Why Is Assisted Suicide Justly Wrong

Physician assisted suicide (PAS) has been debated for many years now. Is physician assisted suicide right or is it wrong? Many people have very different views about this issue. Some supporters feel that people should have the moral right to choose freely what they will do with their lives as long as they do not harm others. This right of free choice includes the right to end one's life when they choose. While you have some supporters who oppose any measures of permitting physician assisted suicide argue that physicians have a moral duty to preserve all life. To allow physicians to assist in destroying someone’s life violates the Hippocratic Oath to "do no harm." Opponents of physician-assisted suicide also believe that better pain management

If Assisted Suicide was to become a law that the states can use it a lot of people with illnesses would die. This means that their family member would be in great grief to find that their family member decided that they wanted to die. The problem is that patients of doctors with illnesses might choose to die if Assisted Suicide is legalized in the States. A possible solution that could occur is that it could become illegal in the States, so that patients could not make a rash decision to kill themselves with drugs. Another possible solution could be that they could only make the decision if their family members and relatives agree. Also, they could only choose this with relative approval if they are 18 or older. If Assisted Suicide is legalized,

Is assisted suicide an act of good or bad, an act of right or wrong? A very controversial topic in today’s talk. Assisted suicide, also known as another individual helping or aiding another individual to end his or her life. A more proper definition is: the suicide of a patient suffering from an incurable disease done by taking lethal drugs. This is very familiar to occur in the health field. Even though it is not legal all around the world, licensed doctors have the permission to medically end an ills patient’s life. Some states want to further enact on this movement. The Humane and Dignified Death Act, is what will allow a physician to end the life of a terminally ill patient only on the request of the patient and the patient is to have valid

Assisted suicide also known as euthanasia is where a terminally ill patient can request a doctor to administer a drug that will end the patient's life. Many people agree with assisted suicide because they like having that option open to them while terminally ill. But that is not the right choice you must live with dignity. Assisted suicide should be illegal because it has not been successful in other countries, doctors have taken advantage of assisted suicide, and it is still taking away a human life.

As a human first with Christian beliefs, physician assisted suicide would be a moral issue for me. It is

This is a case in which those who support euthanasia justify themselves. In most cases euthanasia is usually done by giving a patient a lethal injection or giving them an overdose of medication. Assisting a patient’s suicide can be characterized by a doctor prescribing lethal doses of medication to a patient; “Pharmacists dispense them, sometimes with instructions to ‘take all of this with a light snack and alcohol to cause death’” (American Thinker). Advocates of assisted suicide strongly believe that no one should be forced to stay alive if they do not want to, but the problem with this is that sometimes it is done without the patient’s consent, or without them being in the correct state of mind to know what exactly they are agreeing to. Anyone has the right to commit suicide if they wish to, but euthanasia and assisted suicide is one person aiding the death of another, and that is what is immoral. It changes from the right to die to the right to kill.

When an individual is dying of a disease or illness and death is forthcoming, that a person should have the option that allows for a painless and quick alternative to endless prolonged days, weeks, or even months of suffering. And by legalizing assisted suicide, the individual would be provided with the alternative decision to no longer have suffer the excruciating pain due to the humiliation and the inadequate medical services at the loss of their individual dignity as their bodies turn against them. Although the decision is personal and is up to the individual, which politics, religion and the law should have no place, and the individual who is suffering from imminent death should have the choice to this world as peaceful and with as much dignity as possible. Assisted suicide/euthanasia has an issue since the 5th century and still is a controversial debate today. The ancient Greeks and Romans believed that an individual should have a choice in choosing whether or not to die as long as it was within reasonable rights. Some physicians back then would have a supply of poison for their patients who were terminally ill and wanted to die a quick death.

