Many animals are born with their family, in the open wild where they can live their lives as animals, however additionally many other animals are born to become test subjects or to be experimented on. Some may argue that these tests and experiments will lead to a better cause, however there are many different reasons why testing animals is bad and have been proven to not be successful to the human society. Animal testing has been unsuccessful for a number of reasons, including a sleeping pill created by using animals for it’s tests, called Thalidomide, which has caused 10,000 babies to be born with severe deformities. Thalidomide has been successful to animals, however when applied to humans, it provides negative effects to children that last a lifetime. We have other alternatives to testing on animals, scientists have recently found that we can use test tube models based on human cells and tissue cultures, in addition to computerized models and simulations. Technology is advancing to where there is no further need to test on animals. …show more content…
Furthermore, even if the test on the animal is a success, studies by the US Food and Drug Administration state that 92% out of 100% of tests fail when applied to humans, even when the same test was a success for the animal. We just don’t have the similar species and the chances of succeeding a test from animal to human is way too low. Apes and mice have the same DNA as humans, however when tests applied to those animals into humans, it
Human Society International has conducted many studies over the years and found that animals used in experiments are force fed , subjected to water dehydration and physical exhaustion, or inflicted them with burns and wounds, using other torturing methods to check that the medicines or anything that companies will sell us
Question: What if people were kept in captivity, forced to eat certain things, and get skin injections on a weekly basis? People do not deserve to be treated that way, neither do animals. Scientists are treating animals cruelly due to drug and cosmetic testing. Animal testing is wrong because it is harmful to animals, expensive, and not always accurate.
An issue that is hotly debated is about animal testing. It is clear that overall animal testing should not be allowed. It shouldn’t be allowed because animal testing does not even do much to the humans, because it can hurt or kill the animals, and finally because these animals that are being tested aren’t being protected the right way. Even though that other people could say that animals are a great replicate of humans and can develop cures. Also they could say that it helps less people get sick, it kills the animals by the scientists not protecting them. Overall animals shouldn’t be tested on.
the purpose of testing cosmetics, and the effects of vaccinations needing approval from the FDA. Animals are treated as property by pet owners and are maliciously hunted and slaughtered by humans daily.
Animal Testing is uncertain and hard. Animals go through a series of tests are very painful, most of the time they are not even given anything for pain. Some product tests require the same painful procedure on a daily basis over a weeks' time. Most tests on animals cause permanent injury or even death. The tests performed on animals are not always reliable. A medicine that may be safe with animals may not be for human beings. For example, aspirin is toxic to cats, so if we were to test this medication on cats, it would not help to determine if this was a safe product for human beings. One alternative to animal testing is human testing, if we are looking to find out if the product works on humans, we should test them on humans. That case "No
Ever since animal testing had begun for human research we have been able to develop a ton of cures that have saved millions of lives. This perspective states that animal testing is good because it helps us humans as a species find cures for something we never would've thought the cure would be. Evidence has shown that every big major medical breakthrough in the last 100 years has come directly through animal testing. Without animal testing we would never have had penicillin antibiotics. Penicillin was discovered in 1928 by Sir Howard Florey, but in the 1940’s while testing the penicillin in animals, a researcher injected a lethal amount of bacteria in 8 mice and had given penicillin to 4. The 4 mice that received the penicillin survived while
Being unsupportive of animal rights is utterly inhumane and is the equivalent of murder. The controversial idea that animal rights should not be supported is completely ignorant and simply, it does not benefit you or our society. The cruelty of animal testing as it stands can be eliminated only if we all support animal rights. Extensive amounts of money can also be saved as animals are very inefficient test subjects with results showing complete inaccuracies. How tragic to think that we could earn absolutely no benefit from the death of an animal because of failed testing? Our world is extremely precious, and by supporting animal rights we can transform our world into a better place.
The Science world evolved greatly throughout the past hundreds of years and animal testing was apart of science even back then. Animal Testing started about 1000 years ago, and it is still used today in today's science (" Animal Testing"). One of the first animal experimentation was from around 450 B.C from a Greek Philosopher Alcmaeon ("Animal Testing"). Animal testing is one of the many ways to find out side effects and solutions to many drugs, medicines and diseases. More than 100 million animals are locked alone in a cage. Doing tests and being forced to take medicines, chemicals and be taken in for experiments (Goodman). Even though the animals might suffer from the drugs and medication, they are used to solve and help cure various diseases.
Today animal test subjects such as white rats are used in experiments such as drug testing to make sure it is safe for humans and as a result some animals die. Most scientists live by certain moral most of which are humane unlike Nazi scientists. In their eyes, the perfect test subjects to use were humans, mostly concentration camp inmates. Leading and foremost Nazi doctors were caught and brought to justice before the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg after the end of World War II. The trail exposed evidence of inhumane and immoral human experiments performed at the Buchenwald, Auschwitz, Sachsenhausen, and Dachau concentration camps. Twenty Nazi doctors were charged with war crimes and crimes against humanity. Ever
Animal testing, is it ethical? Does it hurt the animals? Do they die from it? These are all questions you may ask about animal testing. All those questions could go different ways. Some people may think it is ethical, and some may think it is unethical. Does it hurt them, is another one where it could go both ways. Sometimes it depends on the kind of test they do on them it may even kill them. But sometimes it could also be harmless, like when they test the effects of cosmetics on their skin.
A quote from an experimenter showed his view on animal testing “Because the animals are like us.” Experimenters were asked why it is ok to test animals the answer would be “Because the animals are not like us.”
Animals are different than humans in their genetic makeup, and often don’t mimic the same reactions as a humans cells would when testing products. This is why the majority of these tests result in failure. There has been years of research on other methods that can serve as an alternative to animal testing that have come to be more effective. In recent years, Wyss Institute at Harvard University discovered “organs-on-chips,” where human cells are grown on chips in order to mimic human functions. This method of study was proven to be more effective than animal testing, and is more affordable and safer (www.peta.org). Even though this process is not fully developed, products like these can greatly impact how further drugs are tested, and it also ensures our safety. This is why we should invest on other methods of testing, to decrease costs in research, save wildlife, and make our products safer for us to
Since the fourth-century, animal testing has contributed to significant improvement in the length and quality of human lives. Nevertheless, it causes many damages to the animals and surrounded. To reduce the harmful effects of animal testing, The National Advisory Committee for Laboratory Animal Research (NACLAR) set out the international guidelines for the usage of animals for research and scientific purposes. In addition to the harmful effects of animal testing on animals and environment, animal testing is considered unbeneficial to humans. Animals are very different from humans. They have different genes, different proteins, and different metabolic pathways. Therefore, drugs that may be effective in animals may not be safe or effective
Animal experimentation reflects the poor status of humanity. According to “Estimates for Worldwide Laboratory Animal Use” (2005), it is estimated that more than 115.3 million of animals are used in laboratory experiments each year. The animals included are mice, rat, birds, fish , rabbits, guinea pigs, livestock, dogs , cats and non-human primates.
When I apply my favorite blush, I get so happy because it enhances my beauty along with other products I use on my face. What does not cross my mind is that this product was probably tested on an animal. Most women do not realize that most of their makeup has been used on animals. Makeup is a popular product tested on animals among other products that you would never think of. It makes sense for people to kill animals to provide food but why do companies test on animals knowing it could harm them? Animal testing is when experiments are made on animals to test the effectiveness and safety of a product. The purpose of this is to see how the test subject reacts to whatever is being tested on them because humans and animals have a similar physiology. Depending on how the animal reacts to the product, it gives an idea on how a person might react to using the product. This type of research goes back to the days of Aristotle, who was one of the first to perform animal testing.