Why Does Using A Period In A Text Message Make You Sound Inssincere Or Angry By Lauren Collister Summary And Response Analysis

In the day where technology is thriving, and the communication through email and text messages are now the common norm, there has been a steady decline and absence on the use of proper punctuation. The slow disappearance of punctuation standards, like commas and apostrophes, indicate the need for change towards the written world. Lynne Truss considers herself a stickler for punctuation, and her book, Eats, Shoots and Leaves addresses the minority of those who regard themselves as punctuation "sticklers" as well. Through the use of humor, figurative language such as relatable analogies and real life anecdotes, Lynne Truss creates a call to action for all the fellow punctuation sticklers: embrace proper punctuation, and require zero tolerance for those who use it incorrectly.

In the article “2b or not 2b”, David Crystal begins with discussing how others such as John Humphry argued that texters are “vandals who are doing to our language what Genghis Khan did to his neighbors 800 years ago. They are destroying it” (335). This is also the common belief of most people. People often argue about the bad points of technology over our language. However, Crystal believes that texting can improve children’s ability to read and write rather than hinder their literacy as many people claim. He also argues that not all texting are done in abbreviated words. Complex messages and institutional messages are often texted in standard form of

The result verified that there is evidence of a decline in grammar scores based on the number of abbreviations in their sent and received text messages (Swayne and Messer). In other words, the word abbreviations and punctuation short-cuts that famously used in text messaging can alter individuals’ ability to recognize and apply proper spelling, grammar and punctuation techniques in writing and daily life communication. If the uses of abbreviations are not controlled from the beginning, both sender and receiver of text messaging will be associated with how poorly they will perform on the test based on the level of standard literacy they have.

We as a society are evolving with each generation to come. We are getting stronger, faster, and smarter. Just as cell phones are no longer square blocks with numbers on them and TV’s are not in black and white, writing itself has also evolved. Once upon a time many wrote and spoke in a Shakespearean form of language and over the years it has evolved into something we call modern English. In recent years, technology has advanced greatly and cell phones have become one of our primary use of communication. With cell phones came a new form of writing called text messaging. Text messaging is used to send short, concise messages to anyone around the world. Often times text messages involve the use of abbreviations which stand for different things and also involves frequent use of emoji’s as a form of expression. This form of writing is now considered informal writing and is not acceptable in academic settings. In Michaela Cullington’s essay “Does Texting Affect Writing?” she touches on both sides of whether texting is hindering students writing or if it’s actually having a positive effect. She then makes is clear that she believes most students are educated enough to know when text speak is appropriate and when it’s not so therefore it has no effect on students. Although, I agree with her thesis, she lacks credibility due to her insufficient evidence. In addition, I also believe

After reading Texting and Writing, by Michaela Cullington, I do not agree with many of her viewpoints. Cullington argues that texting does not affect a students writing. Textspeak, the abbreviation and shortening of words like used when writing a text message, does affect the way a student writes because they use the abbreviations, and their writings tend to lack punctuation. When a writer uses excessive abbreviations on a regular basis they can get stuck in the writer’s head causing them to use them in all of their writings. Cullington did make good points of her own opinion on texting and writing in her piece, but I disagree with her and believe that texting and

Using this strategy is effective because everyone has emotions. How you write your essay you can trigger whatever emotion you want your reader to feel. In "Texting and Writing" by Michaela Cullington does exactly that. For example from the very first sentences, "It's taking over our lives. We can do it almost anywhere....What is it? It's texting!" (Cullington 403). Being informal in an essay can build common ground it's more like you are reading what your friend sent you and how you would speak normally. This appeals to emotions because you can relate. It can express happy emotions or upset emotions that you have dealt with when reading texts from people. Texting has changed how we view words and how we see them. Cullington states, "Each student admitted to using abbreviations in writing on occasion" (Cullington 408). Abbreviations can link back to the first article, "Is Google Making Us Stupid?" As a supporting example that we do not want to read lengthy paragraphs. We see abbreviations as a way out and Cullington does a great job explaining abbreviations, its also all over technology such as

In the article, “Does Punctuation in Text Messages Matter?”, by Shannon Doyne, proclaims that the way people use punctuation in texting and emails is harming people and the world. Her views of how proper punctuation is important is strongly disagreeable because it matters more on what the message means rather than the punctuation. Shannon argues, “Recently, a friend I had dinner plans with sent a text to ask ‘what time’ … And yet the question… felt indifferent, almost cold. Couldn’t she at least bother to insert the necessary character?”(Shannon) Most people would have no problem with the text because it is getting the message clear telling what time as in dinner. The fact that she sent “A half-dozen emails back and forth,”(Shannon) means that her friend is obviously comfortable with her conversations, not trying to be mean. Later on in the article, Shannon points out, “Instead of responding to a text with ‘Can’t wait!!’ I’ll insert a space or two before the mark ‘Can’t wait !!’ … Sometimes I’ll make the exclamation point a parenthetical, as a kind of after thought.”(Shannon) It really does not matter that

