Why Do We Need To Ban Animal Testing

Animal testing is always a behind closed doors situation. Most people are aware that it is happening yet never give it a second thought. An estimate of more then 115 million animals all around the world, including the most common mice, rats, rabbits, and monkeys, are used in experiments every single year (“11 Facts About Animal Testing”, n.d.). And according to change.org the “USA spends $16 billion dollars annually for animal testing at tax payers' expense.” (“Sign the Petition”, n.d.)

Protesting has been going around the world for many of years. Throughout many years of people boycotted agents a situation they believe, if a wrong or right. One of the biggest areas on where people gather around and protest is when they’re fighting agents animals testing. As well as the years has pasted on protesting on animals, it became more sires in increased in the 1960’s and 1970’s. Many cosmetics companies been testing on animals throughout the years there is also many that have not. The cosmetics line LUSH has been fighting over animals testing for over thirty years and will continue to fight for their right according to the company. When LUSH had first started the company had divided they didn 't ever wanted to test their product on animal. Not only fighting agents animals testing LUSH is also ego friendly; everything they use its plants, oil, and recycle. Since LUSH having to be agents animal testing, policies had created to work with the companies of cosmetics to end the cruelty of animals. The LUSH company say “ This can be done without animal testing …” and it true. LUSH is a company that all there product dills with ones skin to make them fell and look beautiful. If LUSH can test their products other than animals and still make your still looking good then, other cosmetics companies can do the same.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) statistics records the use of roughly 26 million animals per year for animal testing. These test reports in many cases are poor. Although animals were greatly used in the past the effects of treatments on animals and humans can’t be compared. The human body, reactions to toxins, and usefulness of treatments is different because we are different, “While animal’s maybe ‘whole models,’ states Dr. Aysha Akhtar, MD,” they are the wrong whole model because of interspecies differences.” Testing animals for human treatments should not continue to be practiced.

According the top animal advocates, each year millions of animals die due to animal testing. The animals used for testing include monkeys, rabbits, birds, hamsters, cats, and dogs just to name a few. Fortunately, the lives of these animals could be saved if animal testing was outlawed.

The people who work for the ASPCA are dedicated to prevent animal cruelty. If there was a global ban on animal testing, it would end animal suffering for decades. “In short while, the AWA and the IACUC purport to insure ‘humane’ treatment of animals in labs, this system is so limited and plagued with loopholes that these animals have little or no protection,” (“Animals in Science/Research”), there are laws globally that ban animal testing. Unluckily, there are so many ways to avoid these laws that animals still are not protected. The United States Department of Agriculture and Department of Health and Human Services established institutional animal care. These agencies require that research faculties that “also use committees to evaluate the merits of research involving animals and monitor the treatment of experimental subjects,” (“Animal Experimentation”). This means that these agencies watch over the people who test the animals and limit their ability to do the harsh things they do to the animals. There are many ways to prevent animal testing. Some alternatives are different ways and different organisms are applied to enforce this strategy, as well as having a lower demand for animals. Some more are in “vitro (test tube) test methods and models based on human cell and tissue cultures, computerized patient-drug databases and virtual drug trials,

Eyes being injected with chemicals, tests that are causing mutations, an endless cycle of torture. Every life is just as important as another. If all those things were done to humans just to have a better appearance it would be a way bigger deal. Instead scientists are doing this to animals and most don’t seem to care as long as they get their long volumized lashes, their plump colorful lipsticks, their soft hair, their de-wrinkle skin replenishing lotions, no one cares as long as they’re benefitting from it. Animal testing shouldn’t be allowed; It should be banned. Testing cosmetics on animals is not only unnecessary but also cruel and inhumane. Things like mascara aren’t just tested on “gross rats” but also dogs, cats, bunnies, pigs, sheep, monkeys, birds, ferrets and many more cute little animals.

