Why Do You Disagree With Tasers

In our research study we hope to show that the goal to Tasers it to provide law enforcement with alternatives to deadly force in order to minimize harm to both community members and police. We also want to show that no use of devices or techniques may be safe to everyone, but that we can't look just

2012). A study examined by The New York Times shows a positive correlation between Taser use and cardiac arrest, stating that these devices have the potential to cause irregular heart rhythms especially if fired at the chest. In the case of Robert Dziekanski, a Taser was applied to his body five times causing him to go into cardiac arrest. In many cases of Taser-related fatalities in Canada, these devices were fired more than once. This suggests that the officers using the Tasers might be considered more reliable for the fatalities than the Tasers themselves. Based on the combination of physiological effects of the Taser and the frequency of overuse, their usage should be discontinued or significantly restricted.

Invented by NASA researcher, John H. Cover, in the 1960’s and 70’s, the TASER® has been widely adopted by police agencies as a non-lethal alternative to guns. While these devices have aided authorities in subduing suspects, it has also resulted in numerous unnecessary deaths. The general perception of the non-lethality of Tasers along with poor judgement on the part of law enforcement has culminated in the over use and apparent misuse of discharge against suspects when alternate options have existed. The following paper will discuss in detail the creation of Conducted Energy Weapons (CEW) and the TASER®; negative medical implications of Tasers and their current use by police enforcement groups; the laws which govern the use of

A controversial topic in today’s policing is whether police use reasonable force or excessive force in certain situations. By definition excessive force is any force beyond what’s necessary to arrest a suspect and keep police and bystanders safe. There have been a number of occasions where an officer has crossed the line and went farther then he or she needed to subdue the person getting arrested. With social media and the constant need to record things on camera many of these incidents have gone viral and caught the attention of the public. This can be helpful in certain cases and at the same time recording an officer puts him in a situation where he knows he is being recorded so he has to be mindful of what he says and does. That can cloud his judgement and put the bystanders in danger as well as himself.

It is safer for the officer to use a taser against a combative suspect rather than using hand to hand combat. Using hand to hand combat puts the officer and suspect at greater risk for potential injury. Researchers conducted an analysis of 12 of the largest agencies on the east coast. The analysis confirms that in those 12 agencies using a taser was safer than using hand to hand combat (Bulman,2010). Tasers are safe when used on a healthy person. Although they are safe to use on health person the officer has to follow the guidelines of the manufacture to ensure the safety of the people. If the person is on stimulant drug while being tased it increases their chance of injury. Those stimulant drugs include methamphetamine, crack, cocaine, ecstasy, and caffeine. Not all officers are trained to tell what kind of drug a suspect is on just by the way they act. Officers are careful when dealing with suspects who are on drugs but only are able to do so much before they have to use force to ensure their

Milgram assured that they’re not deadly but are slightly painful. Milgram reveals to us that, “The effectiveness of the experimenter’s commands may depend in an important way on the larger constitutional context in which they are issued,” (Milgram). Milgram discloses that when the experimenter was in the room, pushing the learner to continue, they commenced the shocking. Even as they heard cries of pain from the learner, they continued on towards max voltage as ultimately no resistance forbade them from doing so. Moreover, Milgram reveals that the teacher alone was the reason as to why

There has only been 26 deaths(because of tasers) from 2003 to the present in Canada. That number compared to the thousands of times that tasers have been used, means a very low death ratio. As well as the possibility of someone dying with a healthy heart from being tasered is also very low. Tasers were not made to deliberately kill someone, but to do the literal opposite.

Ever wondered if use of Tasers should be banned for all police officers in Canada? The Government of Canada must not ban the use of tasers of all police officers in Canada because tasers saves lives, tasers are less lethal weapons, and for the safety of the police officers. Tasers saves lives as instead of shooting someone, they can be tased and still live. Tasers are also less lethal than a gun, reducing the risk of dying. Also, police officers feel much safer by having them knowing they can safely take someone down rather than shooting them.

The reason police brutality needs heavy investigation is to address the use excessive force by the police and when it’s necessary for them to use force. They can use force if they feel their lives are in danger and when criminals refuse to drop their weapons. The current rule of when officers can use force technically makes it easy for an officer to use excessive force and justify it by saying they felt threatened by the other person. This is shown in South Carolina in the case where Michael Slager the police officer shot Walter Scott and lied about it. Slager made it seem like Scott had threatened him with a gun. However; a video of the incident showed Walter Scott’s innocence and Slager was eventually charged with murder but, if the video

Police brutality has been an ongoing issue in the United States for over decades. We the people feel as if our lives doesn’t matter. Question of today, are the officers of the law doing their job, such as severe beatings, choking, shootings, and racism? Racism has played a major part towards African Americans due to color.

According to Use of Tasers by Law Enforcement agencies, the intention of the Taser program is to encourage deviation from killing a violent offender to simply immobilizing a violent offender until all parties are safe and that specific area has been secured. The decision to use such force is left to the discretion of the officer to dictate the intent of the individual in question and to determine what the meaning of safety is at that particular time. This cultural change can be achieved through education of all of the previously mentioned: the weapon itself, the effects the weapon can have on a human body and discretion.

Without giving any warning, Officer McPherson shot Bryan with his Taser gun. One of the Taser probes embedded in the side of Bryan’s upper left arm. The electrical current immobilized him and he fell, face first, into the ground, fracturing four teeth and suffering facial contusions. Bryan’s was arrest and taken to the hospital for treatment by ambulance (Carl Bryan v. Brian McPherson, 2009).

Use of fire arms as the choice weapon by police officers have been around since the late 1800s. Police departments started issuing firearms to police officers in a response to better-armed criminal populations, (Bulman, 2010). Recent studies have shown that less lethal weapons decrease the rate of police officers and suspect injuries. Because evidence supports less lethal weapons for police officer, many law enforcement agencies have agencies are stressing the use of less-lethal weapons. In the early 19th century, the less than lethal weapon of choice was the wooden club, (Bulman, 2010). Less than lethal weapons have evolved to technology such as conductive energy devices (CEDs), commonly known as the Taser.

Stun guns are excellent non lethal self defense weapons for women who want to protect themselves against rapists or muggers.

The major pros for taser gun is that, tasers are non-lethal weapon that can effectively take down the suspects without any violent consequences. However, if tasers are the best weapon for the law enforcers, why every countries around the world isn’t are using this effective weapon. Almost every European nations forbids using tasers in any form. The major issue that taser has controversies with is that it is using electricity on human body. Although taser is known to be safe non-lethal weapon as the Taser International argues, however there are few death of a person who was being tazed. Since taser guns are using electricity, when the subjects are suffering from a heart disease, it might have a negative impacts on the subject, worst case, causing death (Mun 2013). Since police officers do not know whether the suspects of intention has a issue in their body, such situations like this is hard to be avoided. Other cons of taser is over usage of taser on the suspects. As we already know, taser is non-lethal weapon, and due to this characteristic, sometimes law enforcers over uses taser. According to this news article, this man in America was tazed 8 times before getting arrested for being not cooperative to the police (SBS News 2014). If this suspect was suffering from a heart disease or other illness, getting tazed 8 times can be crucial to his body condition. Although the situation is threat to the officers, however