“Does Texting Affect Writing” is about Michaela Cullington, the author, comparing two opposing perspectives. The perspective is whether texting hinders the formal writing skills of students or not. Millennials are a population that cannot go a day without looking at their phones so, due to the “increasing use of mobile phones, concerns have been raised about its influence on their literacy skills. No matter if it is sending or receiving a text or checking social media sites, technology has taken over the lives of the young generations. The essay “Does Texting Affect Writing?” in They Say, I say exposes how the significant action of texting and using textspeak, i.e. abbreviations and symbols, may be hindering the writing skills of teenaged students. People communicate using textese to “more quickly type what they are trying to say” (Cullington, 2017, p. 361). Textese is a “register that allows omission of words and the use or textisms: instances of non-standard written language such as 4ever” (Van Dijk, 2016). When these people use textese often, it can become habitual and transition into their school assignments. Michaela Cullington constantly repeats words and uses comparisons and abnormalities for the concerns about textspeak, the responses to the concerns, methods and the discussion of findings on the topic to be analyzed.

As texting has yet become a concern of many parents, teachers, and doctors because of the use of slang and Abbreviation is expanded especially in high schools and colleges. Michaela Cullington, who was a student at Marywood University in Pennsylvania and received a Masters degree in speech and language pathology from Marywood in 2014, discussed in “Does Texting Affect Writing?” about the problem above. In general, Cullington positively confirmed that texting does not have any significant effects on formal writing. Cullington also encourages the use of slang and abbreviations should be approved because of many benefits, or positive effects.

According to Cullington, “texting has a minimal effect on student writing” (367). Cullington, explains that students are very conscious about text-messaging and that they will never combine informal writing into formal writing because they believe that text-messaging with friends is not the same as writing an important paper in school. Nonetheless, Cullington states that Dennis Baron,an English and linguistics professor at the University of Illinois, “suggest students do not even use abbreviations in their text messages very often” (368). Cullington also emphasizes that another English teacher argues that “despite texting, her students formal writing remains solid”

Why Does Using a Period in a Text Message make You Sound Insincere or Angry In the article “Why Does Using a Period in a Text Message Make You Sound Insincere or Angry” originally published in June, 2016 by author Lauren Collister, who explores the different tones that can be hidden within a text message. The author correctly identifies different ways people can show emotion without even realizing in a text message. Periods are one of the “insincere” tones she explains, they tend to be that be perceived as “angry” when written within a text message. however, adding a multiple letter into your conversation switches the tone in a completely different direction. In agreement with the author adding the digital new emoticons is also a great way of

Abbreviations such as lol (laugh out loud), brb (be right back), and ttyl (talk to you later) are commonly used when texting, yet are not really shown in formal writing. Students reported that text speaking formal writing. “Other students use these abbreviations and other speak text in their writing, but catches their mistakes quickly”. (Cullington 364). Supporting her research Cullington asked participants to complete questionnaires’’… the research hypothesized that texting and the use of abbreviations would have a negative impact on students. However, the results did not support their hypothesis. (Cullington 369).

The subject of how technology is changing written English is a touchy subject; many people believe that our current technology is allowing us to become lazy. Text messaging being the ultimate reason we are taking so many short cuts when it comes to writing proper English. There are so many abbreviated words and meanings in text messaging, I sometimes find myself confused when I receive messages from people that I have to google what they are trying to say. I don’t want to respond and assume I know what they are trying say.

Texting is a fairly new form of communication that has taken the world by storm. It became popular around 2001, and originally had its limitations, such as the 160-character limit. But now that technology has advanced, texting has followed along and is now a convenient, casual, and a more immediate way of communicating. So naturally, texting has evolved also in terms of the language used within it. We see this mostly in the form of abbreviations and short hand spelled words. Some people argue that texting has ruined the English language. Studies and observations have shown that the benefits of texting and cyber speak are much more broad then expected. Textisms have been shown to increase phonology skills, brain activity, creativity and provide a relatable outlet for students in education.

We use abbreviations and emoji’s to get our point across. As college students we send so many texting messages that we do not realize that we hold on to those habits of using incorrect spelling and full sentences. Using this way of communication so often has caused college students to carry it over to formal writing projects. Texting is another form of writing, some would believe that it will help with our writing skills but at the same time it making us lose our depth when it comes to writing. Students don’t use a much detail when it comes to writing papers. Grammar gets affected and we get in the habit of abbreviating our words which do not help enhance our writing at all. This articles just goes through saying that texting reflects on a lot more than just students language skills.