Why it is important for Health Professionals not to engage in plagiarism including submission of another person’s work as their own
Health professionals should not engage in plagiarism as it is unethical, dishonest and is form of cheating (1,2). Health professionals are respected and trusted by their colleagues and patients. Engaging in plagiarism damages that trust and respect. A health professional submitting another person’s work as their own can have implications on their career, their field of discipline and their relationship with other health professionals. In medicine, this is particularly important as doctors abide by the Hippocratic Oath and engaging in plagiarism undermines this. Plagiarism is a form of unacceptable academic practice
…show more content…
Patients expect that health professionals are competent to perform appropriate investigations and treatments. However, if health professionals engage in plagiarism then patients can be lead into a false sense of expectation and reality. An example of this is patients assume health professionals during their studies have learnt what medicine to give for certain illnesses and how the medicine should be administered. And now as qualified clinicians are able to apply this knowledge to patients in their care. However, if health professionals were to copy another person’s work in regards to what medications to give for particular diseases, they are not only cheating themselves but also the patients under their care who expect a high level of both professionalism and knowledge from health professionals. This situation is something that must be avoided when treating patients. Patients have a right to expect professional and competent doctors. Thus, submitting your own work and having your own ideas is important when it comes to the treatment of …show more content…
At a student level, the University of Otago can impose a range of penalties for plagiarism including: warnings, reduced marks, zero marks for the work submitted, zero marks for the paper and even exclusion from the university (1). These penalties not only act as a deterrent but it shows the seriousness in which the University views plagiarism. Any one of these penalties can potentially impair a health professional’s training in the discipline of their choice or in the case of exclusion, unable to complete their training entirely thereby having to choose another career elsewhere. At a professional level, plagiarism could be viewed as serious misconduct and health professionals may be referred to a disciplinary committee, such as the Health Practitioner’s Disciplinary Tribunal (5). Again, the possible penalties include: a charge of professional misconduct, a criminal conviction or struck off the register (5). It is obvious from these penalties that plagiarism is dealt with in a serious manner. This is important, as plagiarism is unprofessional, unethical and as mentioned previously can be viewed as theft. These penalties are in concordance with the dishonesty associated with plagiarism. It serves as a reminder and a warning to health professionals what they can potentially face if they engage in a form of dishonest practice or
Plagiarism is a serious issue that may diminish the value of a scholarly work and interferes with the professional growth of an individual. For example, in 2003, Jayson Blair resigned from his position as a reporter for the New York Time because of “alleged plagiarism” (Dolak, 2003). Another case of plagiarism would be Matthew C. Whitaker, an associate professor at Arizona State University who in 2011 and 2015 was accused of plagiarism (Ryman, 2017). In both scenarios, Jayson Blair and Matthew C. Whitaker failed to properly paraphrase and cite sources (Dolak, 2003; Ryman 2017).
Hi all good comments indeed! Within the clinical trials plagiarism is perhaps the commonest ethical issue plaguing medical writing according to the article from Natasha Das and Monica Panjabi: Plagiarism: “Why is it such a big issue for medical writers?”. We have very well described definition in this article about the different types of plagiarism such as plagiarism of ideas, mosaic plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and duplicate publication, etc. In this field we may detected at the level of the author, the reviewer, or the editor so basically the idea is that if the author is doing such practice the reviewer should alert and reject that and in for instance both situation move ahead the editor must stop and ask for correction before publishing
In Charlotte Perkins Gilman's “The Yellow Wallpaper” and Tillie Olsen's “I Stand Here Ironing”, introduces common situations about the two main characters that have totally different outcomes. They dealt with obstacles society handed them and struggled enormously. Their freedom was stripped away and in order to obey people’s wants and needs they struggled with major inner conflicts. They had to deal with neglect and dealt with an immense amount of mental and emotional abuse. In Gilman’s story the woman dealt with mental abuse while the character in Olsen’s story dealt with emotional abuse.
Epistemological assumptions of health professionals vary according to writing situation (formal vs informal). For example, “Medical Ethics” written by Dr. Roger Henderson provides a precise model of conduct for the health provider to follow throughly. This formal work compiles a vast amount of strict theory based knowledge in disciplines such as psychology, sociology, and medicine. On the other hand, crossover texts such as “Doctors of the Death Chamber” written by Atul Gawande detail the failure to uphold this medical standard that has been set and passed throughout generations of medical practitioners. This type of informal work is made up of mostly personal observation and experience from a medical professional on the job. Thus, by having these comparisons, it is almost inevitable to compare anecdotal views of medical practice to modern day procedures. This arises questions on whether this system has succeeded on covering its ethical goals, or whether it has contradicted them from time to time. In addition to this, if it has contradicted its ethical guidelines, on what occasions may this have occurred in today’s modern practices. While many correct paths can be taken on what can be done about this issue, it also inevitably delves into the decisions that can be made by a medical practitioner in order to avoid breaking ethical principles.
