Why God Allowed For The Existence Of Evil

1703 Words7 Pages
that better represents His image. In short, one is more capable of comprehending the sensible reasons of why God allowed for the existence of evil, if they are able to examine the logical problem in totality.
Without doubt, there are plenty of coherent arguments that can combat the claims steming from the logical problem of evil. Alternatively though, the next objection cannot be addressed in the same fashion. The de jure argument, as known as the plausibility problem, requires a greater emphasis on the emotional consequences, rather than the specific and factual results of evil. The Plausibilty problem is a deductive argument that assumes that Christianity (or belief in God) is unjustafiable and is rationally implausible, given both the quantitive and qualitive calamity measure of evil. Due to the fact that the de jure argument deals more with the emotional impact of sin, its response must be sympathetic to the reality of the opposition’s concerns. Humans undergo and experience unique challenges and adversities as they go through life. Therefore, it is inappropriate and insensitive to attempt to justify the hardships of others using argumenative measures.
Conversely, one should respond to these concerns using positive apologetics or theodicy. This is the justification of the ways of God to men. Rather than pursuing to aggressively defend concepts like the theistic set, the response should simply present reasons for why they trust in God in the midst of evil. As discussed

More about Why God Allowed For The Existence Of Evil

Get Access