Why Don't We Complain Essay

     Any one can say that a law is unfair and unjust. However, who is really willing to accept the consequences for going against an unjust law? Is breaking this law really worth the punishment? The government is the one to decide whether a law is reasonable, but what if a member of the public believes that a law is not? Should he rebel against this law? Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. answered yes to this question and believed that one should speak out against an injustice. They both believed that government had many flaws. Even though they shared many beliefs in many of the same subjects concerning Civil Disobedience, they had many different

We Can But Dare We: A Look into the Use of Social Media in Healthcare

If we are seeing injustice, it is our job to say something because if we don´t, it will only hurt the victim more if we don´t say anything. According to Elie Wiesel, ¨ We must take sides.

“…this government never of itself furthered any enterprise…” (Thoreau, 1). Thoreau states his belief that the government never has its people in mind and only takes action when it will benefit the few rather than the majority. In this elaborate rant, Thoreau criticizes the government and the people who fail to make change in the country. Thoreau heavily relies on ethical and logical appeals to convey his clear message. “This is the whole history of ‘My Prisons’” (Thoreau, 10). Although Thoreau talks about how it is unethical for the country to go to war and promote slavery, to get people to sympathize with him, Thoreau summarizes his experience in jail for partaking in civil disobedience and not paying a tax. This anecdote depicted the country in a terrible light due to Thoreau’s description of the hateful jail experience. Although this strategy does emotionally appeal greatly to the audience, the full essay isn’t effective. Thoreau discusses many topics ranging from his personal experiences to flaws in the government, people, and legislature. In the eighteen pages of “Civil Disobedience”, Thoreau does not use transitional phrases when he switches between topics. Rhetorical questions’ abundance distracted the readers and it more than likely made them forget about the central theme. “Now what are they? Men at all? Or small movable forts and magazines, at the service of some unscrupulous man in power?” (Thoreau, 2). Rhetorical questions are used to evoke thought, but the use of some of them when they are not even related to the main message can distract the audience and make them think about something completely different. Thoreau also alluded to different events and people of the time. He also tended to allude to specific excerpts in literature in which he felt were related to what he was discussing. “Not a drum was heard, not a funeral note, as his corse to the rampart we hurried; not a

Several ideas from Henry David Thoreau about how the government interacts with the public have continued to be expressed by individuals up to present day. Thoreau in his book, Civil Disobedience, shared several of his ideas and reasonings behind his support of a restricted government and why civil disobedience should be legal. An issue of significant relevance in the current American society, which is addressed in Thoreau’s writing, is how and why the government should be limited and how civil disobedience should transpire. One of the current issues that Thoreau addresses in his writing is the problem with an overly assertive government and why people should work to limit the power of the government. Limiting the power of the government

What William F. Buckley Jr. is saying in this quote is that we should make sure to keep passive compliance in check and make sure it isn't controlling our whole population. I agree with what Mr. Buckley Jr. is saying because there are multiple instances of "passive compliance" happening in this society. For example, when I was watching a couple of news networks, such as ABC and NBC, I remembered a video where a group people helped a stuck person under a burning car while there was a single person who didn't contribute to the effort of helping the group get the stuck person. This type of behavior is dangerous for our society because if everyone just started to act this way then who will come to our aid when we desperately need help in return.

For example, in the sixth paragraph, he mentioned how reusable bags affect our health negatively; moreover, he backed it up with evidence. The reader wouldn’t dare to reuse that bag if he or she knew that he or she is jeopardizing his or her health and the health of those whom they love and care about. Additionally, i nth ninth paragraph, he says that in a free society, we should be able to live as we please as long as we’re not taking the rights of other people. When the reader reads this, they’ll remember what their country is based upon. The inner patriot will unleash to defend the rights of the

“Why Don’t We Complain” is an essay written by William Buckley Jr.. He discusses his reasoning for why people do not want to complain in the modern age. The purpose of his essay is to convince people to complain more rather than accepting the conditions around them. He starts off by describing his time on a hot train.

We don’t complain enough. Is the simply and unique argument that Buckley is presenting in his essay. The purpose of this essay is to convince Americans that it’s time to start complaining. Instead of simply pushing aside the issues that are present to us on a daily bases Buckley wants us to confront them head on and to simply speak up. Instead of dealing with hot trains, an unfocused movie screen and long line that is caused from a supposedly lazy worker, we should speak up because we have the power to change the little problems. Buckley is afraid that if we continue to show apathy towards small problems then we will continue this

The establishment of the United States of America 's government was of the people, by the people, for the people. In “Resistance to Civil Government,” Henry David Thoreau through the supplementing of rhetoric devices perfectly argues the ineffectiveness of the government. In addition to outlining the hypocrisy and corruption , Thoreau courageously dots the short comings, responsibilities, as well as, expanding on effective and deliberate initiatives citizens must initiate to implement a more stable and trustworthy government.

Opponents might say Americans are complacent, because their knowledge that they’re privileged is enough to keep them satisfied. Also, all Americans have the right to the “pursuit of happiness”, in which they can still be sanguine no matter their wealth or social status (Declaration of Independence). Those

Nowadays, it is often ambiguous where to set the limit between good moral values and effective government. The United States has spent centuries perfecting and building a righteous structure of government, yet it still has defects, such as unjust laws. For that reason, it is one of the most important matters discussed in American history and philosophy. American citizens expect the authority to work “for the good of the people” and “follow in everything the general will”, however, it was not always the case, according to influential American authors and civil rights activists Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Henry David Thoreau. Although both of their works were written over a century apart, one cannot deny the fact that both of them successfully and nonviolently converted their ideology into action using different methods of civil disobedience. Their goal was to fight for a better just system of law and restore faith in humanity. Despite their different perspectives, they both wanted to eradicate social injustice and argued that people must disobey the authority and take action against an unjust government. Both Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail” and Henry David Thoreau’s “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience” share similar passion and attitudes on the philosophy of civil disobedience and also emphasize its importance, however, their differences are efficiently portrayed through their sense of tone, purpose, and rhetorical strategies. While both of the

The electoral college is made up of 538 members and to win the election you are going to need half of that plus one so 270. I don’t think this system of voting is fair at all and it should be the people that make up a majority of the decision. But at the same time it is also kind of fair in terms of how large the states are. In this case some of the smaller states that have less population get the same voting power as states that have millions of people in them. I believe that is the only way it is really fair without this rule the smaller states wouldn’t really mean anything in the election if it were different.

“There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must never be a time when we fail to protest.” The following quote by Ellie Wisel speaks on the practice of protest and objection to law in a society. Peaceful resistance, is a practice that we face everyday in our cyber invoked world. Our current society, is one that is filled with laws, unjust morals, corrupt practices and the constant fight for money and power. With this, our people look to change, and to fix what they see is wrong.

This contrast between the people’s apparent outrage and their actual lack of action