Knowing about your own DNA and health reports can help you predetermine about your life changes and ultimately ease the problem. SECOND ONE: According to The Oxford English Dictionary, professionalism is defined as “professional quality, character, or conduct; a professional system or method.” Within my academic training, plagiarism as well as cheating are related to the character and conduct components of professionalism. Understanding and following the rules of cheating and plagiarism shows
As a student, the aftereffects of plagiarism usually occur in a common sequence. The first consequence begins with a verbal warning (“Honor Code”, 2012) and the next offense can come in the form of a written warning. After written warnings are given the guilty party can be suspended. However, consequences of plagiarism can be even further reaching. Suspension or expulsion from the university, or academic institution where research was taken place, can occur. Beyond these outcomes, recommendations for punishment can include counseling and community service (“Recognizing and Avoiding Plagiarism”).
It also has underlying themes that bring up many questions such as the practice of doctoring and the varying issues that come up in dealing with patients. The use of descriptive language also adds to the effectiveness of appealing to the readers ethos in this essay. The doctor lets the reader know his own thoughts
In colloquial language plagiarism is the concept of stealing someone’s piece of work or someone’s idea. It is clear that plagiarising is unjust and immoral, however now a days it is becoming more difficult to come up with original ideas as the media allows students to have open access to all information and the producer or author must be very careful to not use somebody else’s work unintentionally and claim it as theirs. It is important to educate students about plagiarism as it can carry major consequences. The concept of plagiarism with reference to policy will be outlined and also the steps helping students and authors to avoid plagiarism in this assignment.
The paper analyzes the existing ethical academic dilemma of applying plagiarism within diverse academic works by students in general and nursing students in particular. It presents particular examples of well-known plagiarism cases and allows properly evaluating the reasons and ways of avoiding any acts of intentional and unintentional plagiarism. It emphasizes the necessity to avoid plagiarism in order to avoid diverse legal and reputation complication as well as expulsion of students.
Hi Gloria , accepting credit for other people work is cheating , unacceptable and dishonest personalities. While in high school it was not uncommon to see this practices and it carried over into adult hood. According , to Bultas, Schmuke ,Davis & Palmer (2017) “students’ frequency of dishonest behaviors in the classroom increased, the frequency of dishonest behavior in the clinical setting also increased”.This unacceptable practice is detrimental to patient’s care. Personally I have seen nurses and physicians copy paste notes from others colleagues as their own. Pasting patient have an arterial line when there is no line, or the fact that the patient is still on a ventilator when the patient was extubated days ago. Unfortunately, this is
Great post. I had not realized plagiarism was so wide-spread and of so high a percentage in such a field as medicine. It would be interesting to see the statistics on plagiarism for other fields in higher education institutions. It is very disheartening that it happens today and is still so prevalent.
“Copying’ or “borrowing” someone else’s words or ideas may perhaps be the more inoffensive way of explaining plagiarism. However, these two terms may deliver a connotation that plagiarism is not much of a serious offense. Whether the act of plagiarising is intentional or unintentional, it is considered as a fraud. In an academic setting plagiarism may even
and had to retake the course in another semester. Another case involving a student who denied plagiarism resulted in the student’s expulsion from the school. The question is how do universities and instructors decide what consequences will be applied to which students? Many schools use the “A-B-C-D-E model (Kiehl, 2006, p. 201), the intent of which is to make the concepts of decision-making models practical, rather than abstract” (Kiehl, 2006, p. 200).“The letters A-B-C-D-E serve as a mnemonic in which A = assessment, B = benefit, C = consequences and consultation, D = duty, and E = education” (Kiehl, 2006, p. 201). Using this model makes it easier ethically to hand down a punishment to a student (Kiehl, 2006, p. 200). In the academic learning environment today, students are surrounded with ideas and thoughts of others. These works can be accessed through written material, electronically, heard in lectures and sermons, or even in class discussions. Without giving proper credit to the author of the original work plagiarism is the outcome (Lowe, 2003). Plagiarism can be intentional or unintentional. In an academic environment students are faced withmany ways to practice intentional plagiarism such as downloading a paper from the internet, paraphrasing without using the proper citations, copying papers from students who may have already completed a course and various other ways. Students
Medical students are entrusted with lots of responsibilities as well as patient information. Thus, probity is a key quality that interviewers are searching for in prospective medical students. Studies suggest that medical students who take part in academic misconduct are more likely to go onto behave dishonestly in their professional practice. Research at Dundee medical school supports this. It found that 32% of students had/would consider plagiarism and 37% of students in the clinical training years reported that they had/would consider filing a clinical examination as normal when they hadn’t actually performed the procedure
According to our readings, "the type of plagiarism deliberate or unintentional has an impact upon the perception of the offence for both faculty and students" (Academic Integrity 2011). This is an important distinction to some people, although the act of plagiarism remains unacceptable no matter why it is done.