Why Is Animal Testing Wrong

An issue that is hotly debated is about animal testing. It is clear that overall animal testing should not be allowed. It shouldn’t be allowed because animal testing does not even do much to the humans, because it can hurt or kill the animals, and finally because these animals that are being tested aren’t being protected the right way. Even though that other people could say that animals are a great replicate of humans and can develop cures. Also they could say that it helps less people get sick, it kills the animals by the scientists not protecting them. Overall animals shouldn’t be tested on.

Animals very rarely serve as models for the human body. Many people are brought up with the idea that animal experimentation is necessary to insure the safety of humans, but in reality, these experiments are creating only harm to animals. Animals have done nothing to deserve this backlash, and by educating the public on the true unsuccessfulness of animal testing, the ethical side is forced out in the open. The argument ‘Animal Testing is Bad Science’ by the People for The Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), argues that ethics dictate the value of each life, and that no life is overthrown by another. This well formulated argument effectively integrates ethos, logos, powerful structure, and robust premises to persuade the audience.

Each year more than 100 million animals die due to animal testing. Animal testing is the use of procedures used on animals for medicinal use, diseases, cosmetic products, etc (“ About Animal Testing”).The anti animal testing movement does not only try and prevent the deaths of animals we consider pets but they show how inhuman and cruel animal testing really is. You should support organizations like PETA that prevent animal testing.

A quote from an experimenter showed his view on animal testing “Because the animals are like us.” Experimenters were asked why it is ok to test animals the answer would be “Because the animals are not like us.”

Animal experiments happen all over the world, but are they necessary? People have different feelings for animals; many looks upon animals as companions while others view animals as a means for advancing medical techniques or furthering experimental research. Some say that these experiments are not painful, so they are justified. Where others believe that all these experiments are inhumane, and nothing can justify torturing and killing innocent animals. Although animal testing helps in improving human health by leading to medical advancements, there is no need to physically and psychologically torture innocent animals because studies show that testing on human cells gives better results.

Every year over 100 million animals die after being tested on in labs. They go through terrible and tiring treatments. These treatments go from being forced to inhale toxic fumes, being paralyzed and not being able to fight back, skinned burned off and drilling holes into their skulls.

“Animal testing has been bad of the years and it can even be dated back to the ancient times of the greek. Physicians would dissect animals with the pure interest to obtain knowledge. But even then, one such physician stated that he would rather use a pig as his subject because he wanted to.The ethics of animal testing has always been questioned. Humans do not want to think of animals as on the same level of us. The similarity is terrifying and makes the cruelness obvious. In the 20 century it has been recorded that early scientists who perform experiments and operations on live animals, did not consider animals to be of the same lineage of us and barely cared for them.The remaining are used as test dummies for products. Hundreds of

One of the most controversial topics worldwide is whether or not animals can be used for medical purposes such as drug testing, studying diseases, or making advancements in drug technology. The main issue is the fact that animals are conscious and sentient like us humans. This has led to disagreements in the scientific community regarding animal testing. Some animal organizations such as PETA, The Center for Alternatives for Animal Testing, and the European Coalition to End Animal Experiments have been combatting animal testing for years. Most of the United States however, still accepts animal testing. The ethicality and effectiveness of animal testing is determined through many factors. When all these factors are considered, the necessity of animal testing is conspicuous, and the ethicality can be defended. Therefore, with all the evidence gathered in this essay, I believe that animal testing is justified for medical purposes.

An ongoing conflict among the human species is that of animal cruelty, whether it be by scientific experiments, tests, or research. I frequently wonder, do the individuals performing these atrocious tasks ask themselves if what he/she is doing is ethically correct? I believe that it is not right to treat animals in such an inhumane manner, but to treat them as our own kind, for they are clever, spirited beings. These helpless animals cannot defend themselves against abuse. In my opinion, it is morally appropriate to grant the same rights to animals as we human beings acquire and to end, or even just to minimize, animal cruelty in laboratories. Although there have been some benefits of animal testing for medical prospect, alternative

Animal testing is a practice that has been around for thousands of years. Early Green philosophers such as Aristotle and Erasistratus performed experiments on animals as early as 384 BC (Hajar). Though the way animals are used in experimentation has varied over the years, the modern definition of animal is any experiment that deliberately harms a live animal (“What Is Animal Testing?”). Animals have been used for the purpose of biomedical research and to understand anatomy all throughout history. Nowadays, some of the uses of animal experimentation are to test medications, practice surgical procedures, and test cosmetics. To some humans, animals are inferior beings that are available to harm for their

Currently, Animals experimentation is becoming a controversial topic. As millions of creatures have been tested to benefit human life. A simple definition of this procedure is observing scientific laboratory examinations on live animals. There are many campaigns around the world which reject these tests and request the alternatives. They believe that this kind of experimentation is harmful for people as much as it is cruel to animals while others argue these experiments are substantial for humans live as they are used in important medical research. In this project I will present different areas of this hotly debated issue with an important clarification of the history of animals testing and the common use of it with

However, some people claim that these experiments should be banned due to the harm and pain they cause to animals, thus raising a moral issue whether sacrificing the lives of animals in scientific experiments would really benefit the progress of medical research. On the other hand, many others support the idea of animal testing due to its major role in avoiding scientists with samples to test their products on, apart from human sampling which is considered quite harmful with unpredictable results. Thus, this essay will examine the both ideas with some explanations and evidence.

Everyday, biomedical researchers, ethicists, and government officials have to choose between sacrificing the lives of helpless individuals or innocent animals. Animal testing Is said to be a necessary evil, and without it medical advancement would be severely halted. Medical researchers claim medical progression is their duty to humanity. In order to do their job quickly, animal testing is a necessity. Opponents to medical researchers, animal rights activists argue it isn't humanities right to to take innocent animals lives. They push the medical field to find a better solution.

There have been massive debates and arguments on whether or not researches on animals should be banned. Animal testing is one of the most critical factors to advance human knowledge. It has been conducted for many centuries and has contributed to many medical discoveries. On one hand, there are many individuals who question the validity and procedures involved. On the other hand, opponents of prohibiting animal testing claim that these practices foster several advantages. For these reasons, this topic is considered a highly controversial issue these days. Most scientist express that animal experimentation is a process for a worthy cause and need to continue being practiced for the correct evolution of our humanity. It involves many advantages, including finding cures for deadly diseases, exploring new treatments, and ensuring the lives of humans and animals as well.

Animals are man’s best friend; this is what most people claim, but do they really mean it? Animal testing is widely used nowadays and this method has been used long time ago. Some people agree that animal testing is useful and has some benefits as it helps in discovering new medicines and its side effects so by this method it helps in saving humans lives and some animals too. Animal testing is so inhumane due to the physical pain and cruelty the animals face, some experiments are misleading and some are useless.