Why some employees are more motivated than others and implications, do the differences
Some employees are more motivated by others because they have achieved an element of self-efficacy, whereby they can to achieve optimum performance by putting the right amount of energy towards the same. This aspect most often than not comes from an immense form of experience in which people continuously do a given exercise to an extent that they get well acquainted with the job and, therefore, able to deliver high-quality jobs in return. Some employees are also highly motivated as compared to others because they have a high form of expectancy in that they do have a strong belief that they stand to achieve more by doing what they are engaged in with a lot of clarity and determination. Such employees will, therefore, carry out their duties with a high level of enthusiasm because they have a positive alignment towards the work that they have been accorded. Such individuals will also show an element of imitativeness and innovativeness since they are self –challenged and can make decisive actions that are likely to be of great benefit to the organization that they are working for.
Some of the implication that these differences have on us as leaders are that they do encourage us into taking up the center stage and aim to establish better strategies that are aimed towards establishing great levels of motivation towards work. Some of the strategies may come out of proper brainstorming and
Employee motivation is, or at least must be, one of the key issues for directors, managers and personnel managers. The leader must be able to find the sensitive strings of his subordinates, which can be motivated by influencing them to achieve high performance. The correct use of motivation encourages staff to make more efficient use of their knowledge, skills, and talents. In today's turbulent, often chaotic environment, commercial success depends on the employee's talent and effort. Despite the many existing theories and practices, some of the motivation of leaders today remains a mystical term. This is partly due to the fact that people are motivated by different things and techniques.
Motivation is derived from an internal force that provides an individual the opportunity to achieve their needs or goals. People are motivated by a variety of things and often have different motivating factors. Employers should be mindful of individual motivating factors when attempting to motivate staff to increase performance. While some people may be motivated by money, many are motivated by things like: recognition, promotion, and increased responsibility. Once an employer has identified motivating factors they are able to analyze a variety of motivational theories to design and implement a program that will motivate employees to go above and beyond what is expected of them.
According to researcher Lindner (1998), motivated employees are needed in our rapidly changing workplaces to aid in the survival of organizations. Not only is it important to meet the needs of the consumer, it is equally important that to make sure that associates are taken care of and remain motivated. For this reason, Gibson, Ivancevich, Donnelly and Konopaske (2012) “states much of management’s time is spent addressing the motivation of their employees” (p. 125). According to the Encyclopedia of Small Business (2007), employee motivation is the level of energy, commitment, and creativity employees bring to their jobs; the inner force that drives individuals to accomplish personal and organizational goals (Lindner, 1988). Despite its obvious importance, employee motivation can be an elusive quest for managers due to the multiplicity of incentives that can influence employees to do their best work. The reality is that every employee has different ways to become motivated and the knowledge of how to motivate them is key to organizational success. It is imperative that employers get to know the personal needs and wants of their employees in order to establish tactics in which to motivate each of them. Once achieved, “managers are in a better position to encourage and reward employees to behave in effective ways” (Gibson et al, 2012, p.
With this being said, motivation is very complex and is continuously fluctuating over time (Maslow, 1954). Getting employees optimally motivated is very difficult, due to the various components that go into motivation. However, when an employee is positively motivated, they will be able to accomplish any task set in front of them.
Employees should always be motivated; this attracts talent, opens up new channels for innovation and creativity and brings in a sense of satisfaction among them which helps the growth and development of the organization.
The success of any business depends on the productivity and satisfaction of its employees. Employees need to be motivated to work. Motivation can be defined as the inner force that drives individuals to accomplish personal and organizational goals. Motivation can be either intrinsic or extrinsic. For an individual to be motivated in a work situation there must be a need, which the individual would have to perceive a possibility of satisfying through some reward. Intrinsic motivation stems from motivations that are inherent and arise from performing the task of the job itself, which the individual gets a feeling of either positive or negative motivation as a result of
motivated to do the job and complete what is asked of them and also to
If an employee is highly motivated they will perform higher and if they perform higher this may lead to a sense of achievement and a higher motivation.
Motivation is another trait, where individuals perform their best when they are motivated and happy. Workers in an organization can be motivated by rewards, the prospect of learning new skills, or by the knowledge that their efforts will be recognized. The most productive workers
Motivation in the workplace is one of the major concerns that managers face when trying to encourage their employees to work harder and do what is expected of them on a day-to-day basis. According to Organizational Behavior by John R. Schermerhorn, James G. Hunt and Richard N. Osborn the definition of motivation is "the individual forces that account for the direction, level, and persistence of a person's effort expended at work." They go on to say that "motivation is a key concern in firms across the globe." Through the years there have been several theories as to what motivates employees to do their best at work. In order to better understand these theories we will apply them to a fictitious organization that has the following
There are three individuals Ella, Marcelo, and Masoko who are trying to gain a promotion at their place of employment. Motivated employees are needed at all workplaces. Motivated employees help their companies and place of employment survive. Managers need to know what motivates their employees. Of all of the duties of an employer motivating employees arguably is the most complex. This is due, to the part of what motivates employees which changes constantly (Bowen& Radhakrishna, 1991).Each individual is motivated to gain a job promotion using three theories of motivation. The three theories of motivation are biological, psychosocial an interactionist theories of motivation. Motivation is a reason or set of reasons for engaging in a
Motivation is central to understanding behavior in organizations and a key managerial factor. Two aspects of motivation are structuring tasks to satisfy worker and organizational needs and providing the proper direction for worker actions (Stroh, Northcraft and Neale, 2002). There are a number of factors when it comes to the difference in worker performance. One of these factors is related to different levels of ability
Motivated employees have greater attentiveness and are less likely to make mistakes, cause mishaps or be involved in a negative conflict. They also have a tendency to show greater loyalty to the company and have strong attendance. An unmotivated employee will demonstrate the opposite, being dissatisfied with his role in the work environment and therefore, he can negatively affect both the quality of the work as well as how efficiently employees carry out their jobs.
Results from thematic analysis of data found that employees’ motivation on the dairy was affected by the three main categories: workplace relationships and culture, ethnic culture, and affection toward job. Workplace relationships and culture was overwhelmingly the most frequent theme, being coded 62 times. Affection towards job was coded 24 times, and ethnic culture was coded 19 times (appendix C). All three themes indicated effect on work motivation of employees.
Motivation is very important subject in today’s business every organization tries to motivate their employee because of to perform well in workplace and achieve organization goals. This research show relationship between employee motivation and their work performance in the organization also show the relationship between extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. The basic goal of this research is to identify connection between employee and their performance. Also show that intrinsic factors have rather efficacy on relationship then extrinsic factors.