Why Is Animal Testing Unethical

Cruelty-free cosmetic brands are an advancement that will better the safety of animals and people. To exemplify, the Sydney Morning Herald states that, “It’s very difficult to work out the health hazards of synthetic hair dyes, sunscreens and preservatives using animal tests” (Page 1). Products used on animals will get different outcomes compared to humans. A product that is made for a human needs to be tested on a human to get accurate results. Testing products on an animal can have certain chemicals that humans can withstand while it can harm the animal. People do not go around using animal products on themselves because of the reactions they can get from them. Additionally, in the text, 3D-printing human skin: The end of animal testing, “bioprinted tissues could also make product testing cheaper and more accurate, cutting down the need for tests on animals” (Mendoza 1). Cosmetic lines are taking the initiative to produce products with no intentions of testing on animals. With the worry people have with side effects of products on human trials; scientists want to see where the options of technology can

When visiting an animal shelter, petting the beloved family dog, or seeing a funny cat video on Facebook, it’s hard not to melt at the sight. Who could ever harm such cute, innocent creatures? It may be hard to think of how that could be possible, yet many companies have no problem hurting animals for their own benefit. Medication brands spanning the U.S., China, Germany, Canada and more test their products on animals daily to approve them for human use. Cruelty Free International and the Dr. Hadwen Trust states that at least 115 million animals may be used in experiments worldwide each year. The experiments administered to the poor animals are cruel and unethical, ranging from breeding them with the purpose of inducing mental illnesses or skinning them raw and injecting them with electrodes and chemicals. Furthermore, research has proved that the results are so unreliable and faulty that the testing is not even necessary. Evidence has proven that animals are subjected to unimaginable horrors during animal testing for the purpose of advancing the modern medical world, yet the entire operation is unnecessary for several reasons.

Many supporters of animal testing believe that the new methods of testing are not going to be as effective as the original method and the results of the tests will not provide as much useful scientific information as the animal tests would. While animal testing seems to be the easiest and most reliable possible way to gather information for human products without causing the humans any pain or discomfort that is incorrect. There are new innovative ways to test for human cosmetic products that may not only be less controversial than animal testing, but also more reliable and effective than animal testing. These new methods are proving to not only be less harmful, but they are also considered more accurate in some cases. One of the new alternative methods that is being used to substitute animal testing is using specific frozen body parts that have been donated to a hospital bank rather than using living animal’s body parts. An example of this is using donated corneas for the Draize eye test rather than inserting the testing substance into the eyes of the animals. An additional alternative is growing human body cells in laboratories and using these cells for testing instead of the animals. These are not only saving the lives of many animals they are also being considered more effective because these test subjects are actually dependable and relevant

Recently, the problem of animal testing has aroused people’s concern. Between twenty-five and fifty million animals are killed in American laboratories each year, and these animals include mice, rats, cats, monkeys and son on. Animal testing is one of the traditional approaches to studying how human and animal bodies work, and it is also frequently used to test medicine and chemicals. For example, a lot of medical students do animal testing to help them learn more about the medical science and finish their assignments. Since the technology has developed, there are all kinds of drugs and chemicals that are manufactured by humans, and animals are increasingly used to make sure the drugs and chemicals work, especially when a new disease is

Animal testing, is it ethical? Does it hurt the animals? Do they die from it? These are all questions you may ask about animal testing. All those questions could go different ways. Some people may think it is ethical, and some may think it is unethical. Does it hurt them, is another one where it could go both ways. Sometimes it depends on the kind of test they do on them it may even kill them. But sometimes it could also be harmless, like when they test the effects of cosmetics on their skin.

Every year, it is estimated that hundreds of millions of animals are used for experiments worldwide (Cohn). In those millions, an estimated 100,000 to 200,000 animals are used to test cosmetics alone (Humane). Scientists shouldn’t be allowed to test cosmetic products on animals because it is cruel and inhumane, there are other effective alternative methods, and it isn’t necessary.

The cosmetic industry is a multi-billion dollar industry worldwide, catering to both men and women. Cosmetics seem to be so pervasive that everywhere you look, you can find some sort of cosmetic advertisement or commercial. Considering this high demand for cosmetics, many companies strive to produce products that will satisfy the consumer. However, in order for some cosmetic companies to manufacture their products, testing is conducted in the expense of animals. In the following report, we will examine many of the adversities that are associated with animal testing while offering some recommendations on how to remedy this issue.

