Why Do Women Use In Vitro Fertilization

In conclusion, human embryonic research and in vitro fertilization are both ethically and morally wrong. The use of human life to conduct research in order to gain medical knowledge is an inhumane practice. Also, no one

Those procedures make ways for persons that would otherwise have no hope of conception to conceive, and give birth to healthy babies, but on the other hand, as the technology has developed, ethical issues surrounding these methods have as well. Some philosophers like Gillian Hanscombe feels that “it is untenable and uncivilized to deny the right to any individual just on the basis that they engage in a particular type of sex practice.” (class notes) Therefore, in this instance, lesbians and gays should have the right to parenthood, whether it’s by surrogate or by sperm insertion, and it should not be looked at as unethical. When it comes to third-party reproduction or surrogacy, Purdy feels that it is not unethical and “argues that it is routine to do so.” (class notes) Though third party reproduction involves risks and raise many important ethical concerns, she also argues that “parents should guarantee that any child they have possess normal health.” (class notes) Therefore, in her opinion, the creation and selection of embryos is ethical. On the other hand, Michael Tooley opposes her opinion and “argues that the practice is not in principle morally acceptable given our level of understanding but could offer some benefits in the future.” (class

With this reproductive technology, the possibilities for conflict with Jewish law expand. There are three main scenarios in which IVF is used. The first is IVF using sperm and egg provided by the couple with the implantation of the fertilized egg into the uterus of a surrogate. The second scenario is the use of the wife’s egg and donated sperm, with the placement of the fertilized egg in either the uterus of a surrogate of the uterus of the wife. Finally, there is IVF using the husband’s sperm and a donated egg with placement of the fertilized egg in the uterus of the wife, the uterus of the donor, or the uterus of a third-party surrogate. The form that is the most common is in vitro fertilization using egg and sperm belonging to the couple. In general, in vitro fertilization with no donor gametes poses conflicts like those with

In vitro fertilisation (IVF) marks a great step forward in medical technology, and Australia is a leader in the field. IVF is now a popular procedure for couples who are infertile or are having trouble conceiving. However, it raises ethical, moral and legal issues including the rights of an individual, property rights, the definition of human life, scientific experimentation versus a potential human life, religion, costs, and community, medical and taxpayer’s rights.

There are definite advantages in IVF for DNA and genetics in screening for disease and genetic disorders, to help those that cannot get pregnant, helpful for women with blocked fallopian tubes, reduces need for surgery and preventing genetic disease. However, there are disadvantages as well, the cost, IVF success is only 30% and can result in

The two big issues that arise with this research is the way the stem cells are acquired, and what researchers do with the information gathered once it is acquired. According to an article by The Center for Bioethics & Human Dignity called “An Overview of Stem Cell Research”, “Human embryonic stem cells are the cells from which all 200+ kinds of tissue in the human body originate. Typically, they are derived from human embryos-often those from fertility clinics who are left over from assisted reproduction attempts. When stem cells are obtained from living human embryos, the harvesting of such cells necessitates destruction of the embryos.”(An Overview of Stem Cell Research). So basically, to acquire these stem cells which have the benefits of improving others lives, you must take away a potential life. The same article by explorable.com says “A life is a life and that should never be compromised. A fertilized egg should be valued as a human life even if it is in its very first weeks. Destroying human life in the hopes of saving human life is not ethical.”(explorable.com). The main problem with embryonic stem cell use is the ethical issues that come with it. But, one who takes embryonic stem cells into their body must be on medicine to prevent rejection for the rest of their life, which can be extremely cost. Moving on, the not-so-unethical alternatives also have their plentiful of issues.

Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) is a method that allows individuals the ability to biologically conceive a child. Individual’s who use the in vitro fertilization method has the opportunity to identify genetic defects in the embryos by using preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PDG) . However, having this ability raises various ethical issues.

Striving to find that common ground must incorporate patient’s rights and that the pursuit of future technologies in the reproduction area, as with all areas of medicine must calculate patient safety above all else; especially before profitability. For years, procedures such as In Vitro Fertilization has been marketed as a safe viable alternative method for reproduction, but at what cost ethically? According to the article In Vitro Fertilization: The Human

Despite different views about stem cell research, on the scientific and technical level stem cell research does not breach ethical values. Many stem cell methodologies now circumvent embryo death which is at the forefront of this ethical debate. In a process known as in vitro fertilization, “researchers mix a man’s sperm and a woman’s eggs together in a lab dish. Some of those eggs become fertilized and begin developing” which are then “implanted into the woman in hopes that she becomes pregnant” (CIRM). After the woman becomes pregnant and a family is started, the couple is given options in regards to the remaining embryos. They can “continue paying to store the embryos or they can defrost the embryos which destroy them or they can choose to donate the embryos for adoption. [They] can also choose to donate the frozen embryos for research” (CIRM). Embryonic stem cells collected in this way through in vitro fertilization may be viable alternatives to proceed with stem cell research. This very sensitive issue can thus be ethically remediated.

