Why Is Animal Testing Wrong

Animal testing is a common practice in current life that is necessary to ensure the safety of the humans that will be using the tested product. There are many good and bad aspects of animal testing, but the pros clearly outweigh the cons. Animal testing has been around since ancient times when animals were dissected to gain knowledge about the body and organs. The animals killed from animal testing make up a tiny percentage of the total animals killed every year. When just considering the animals used for food compared to the animals used for testing, testing animals make up a mere 2.6 percent of that number. Public safety far outweighs the lives of the small amount of animals killed.

An issue that is hotly debated is about animal testing. It is clear that overall animal testing should not be allowed. It shouldn’t be allowed because animal testing does not even do much to the humans, because it can hurt or kill the animals, and finally because these animals that are being tested aren’t being protected the right way. Even though that other people could say that animals are a great replicate of humans and can develop cures. Also they could say that it helps less people get sick, it kills the animals by the scientists not protecting them. Overall animals shouldn’t be tested on.

To begin with, why is it done? Animal testing is done to protect humans from bad products that may hurt them, also to find ways to cure diseases that haven’t been cure yet. 95 percent of mice and rats are used for research. Mice represented the largest increase in research with their numbers going from 1.2 million to nearly 1.9 million in that period. Other animals also saw increases (Qtd animal experiment up to 73 percent, study says). Other animals that are used in research are rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, farm animals, fish, and insects, and also less than one percent cats, and dog’s area also used for research. Another reason is to treat injuries and learn more about the animal bodies to find the similarity to the human body (qtd. animal research). Animal testing is inhumane when testing to protect humans. Some people say testing on animals are life changing experiments and with the help of animal experiment can discover blood transfusion, kidney dialysis, and gene therapy for example cystic fibrosis and types of cancer( Coster 7). Others think experimenting on animal is cruel and they suffer a lot. It is true

Animal testing harms and violates the rights of the animal itself. Some people say it is okay because the animal does not know the difference between right from wrong. Animal testing creates a traumatizing experience for the animal. Their bodies become damaged from all the burning and allergic reactions they have to undergo from the chemicals. The animals do not know what is going on, nor do they know where they are because they have been taken out of their natural habitats. The change in environment is new to the animals, making them forced to accept the new area they would call home. Animal testing prohibits an animal from being free. Is it okay to test on animals because they lack the ability to know if the testing being done to them is moral or not? Animals do not have the ability to make their own moral judgment. It is not fair to harm an animal because they are living organisms that play an important role in the ecosystem.

There are some good things about animal testing but also bad things. The bad things of animal testing is that it can either kill animals or cause them long lasting harm. If the animal gets hurt during animal testing then it could heal but sometimes that’s not the case and some animals will suffer from permanent damage. That permanent damage might even be painful. The tests done on the animal may be painful as well. Some of the drugs and products that pass animal testing aren’t necessarily safe. Animals are also very different from people. The animal testing can also mislead researchers to ignoring potential cures and treatments for diseases and illnesses.

A research was done and the results were, “ The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) reported in 2010 that 97,123 animals suffered pain during experiments while being given no anesthesia for relief, including 1,395 primates, 5,996 rabbits, 33,652 guinea pigs, and 48,015 hamsters.” (animal-testing) Animals get no say in what’s being done to them. The scientists can only observe results not ask questions so all animals being tested on are either being tortured or killed. A creatures life is being ruined and wasted just to improve the appearance of another. These animals could be loved in homes as pets or who knows maybe in the wild living their lives in a natural habitat but instead they are being force fed or water deprived or getting their fur disintegrated by harsh chemicals. Just because the animals can’t say stop or express in words

In American society, many groups and organizations are debating whether or not animal testing should be banned. Some people believe that there are reasons why animal testing should be done. Others believe that animal testing is morally wrong. Some experts believe that there are other options available. I believe that animal testing is wrong based on three observations: animal testing is unethical, pointless, and abusive.

Animal testing is a very necessary process for human survival; This is the "survival of the fittest", animal testing helps us know what is safe and what's not. The human race requires accurate results in order to overcome viruses and other fatal extremities. We need animals as a recource for survival. A lion will not refuse to harm a zebra because if he does that lion will die.

Animal testing is extremely unfair for those animals, and it is a kind of cruel and immoral behavior. To be honest, we cannot ignore it. However, when it comes to animals having right to live, eating animals must be mentioned. I want to ask if you care about the feeling of the animals that you want to eat. Everyone wants to live longer, and there is no doubt that animals want to. If animals have right to live as human beings do, why do you eat animals like sheep and chicken? Humans are at the top of the food chain, so it is normal for humans to eat animals, especially the common animals whose number is very large. Those animals used to do research are usually rabbits, frogs and other common animals, and to an extent, animal testing is equal to eating animals. Eating animals can provide energy to our bodies, and sometimes animal testing can benefit mankind and save those who are going to die. We can accept eating animals, so why not accept animal testing? Besides, animal testing is much more beneficial than eating animals. Therefore, animal testing should be

Animal testing is bad because it is cruel and inhumane, animals are different from humans, it’s wasteful animal testing, the welfare act is being violated, and it’s a waste of government money. Why are we allowing animals to be tested on if it’s cruel, wasteful, and is irrelevant? What purpose if there for animal testing? There are other ways to experiment tests meant for humans, according (Save the Animals: Stop Animal Testing), a well-known cosmetics and bath-product company based in London, develop their products that "use natural ingredients, like bananas and Basil nut oil, that are safe to humans, that are established as healthy. It’s a better way to create products than

“Mice are mice, and people are people. If we look at the mouse to model every aspect of disease for man, and to model cures, we are just wasting our time” - Dr. Clif Barry. Testing on animals can be dangerous for the animal that is being tested on. The amount of money that is sent to laboratories in the U.S.A. is outrageously high. Animal testing is not only terrible, but is unreliable more than half the time. Animal testing should not continue to be legal.

Animals are the most used thing to test products on. Animals used everyday to test products damages them mentally and physically. Animal suffer every single day from inhumane testing. Some of the testing that they do is on wild caught primates. Animal shouldn’t be tested on because it’s inhumane to do and is injuring the animals.

For decades, animal experimentation has been a hot topic in society. People debate whether or not it is ethically right. Scientist claim that it is better to test products on animals rather than humans because they think a human life is more valuable than that of an animal. Does animal experimentation have an effect on human results anyway? In fact, “The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has said that 92 percent of all drugs that are shown to be safe and effective in animal tests fail in human trials because they don't work or are dangerous” (“Animal Testing”). There are clinical trials that use humans to be the first of humans to try a new product or medication anyway, so why go through the process of using animals to test it first? There

Animal testing is cruel and inhumane to the animals. We are force feeding them. Forced inhalation. And also, we sometimes are depriving them of food and/or water. This is unfair to the animals who don’t even know what is happening to them.

Mahatma Gandhi once said, “The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated.” Gandhi makes a really firm point by saying that the moral situation of a country or nation can be seen by the way they treat animals. Then why does millions of animals die each year due to animal experimentation. Animal experimentation is inhumane and morally wrong. Also scientifically it is unreliable due to the unknown variables that scientists cannot figure out. The hidden truth is that ninety percent of drugs that pass animal tests fail in humans. Animal experimentation has lost its reliability and ethical values against both humans and animals. Many animals are burned, crushed, shocked, poisoned, and infected.