Why Is Advertising Bad For Children

Children remeber alot of what they see on T.V. and ad's are one of those thing especially ad's directed to them like toys,games,and clothes. This may sound bad but with the children buying these things it helps the economy grow. It teaches them hopw to be a smart consumer and if they see an ad is bad they probably won't buy that item.

Children are easily influenced, and this can be taken advantage of in the commercial industry. Thy have the desire to fit in and do what is considered “cool”. Many people believe that people use this desire to their own benefit in order to create profit. While it’s true children are easily manipulated by commercials, these commercials and be beneficial to the child's development. Commercials can be used to bring good ideas and good life skills to children that will lead them to being a successful adults. Commercials aimed at children are ethical because they can reinforce positive behaviors and good ideals. This is shown through articles, press and reports.

Children between the ages of 8 and 18 spend a whopping 44.5 hours in front of media sources that are possibly displaying these ads. Research has shown that children less than age 8 cannot tell that the advertisements are merely trying to be persuasive. Children under age 6 cannot even tell the difference between an advertisement and a program. Yet

Many people believe that everything is black and white, especially when it comes to advertisements. What many don’t understand is that everything has an underlining meaning. Every advertisement has been thought out thoroughly to catch the attention of the consumers it is aiming towards. Advertisements aiming towards children has definitely been a topic that many people can’t seem to wrap their mind around. It’s been a topic that many have exposed because of the way marketers are willing to manipulate children in ways that only benefit their own. This whole issue began after the progression of marketing to children during the late 70s and early 80s with the advertisers’ intentions of making children lifelong consumers of products.

I believe advertisements targeting children should not be banned in the United States. Doing so would be unconstitutional due to the Freedom of Press amendment. Advertisements can help children by promoting healthy eating habits while at the same time teaching them that advertisements are just ploys for businesses to get more money.

I feel as if we need to protect childern from targeted advertising. Childern can be persuaded very easily compared to teens and adults. Companys use simple things that catch a child's eye like superheros and toys to make them want something even more, fast food restaurants usually do that type of adertising. In the passage they explain how childern influence their parents to spend $249 billion a year. That number is just going to grow if they don't stop this kind of advertising. Advertising show harmful negative messages to kids world wide. Like smoking, and drinking commericals. They show these type of things like if only "cool guys and girls" do it so it persuades them to want to try it.

In conclusion I believe that the united states should not banne ads just because they think it bothers children or helps parents waste there money Honestly at the end of the day in order for your kids or you to want something u have to let the want of it take over not the tv screen just showing you whats there for takes.You me are human beings our own person .We make our own decisons in life. So lets not blame tv advertiments for our choices when we can make our own

My own opinion on whether or not advertisements should be banned in the United States for targeting children. Well, there's some good and bad reasonings behind this exact situation. Should companys be able to make money? Should companys be able to sell there products online? Should kids not be able to watch T.V.?

It’s deceptive. Children don’t have the cognitive wherewithal to defend against advertising (Kanieski, 2010). Very young children can’t distinguish between a program and a commercial (Tepperman, Albanese, & Curtis, 2014). Until the age of 11 or 12, kids don’t truly understand persuasive intent they don’t understand that every single part of the ad is trying to get them to do something (Moglan, 2014). Furthermore, children have less impulse control and are more vulnerable to

In my own opinion I don't really think advertisment is good for the children right now. I think they should be banned because they influence kids at a young age that certaing foods or certain styles are necessary in order to fit in with the crowd. For

Advertisers trick kids pretty easily. According to the article is advertizing harmful to kids, the harm lies in the persuasive techniques advertisers use to influence kids. Kids are impressionable, and marketing take advantage of sophisticated devices-- demographic data, psychology, developmental characteristics, and behavior traits -- to determine the most effective ways to influence them. It is not good that

Should advertisements targeting children be banned in the United States, no it shouldn't. We're still being advertise where ever we go, whether its school, the internet, bill boards. It's up to the parents to teach their children, teens what's from right to wrong.

To keep the economy running well, advertisement is nessacary. In my personal opinion, i think that it should be limited more. There are to many unhealthy people out there and kids who wont leave the house anymore, because what they are promoting on ads does not involve being active and getting exercise. Some advertisements i believe do have good values. In paragraph 2 of the Protect Children from Targeted Advertising response they said," But kids remember the ads extremely well, and they see thousands each year." If you see thousands of ads in a year, on the same thing , wouldn't you want to try or get whatever it could be? Some ads are products, some are food , and many different things. Fast food restauraunt's are the ads i see the most personally, and i believe that if there were limited ads to certain things, and more ads on things to treat kids,adults, or anyone in a positive way, we would still have a great economy, and also have healthier kids or adults. I don't think that ads should be banned, but i do believe they should be limited, so that people can be healthier."America should be a leader in protecting children, but that is not the case."

The government should exercise more control and limits on advertising that is aimed at children. Children are the leaders of the future and the children watch on average two or more hours of television a day. These are children’s most formative years. When children form ideas that prove to be substance of how they will think as adults.

Advertising today focuses on specific targeted demographic groups. There is a direct focus on marketing products to young consumers. This age group sees the commercials, but does not really understand the directed message. This can have an adverse effect on the way children interpret and understand the message being presented to them. 'The average American child sees more than 40,000 commercials a year, and advertisers spend more than $12 billion annually marketing to them?double the amount of 10 years ago.' (APA-1) Children watching television are exposed to every channel running commercials that are sending out a mature message to an immature audience. There needs to be something done to