clinton

Third, there was always a large portion of society that opposed the electoral voting system and took actions to abolish the Electoral College. Instead amendments were made to offset complaints.

I agree with that the Electoral College System should be done with. My reasoning for this is in any presidential election, the Electoral College is above the votes of the people of the United States of America. All that a candidate needs when they run for an election is 270 out of the 538 votes in the Electoral College to win the presidency. The Electoral College System over runs the election. It pushes aside the votes of the people and consequently decides who is going to be president for themselves. They say that the American people have a choice in who becomes their president, but it only takes 270 out of 538 of the Electoral College to choose the next president of the United States of America. If the Electoral College chooses who is going to be the next president then what is the reason for the American people to vote? There is

Today the Electoral College is used to find out who becomes president. The Electoral College system is used in most states and this means that everyone who is eligible to vote can go vote in the state that they live in and then the majority vote for that certain state gets all the electoral college votes which is what counts more. Different states have a different number of electoral votes depending on the state’s population. The system that is being used is unfair to the independent candidate and bigger states, therefore the Electoral College should be abolished.

The electoral college system is unnecessary at this point in time. When the electoral college system was thought up in the 1700s by the framers of the constitution, they believed that electors to represent the peoples’ vote would be more efficient since it was extremely difficult to get information to and from places quickly, meaning that citizens would be late on news. To to combat that, the framers created the electoral college system, a system where electors elected by a political party would represent the peoples’ vote, gather in Washington, and vote on their behalf. Because of the lack of technology, this method wasn’t a bad way to vote for presidents efficiently. But technology improved, negating the problem of Americans not knowing the news in Washington and concerning their candidates. Today, Americans have access to current and reliable news regarding their candidates and are generally up-to-date with politics. So with the technological advances present today, why do we still employ an electoral college to vote for our next president? There isn’t a pressing reason to keep it.

Since past and current Americans have given so much for our right to vote, the Electoral College serves as a way to make sure every ballot counts. There are two main reasons why I support this governing body. First, this group has existed since the Founding Fathers created it in 1787 because it adds on to the system of checks and balances our country was built on. Michael W. McConnell, a professor at Stanford Law School, writes, “The Founders opted for the Electoral College because the two leading alternatives, election by Congress and by popular vote, were thought to have serious defects”(McConnell 23). If we were to eliminate it, the system of check and balances so carefully composed over 100 years ago would be ruined. In addition, this section

The United States has used the Electoral College as a way to elect the president for over two hundred years and it is a main reason the smaller states have a chance to voice their opinion. The Electoral College has caused great debate within the US as to whether or not it is a political anachronism. The Electoral College consists of 538 total votes which are then divided up based on the population of each state and at least 270 electoral votes are required for a president to win the election. A consensus is taken every ten years to see if the population of each state has increased or decreased therefore changing the number of electoral votes it will receive. Some people argue that if the majority of the population wants a candidate to be president then that is the best way to elect someone but that is not necessarily true.

In my personal opinion, I think that it would be best if we kept the Electoral College. It worked back then, and it seems

At The Constitutional Convention of 1787, there was a lot of debate over how the President would be elected. Some supported a system of popular votes while most others supported the system we have in place today, the Electoral College. The Electoral College is the best method of electing a President because it allows for the people to be involved in the government while still maintaining that the most educated people possible actually vote for the President.

The reason I say this is because it makes no sense that a presidential candidate can win the popular vote and end up losing the electoral vote. The House of Reps and senators can clearly see that the people want this candidate but, they end up choosing the opposing side. A recent example of this is the presidential race of bush and

Do you believe the electoral college is the ideal method to vote for the next president of the united states? I do not agree with this method of choosing the president and I think the popular vote should be the method of voting instead. In the Electoral College you vote for someone to vote the president for you which defeats the purpose of voting. Especially since that person legally doesn't have to vote for who you want. Also the electoral college makes voting more complicated which differs from the popular vote method which is easier by just counting votes and the winner would be who has the most votes. My last reason for abolishing the Electoral College and using the popular vote method is it would help other parties instead of just the Republican and Democratic parties. As third party candidates never won due to the electoral college being more helpful to the other parties.The electoral college is a complicated and not fair way of voting for the president. The process defeats the purpose of voting and most of the time helps only two parties which give the other parties a very low chance of winning.

Due to technological advances and the internet, popular vote is entirely possible nowadays. However, I believe the electoral college does have a place in our political realm. It is true that a popular vote system would more accurately represent the will of the people, but I believe it would overshadow the will of people in smaller states. Considering that the majority of people live in states with large cities and other urban areas, those who live in rural areas wouldn't be given the same level of candidate attention. If the Electoral College had a split vote system in every state, this would more evenly distribute candidate attention as well as give a more representative perspective of what the people want.

If we remember back to the last election, we can remember that the current president did not win the majority of the popular vote. Some have screamed that this is a miscarriage of justice, that it violated the concept of one person, one vote (Darling-Hammond). I argue that the system worked exactly as it was designed to. We have a very cumbersome election system in this country: a system that was designed for the very purpose of being cumbersome. The Founding Fathers could have created a system that would have allowed for a direct vote of the people for president or even left it in the hands of the Congress to pick one, and yet they chose not to do any of these. They understood that a nation like the U.S.A was going to grow and even in their time they had a diverse group of people with differing ideas of how the nation should be governed. Given all the options the Electoral College is the best system for a nation as large and diverse as the U.S.A.

The Electoral College selects the president of the United States every four years from a two-party final election. The two candidates of the two different parties are selected after a process of voting in every state. Each state gets, depending on their population, a number of electoral votes with a minimum of three votes. There are discussions were the Electoral College is criticized, because there are arguments that support the idea were people are not being represented correctly on each state, not letting the individual’s votes have the value that they should. A president can get elected by winning important states and still getting less popular votes than the rival candidate. How can a president represent the population of a country if the majority of the population did not vote for that person? And why should a state be more important than others? Is an injustice for someone that lives

The electoral college must stay because when it was conceived, the idea was that it would prevent one state from making the choice of the whole country. California is an example of this. California is the most populated state in America, yet with the electoral college they don’t have complete control over the rest of the countries decisions. The state of California is majority a part of the Democratic Party, so it would mostly vote for the democratic nominee. If it was a popular vote system, it would give little room for the rest of America to decide if they wanted a different president.