Roughly 26 million animals every year are turned over for animal testing (Procon.org). It has been practiced for thousands of years, with the first instance of animal research dating back to around 500 BC (and even then many frowned upon it). People who are for animal testing voice that it has created life-saving treatment for humans as well as animals. Those who are against it say that it’s an inhumane and cruel form of research, and there are better, safer alternatives scientists can use to continue with their

Animal Justice Project,Animal Liberation Front (ALF),Anti-vivisection Coalition (AVC),Cruelty Free International (CFI),Eleventh Hour for Animals,For Life on Earth (FLOE),The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), these are just some of the organizations that are trying to ban animal testing.First of all, this is a significant about-face for the NTP and the EPA—both of whom have been shockingly resistant to incorporating modern science into their toxicity testing

A rabbit in a testing facility is burned, poisoned, and shocked daily. It hasn’t had the company of other rabbits in a month. It’s been isolated and tortured all in the name of science. This kind of treatment towards animals has gone unchecked for decades under the pretense of scientific, medical, and technological advancement. In reality, animals do not and should not be tested on in the lab, as there are plenty of other more trustworthy alternatives to this abuse, and animal testing provides very little helpful knowledge when applied to humans. Animal testing is unreliable when applied to humans, has many viable alternatives, and is inhumane; therefore, it should be outlawed.

There is a debate in the world today. Some people think they should do testing on animals and some people think they shouldn’t test animal because it’s not right for them to test and kill the animals when they're done. The United States is having a lot of trouble with people testing animals because this group called PETA is trying to end testing all over the world. The PETA is fighting for the animal welfare act. The animal welfare act does not let test on animal.

For a long time, the world considered animal testing as an essential part for finding medical cures and for creating cosmetics. Without observing it from different aspects, people are not aware that these testing are: cruel and inhumane and they waste a lot of government money and resources. Also, there are other alternative options that can replace all the experiments that are conducted on animals. Thus, animal testing is immoral and it should be banned.

Imagine living in a prison, where you don't get to choose what to eat and not know if you will survive or not. You see your friends one by one getting experimented and hear their bloodcurdling screams everyday, not knowing if you will be next. This is the life of an animal in a laboratory. Some may think this doesn't really happen, but this is a very real issue that needs to stop. Every year in the U.S., over 25 million animals are used in biomedical and product testing. Too improve our awareness of the animal cruelty around us, we have to stop being careless, be more fair with animals, and put ourselves into perspective of the animals.

If you have ever taken a medicine, it was most likely tested on an animal first. If the medicine made you feel better after you were sick, then you are in luck, because many times the same cannot be said for animal test subjects. Test animals are very often subject to horrendous living conditions or inhumane experiments Many animals feel extreme discomfort or even die because of this. Another reason why animal testing is unnecessary is because there are many equally or even more effective alternatives to animal testing that are more humane. Finally, animal testing should be prohibited because it could potentially be ineffective because animals generally aren’t the same as humans. People are abusing and killing

Consumers buy products most commonly from brands that they feel provide the best quality. They are also counting on the products to be safe. For example beauty products should not be harmful to the area it is being applied on, and hair dyes should not cause other reactions other than coloring the consumer 's hair. For companies, these are big concerns on their hands to avoid bad reputation, lawsuits, etc. There are many ways these products can be cleared and called safe. What a lot of buyers do not see is that the most commonly used method to check our products is by harming the lives of various animals. Animal testing should not be a permissible testing method that is used in the clinical and cosmetic world of products and

"Over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused in U.S. labs every year". Animal testing is the scrutinization of pets for human benefits. Some believe that it has contributed to many life-saving cures and treatments. These scientific experiments are detrimental and should be banned because they are immoral, cause unnecessary suffering, and they are fallacious and wasteful. Animals are tortured in these experiments and do not have a voice of their own to defend themselves. Considering that 95% of animals are not covered by the Animal Welfare Act. The AWA covered 820,812 animals experimented on in 2016, leaving about 25 million other animals not covered. The AWA is, "The Animal Welfare Act (AWA) was the first federal