42% of Americans have had a “friend” or “relative” suffer from a fatal, terminal illness or coma in the last “five years.” More than half of these patients and 23% of the “general public” could not obtain a life-sustaining treatment so, 84% of people approve that a terminally ill patient should be able to choose how and when they die, (NHDD). Assisted suicide - this is defined as the attempt to take one’s life with the intentional assistance of another person, usually a physician, (Duhaime). In five U.S states, physician-assisted suicide is legal, (ProCon). There are certain criteria that terminally ill patients must obtain in order to have the assisted suicide approved. For example, you must be eighteen or older, diagnosed with a terminal disease that will end your life within six months maximum, etc, (Physician Assisted Suicide). There are many benefits from assisted suicide, and it should be legalized in more states.

The matter of assisted suicide goes farther than just a decision. It involves medical standards that were put in place and should not, under any circumstances, be violated. These medical standards can

A topic that has been around for a while is voluntary euthanasia or assisted suicide. Our book states that “a person who is virtually certain to die within a given amount of time and is experiencing or will experience a lot of pain before he or she dies should be able to choose an earlier, les painful death (Mosser, 2013). There are reasons that arise or illnesses that occur that should be reason enough for a person to choose if they want to continue to suffer through the illness or the pain or if they should instead be able to decide if they wish to continue this unhappy existence that they are faced with. Everyone should have a right to end their life when they see fit, especially if they are suffering or perhaps they feel that those around them are suffering because of seeing the pain they are going through. This brings us to the utilitarian few of the world and how sometimes assisted suicide or voluntary euthanasia can be associated with utilitarianism and the view that actions should be done for the greater good or the good of many. When looking at the pain that someone else’s pain can cause to others, the best course of action could be to allow the assisted suicide to occur. Others would think that any sort of assisted suicide it’s not an acceptable course because we are taught that no one should take the life of another because it is morally wrong.

There is a very controversial ethical dilemma in the realm of medicine. It is the ethical rock bottom to some, while for others it marks an escape from their doomed state. This controversial topic is called “Physician-Assisted Death”, also sometimes referred to as “Assisted Suicide”. This issue is often an emotionally charged one, as many patients who request this type of service are terminally ill and wish to die peacefully, without pain, and with their dignity intact. Assisted death is not however legal for anyone who is not terminal, “if someone has a chronic illness that is not terminal, that individual is not eligible for assisted suicide under any proposal in the U.S., nor under the Oregon Death with Dignity Act.” (Golden, 2014) Many requests for assisted suicide are usually for one of the following reasons: “Being afraid of what the future may hold, experiencing burnout from unrelenting disease, having the wish and need for control, experiencing depression, or experiencing extremes of suffering, including refractory pain and other symptoms.” (Pereira, 2011)

The quote above is important for it states that it takes a lot of courage to decide to die and no matter what the law states it still takes a ton of courage. “There are few complex, emotional issues in this country that can claim such a national consensus”(Warren). The previous evidence is important for it shows how much of a controversial issue euthanasia is within the legal terms.

One may argue that assisted medical suicide is the same as taking a gun and blowing your own brains out. However, for those who may have watched a family member battle a disease such as cancer that destroys the human body, they may understand the point of assisted suicide and accept it as being ethical. In this essay we have examined ideas from both sides of this ethical dilemma and in the end it is up to each person to decide what is ethically and morally right for them.

Walking down the cold, dimly lit hallways of one of the largest military hospitals in the United States listening to the coughing, moaning and sometimes crying coming out of the terminally ill patients rooms. I have watched many patients that I have personally cared for suffer a great deal during my time as a paramedic. During that span I have wondered and questioned why someone of their own free will not choose to end their own suffering. Working in this environment gave me some insight as to what others felt about the subject. One quote that has always stood out to me is “People want the right to die at a time of their own choosing. Too many families have watched helplessly as a relative dies slowly, longing for death”. (Toynbee) Some Doctors and nurses are totally against the idea while others support it. Let’s look into some of the reasons why assisted suicide should be a right for everyone.

To be given the right to die, when alternatively one could continue to live under the support of medical aid, conflicts with the right of a state over that of an individual. The question the state has to answer is, do people have a right to choose death? More in particular,