For years researchers in the medical field have used animals as a way of testing medical products without the risk of injury to humans. It has never been one hundred percent supported, but their has been many different reactions to the use of animals in medical research over the last couple years. Many different viewpoints have emerged as to why this form of experimentation is either good or bad. This is no easy decision to say whether or not it should be accepted in our society today or not. For starters, animal testing for medicine and animal testing for cosmetics are two different things. Whether people support this medical research or not, they are in some way sacrificing the life, or multiple,

This reluctance to change is especially unforgivable considering the current wide availability of superior non-animal tests. Instead of measuring how long it takes a chemical to burn away the cornea of a rabbit’s eye, manufacturers can now drop that chemical onto donated human corneas. Human skin cultures can be grown and ordered for irritancy testing. These and dozens more tests now in use today are cheaper, faster, and more accurate at predicting human reactions to a product than the old animal tests ever were.” With other alternatives available to test for irritation and chemical exposure, there is no explanation for the United States to still be using live animals for cosmetic testing. With some countries banning the use of cosmetic testing on animals, there is hope that other countries will begin to as well. The countries who still use animal testing as a way of testing products might recognize why the countries have banned such an act. When the cruelty of animal testing is recognized, countries who still testing with

Cosmetics tested on animals sometimes are affected for humans and sometime not affected for humans. 9 out of 10 drug experimental fail in clinical studies. Most of the test are not applicable for humans. “92% of experimental drugs that are safe and effective in animals fail in human clinical trials because they are too dangerous or don’t work”. “It is not surprising to find that treatments showing ‘promise’ in animals rarely work in humans. Not only are time, money and animals’ lives being wasted (with a huge amount of suffering), but effective treatments are being mistakenly discarded and harmful treatments are getting through”. Even though the experiments tested on animals fail some people still agree with animal testing

Animals should be used in testing to make cosmetic products because it protects the safety of people and the environment. The Animal Research Corporation claimed that animals “Can act as models for the study of human illness” (1). The evidence being stated is showing that this animal corporation has leading evidence that animals are a big help to humans by knowing the fact that researchers are not testing on actual people, to determine a treatment on animals without harming humans. This also gives the scientists a chance to observe if the product they use on animals will have their immune systems respond to and how it can possibly affect humans. All of the calculations and results depend on scientists experiments in their labs. Although animals may die if the product or get really sick from what scientists use, atleast they know that they have proof as to if the product works or not. Life and death of animals that are being used to make consumer products is being used for good purposes that help human’s population. Researchers are using animals instead of humans to keep humans safe and secure. If the experiment that researchers try to study on animals does not work, they will know not to use and approve the consumer

The authors gave a descriptive article on the different types of alternative animal testing for cosmetics. In addition, the authors of this article is affiliated with the Miami Valley Laboratories and Kanebo Cosmetics. The publication of this article was in 2010, which is relatively recent. These authors have published many academic journals concerning the safety assessment of cosmetics. This journal article supports my research question by stating the different possible alternatives of animal testing on cosmetics before they are produced onto

The ethical treatment of animal testing is a controversial topic in the field of zoology. Different aspects on animal testing range from positivity to negativity. Animals such as dogs and rats are used for experimental trials because they have been found to have psychological and genetic correlations that relate to humans. Although the benefits and improvements to modern medicine made it possible to ban animal experimentation completely, animals are still the main subjects in cosmetic industries. Something important to keep in mind when it comes to animal experimentation is that, “Most experimentation has nothing to do

Some experiments include skin and eye irritation to when chemicals of the product make contact with eyes or shaved skin. Scientists do similar actions to rabbits without any pain relief. They also force feed the animals the product that deal with the mouth, such as lipstick, chap stick, and lip gloss to discover any signs of illness or any other specific health hazards like cancer or birth defects. And lastly they determine the “lethal dose.” Meaning, how much of the product would you have to consume for death to occur, inevitably killing the animal being tested. Many animals are killed by suffocation, neck-breaking, and decapitation. Pain relief is never provided for the experimented animals even when they are obviously in discomfort (“Fact Sheet: Cosmetic

This report investigates animal is cosmetic testing. The introduction outlines the focus of this report, the history of animal testing and presenting relevant case studies to illustrate the issue. The discussion provides in depth information about animal testing by presenting two sides of the story. The conclusion will highlight the main points learned to help decide if animal experiments are, indeed, necessary.