Why Is Animal Testing Good

Animal have the rights to life. But some of the ancient people have a crazy idea of dissecting pig and get to see what is inside it. But there is a question that people always ask: “Should we test a vaccine, cosmetic and stuff on animals to check it if it safe or not”. It’s a very complicate question because the animal could help us to test the vaccine, cosmetic and check if is it safe for us or it not safe for us. But when you test those things to an animal, it against the animal right. But I will show you the good things about animal testing and the bad things about animal testing.

Have you ever wanted to go into space? Well, many animals did during the beginning of the Space Race and it was very necessary. This was because we did not know if we could even survive in space. We also did not have the technology to figure it out digitally. Another reason why it was necessary was that we had many questions we wanted questions for on how our body would react in space. With these 3 reasons and evidence to go with them, I will show why sending animals into space was necessary.

Human Society International has conducted many studies over the years and found that animals used in experiments are force fed , subjected to water dehydration and physical exhaustion, or inflicted them with burns and wounds, using other torturing methods to check that the medicines or anything that companies will sell us

the purpose of testing cosmetics, and the effects of vaccinations needing approval from the FDA. Animals are treated as property by pet owners and are maliciously hunted and slaughtered by humans daily.

We have cures and treatments for diseases because of animal testing. The laws that are there to protect animals from mistreatment are good too. Since animals lifespan is so short it’s not necessary to put a human life in danger of death when humans live way longer and only 26 million animals are used with a 95% being of rodents, fish and birds. There are the good things of animal testing like the cures for things and protection laws for animals. There are bad things as well such as the damage it can cause and that the damage may last forever and/or kill them, there is also that there is new testing so we don’t really need to test on animals but they are treated as humanely as

Animal testing is used to see the effects of products before the products are put up for human consumption. With this testing, thousands and thousands of animals are kept in cages and subjected to pain and isolation every year. Even though these animals endure this extreme pain for the safety of humans, results are rarely the same in animals as they are in humans. Even though animal testing is deemed as bad science, people say that every major medical advance is because of animal testing. This is not true, since we have vaccines, CAT scans, MRI, and many more advances that are not due to animal testing. Do we even need animal testing? Animal testing is misleading, cruel, archaic, and is not essential to medical research.

The Science world evolved greatly throughout the past hundreds of years and animal testing was apart of science even back then. Animal Testing started about 1000 years ago, and it is still used today in today's science (" Animal Testing"). One of the first animal experimentation was from around 450 B.C from a Greek Philosopher Alcmaeon ("Animal Testing"). Animal testing is one of the many ways to find out side effects and solutions to many drugs, medicines and diseases. More than 100 million animals are locked alone in a cage. Doing tests and being forced to take medicines, chemicals and be taken in for experiments (Goodman). Even though the animals might suffer from the drugs and medication, they are used to solve and help cure various diseases.

First and foremost, testing on animals has led to advancements in numerous areas of medical treatment that has saved thousands of people since the testings began. How? Well, animals have a very similar body structure to humans, which makes them prime examples for testing medications. Chimpanzees have 99% of the same DNA as humans do, and even mice are 98% genetically similar to the human race. Animals and humans both share the same complex, orderly body systems, and for this reason, they are readily used to study animal tissues and the way they react to certain procedures. The tissues can then be compared to the way human tissues would react without having to actually use these human tissues. ”It is a legal requirement to carry out animal testing to ensure they are safe and effective," said Dr. Paul Drayson when talking about the advantages of animal testing and making sure that medical procedures and medications are safe for humans.

The controversy on animal testing is that it 's bad and good at the sametime. It 's based on protecting humans, not simply producing new life-saving drugs although this is seen as a priority another reason is that animal testing involves the inability of animals to consent to the tests. Humans, it is argued, can make an informed decision to consent while animals have tests forced upon them, with no choice. The controversy started in Abuses of animals during testing were well publicised throughout the 1990s and served to create a public frenzy and anger towards animal testing. The increased attention towards animal testing led up to the ban on animal testing.

Many animals are born with their family, in the open wild where they can live their lives as animals, however additionally many other animals are born to become test subjects or to be experimented on. Some may argue that these tests and experiments will lead to a better cause, however there are many different reasons why testing animals is bad and have been proven to not be successful to the human society.

There was a man named Immanuel Kant, who once said, “He who is cruel to animals becomes hard also in his dealings with men. We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals.” This paper will be covering the moral issue on animal testing and whether animal testing is right or wrong. I will be applying the theories of Deontological, Utilitarianism and Virtue Ethics viewpoints on animal testing and then see which moral issue is better.

According to Sean O’Neil, the author of the article “Why Animal Research is Still Necessary” says “Almost every major medical achievement has relied on animal testing at some stage in the process …. as were the polio vaccine, lithium and penicillin.” (O'Neil). Just so you know, penicillin has saved 200 million lives since it’s invention in 1928 (Alexander Fleming). Another example is blood transfusions. Dr. Ananya Mandal, MD says the first successful blood transfusion was done by Richard Lower in 1665. He tested blood transfusions on dogs. Since then, blood transfusions have saved over 1 billion lives, which is significantly higher number than the entire population of the United States (Mandal). If animal testing was not used, then forget about 1.2 billion people getting saved. Ha whatever, that’s just the entire world population of 1850. Some more examples of medicines or knowledge about conditions or diseases being found by animal testing is breast cancer, childhood leukemia, chronic myeloid leukemia, lung cancer, Hepatitis C, heart disease/stroke, epilepsy, and many more (Animal Research Benefits). Not only does an abounding number of animal tests lead to medical breakthroughs, but sometimes a new cure for animals is discovered. An example is insulin. Both people and dogs suffer from diabetes. Insulin was tested on dogs and now helps people and

“ Animal research and testing has played a part in almost every medical breakthrough of the last century. It has saved hundreds of millions of lives worldwide” Joan Ryan, a former UK home office minister, claims that without animal testing, diseases wouldn’t be cured, or there wouldn’t be any treatments for the disease. Without animal testing certain medicines, cures, and biomedical engineering wouldn’t exist or be as proficient. An estimated 26 million animals have been used to test medical vaccines for diseases. Scientists also use animals to test the toxicity of the vaccines. Animal testing may come off as a rather harsh and inhumane form of study when heard about , but without it, global diseases would be spreading faster and possibly everyone will be infected. Nearly every Nobel Prize winner in Physiology or Medicine since 1901 relied on the information based off of animal research. Since animal testing has been used for research purposes many diseases have been cured and are no longer existent and if not cured then the disease is close to being cured.

Thanks to animal research, many diseases that once killed millions of people are now either treatable or curable. Animal testing has not only benefit humans, but animals as well. Some animal testing has lead to life saving and life extending treatments for many of the animals used for testing. A complete alternative to animal testing has yet to be discovered.

2. According to the data in the option, disease cases decreased exponentially with the implementation of vaccine programs, specifically for Measles, Mumps, Hepatitis B, and Poliomyelitis.