Why European Law ( Eu And Echr ) Has An Impact On The Uk

1945 the UN was born. Out of need for a common alliance to combat the axis powers germany japan and italy. Built on the ideals and traditions of the older league of nations the united nations was seen as an effective way of convening all the minds in the world to put their say in with the rest. An effective way of teaming up against some of the most powerful countries at the time, it's always a good idea to have some friends when you get into a war. Its was drafted by the U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt, and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill. In 1942 26 governments signed the declaration. The declaration states that:

The European Union was initially set up as a means to terminate the conflict that occurred within Europe throughout the 20th century, culminating with the end of The Second World War (WWII) and The Cold War that followed. The EU ultimately aimed to bring the member countries together in order to form an ‘ever closer union’ between the countries of Europe, thus preventing a future battle. The Union started as the European Economic Community (EEC), which was established in 1957, and over the years endured numerous adjustments to form the politico-economic union that we know of today.

European Law is very complex law , within EU law there is various different treaties which are in place. Two most significant treaties which have importance to the legislative process are The Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union.

“[I]n Britain since the invasion of Community design law, the protection of designs has become utterly disparate both in principle and in the morass of detail. The Government should be taking determined steps to simplify . . . and eliminate unnecessary differences in scope and operation of the rights”.

The United Kingdom initially joined the European Union in 1973 for economic reasons hoping to promote trade and form relationships with other states in the Union. In 1975 the UK held its first national referendum on withdrawal from the European Economic Community. According to the poll,” 67 % of Britons voted to stay in the EEC and 32 % voted to leave the union” (GYE). Because of this result the UK stayed in the EU in 1975. Over the past 40 years the European Union has been through a lot of change, many more countries have joined the organization and the EU has extended its control over more aspects of daily lives. These changes have sparked a lot of controversy coming from both the UK public and

This report will look at the benefits and issues surrounding the UKs decision to remain as a member state of the E.U. It will consider the pros and cons of membership, and the various viewpoints of those who remain in the E.U. and those who wish to exit from it. The report will conclude with a comprehensive discussion of results and findings.

‘The jurisprudence of the Courts of Justice of the European Communities has, of course, established that the law of the communities, whether embodied in regulations or directives, must be given primacy, where it is applicable, over the domestic law of the member States.’ …‘

Throughout this essay I am going to be exploring the current issues surrounding the decision of whether or not the UK should leave the European Union. I will be researching and looking at the major issues for those in favour of Britain leaving the EU as well as the issues for those who oppose the decision. Another factor I will be examining is the potential

The European law has affects the current English law by stating which particular bodies of rules needed to be taken into consideration. And the commercial Agents (Council Directive) Regulations 1993 whose passed principles which modified the traditional common-law agency rules has also produced an entirely new and commercially important form of agency.

The future of the United Kingdom has never been so uncertain. The British Prime Minister, David Cameron, is keeping the promise he made in 2015, to hold a referendum on whether or not the United Kingdom should remain a member of the European Union. The referendum will take hold on Thursday, 23rd of June of this year. But the results of the last opinion poll held on April 12th to 14th, show, that the British public is fairly evenly split, as 40% want to remain in the European Union and 39% want to leave. The members of the United Kingdom Independence party and other British keen to leave the Union, argue that the UK and its policy makers are being held back and manipulated by the EU, who make too many rules for business, immigration laws and charges billions of pounds a year in membership fees for little in return and undermining the British interests. However, the UK’s investment in the membership and acceptance of rules of the EU, gives the UK far more benefits by allowing it to grow academically, economically and ensures safety for all its citizens and is therefore better off staying a member of this peacemaking Union.

Various events and decisions, such as the devolution of states in the United Kingdom (“UK”) and the formation of the Republic of Ireland, can be argued as being more critical to the development of Britain than a decision to leave the European Union (“EU”). The legal reform of combining the courts of common law and equity can also be argued as being the most significant legal event in British constitutional history. Past Parliamentary decisions affecting the UK’s relationship with the EU, such as joining the EU and domestically incorporating the European Convention on Human Rights, can be argued as having more constitutional significance than the Referendum. Future Parliamentary decisions, such as a Scottish Referendum, could also be a more significant constitutional event by creating a possible precedent for other devolved states or dominions joining the

1955 saw the start of the Western European Union and talks began at Messina about a European Economic Community, the EEC. Britain maintained a strong opinion when referring to Europe and the EEC. This being scepticism, Britain didn’t take these plans very seriously. Such feelings were clearly displayed, when Britain didn’t even send an Ambassador to the Messina Conference. Instead, in keeping with their, thus far sceptical approach, only an observer was sent on the British behalf, rather than Foreign Sectary of State Harold MacMillan. Britain’s feelings hadn’t changed by 1957 when the Treaty of Rome, which created the EEC, which was signed by the six. Italy, France, Western Germany and the Benelux countries, but not by Britain.

The EU operates single market that allows for the free movement of people, goods, capital, and services between the twenty-eight member countries. The union has also been experiencing various problems such corruption and member countries threatening to leave the union due to some reasons that are best known to them. For instance, in recent times, England has been contemplating on leaving the union. Therefore, the paper will be focused on whether England should consider remaining in the EU from economic, environment, social and geo-political perspective.

The purpose of this assignment is to discuss and analyse if the United Kingdom should remain a member of the European Union or if they should leave. And to also discuss the decision making process used in analysing the assignment.

This article demonstrates how Britain’s cautious approach to integration and its protection of national sovereignty, has influenced EU-level policy and shaped treaties. Although not a complete overview of how the British-EU relationship has played out, this article will identify some key themes in the relationship that have sustained over time. Furthermore, it will argue that fears of the EU’s supranationalist agenda, has contributed to