Spriggs, M., the author of “saviour siblings” present in his article his main idea which is to reveal in which specific cases is this method of designing a baby acceptable, under what conditions, and why. He includes in his article different points of view regarding what people, doctors and scientists think of that method. The IVF method of having a baby is permitted under certain conditions and for specific cases, for people who have a history of infertility and genetic diseases. He makes his point clear by saying that this method of designing babies is by no means a “toy” and should be used only in extreme cases. In England for instance, the

When natural conception happens, the sperm fertilises the egg inside the woman 's body. However in the IVF procedure, fertilisation of the egg with the sperm and the first few days of embryo development occur outside the body in a test-tube or a Petri dish, in controlled conditions in a laboratory. In Vitro is actually Latin and it means 'in glass ' referring to the Petri dish where the sperm and egg are put together. The process of IVF can be broken down into seven particular stages. The first step also known as the Ovulation Induction and Monitoring stage is when Hormone drugs are given to the woman to increase the number of eggs developing in her ovaries. Fertility specialist doctors keep an eye on the eggs ' development by using the results from blood tests and ultrasound scans. At the appropriate time, maturation of the eggs is triggered by another drug so the doctor can retrieve the woman 's eggs at the right time. Usually the eggs will be used ‘fresh’, but sometimes eggs are frozen to be thawed and used later. The next step is the Sperm Collection phase where a sperm sample is produced by the man and

But without this method a lot of women and men will not be able to have a family because of medical issues. Just like anything else that is unnatural such as antibiotics, vaccinations, surgery, hair dye, people who are not against it feel that those who are should object to these things. Most people think that we don’t know how our child will turn out and what qualities they will have. But this is not so true anymore. Those who are creating a child through sexual intercourse can actually find out now certain qualities of their future children. And with the IVF technology, it makes it possible which embryo to implant after the DNA analysis is performed. “It is even possible, with preimplantation diagnosis (PID) to implant one identical twin and freeze the other future use” (Anderson). We also are not able to predict everything that will happen with the person that is created. Predictions can be made but it is not possible to know exactly what will happen. There was a poll that was taken by CNN, about 7% Americans wanted to cloned. Therefore, there are people still not agreeing with

When a husband and wife want to have a child, but one or both of them are infertile, they must use alternatives to normal reproduction. In vitro fertilization, most commonly known as I.V.F., is the approach of removing the eggs from a fertile healthy female and the infertile female’s ovaries, removing the nucleic materials from the healthy female’s eggs and placing them into the infertile female’s eggs. Then they take the sperm from the male’s gonads, and then they are transfused inside of the glass science dish called a Petri dish. All of which is usually happening in a laboratory or in a safe environment where the egg can be fertilized by the sperm without being exposed to the outside air. Because in vitro fertilization is still under scrutiny by the FDA and has yet to be accepted, it is considered illegal, although even if an infertile couple wants to go ahead with the illegal act and do in vitro fertilization, it is quite the costly procedure with prices ranging from $5,000 to $20,000 in some

Throughout the years, In-vitro fertilization continues to evolve through uses of and advancement of technology. In-Vitro fertilization treatment can help families who cannot conceive, have damaged fallopian tubes, and women with premature ovarian failures. There are also many disadvantages in the treatment that can lead to multiple pregnancies that risk miscarriages, premature births, and an imbalance of birth weight causing health problems. These disadvantages not only affect the child but can also affect the mother mental, physical and psychological problems. IVF treatment is an ethical issue that can lead to many risks that cannot guarantee a healthy child, cost hundreds of thousands of dollars, and affect women physically and emotionally.

To begin with, I will provide the basic medical facts involving IVF to give a solid understanding of what goes into the whole process and what facts involving this process cause the questioning of the ethical and moral issues. Infertility affects about 4.9 million couples in the United States, or one in every twelve. Approximately one-third of infertility cases can be traced to causes in the female (Encarta). However, a small proportion of infertile