Prior to 1905 the average Russian industrial employee had an average working day of 11 hours. Most of these workers faced very difficult conditions on a daily basis with little concern being shown for their safety and well-being, which led to much unrest. Many tried to create trade unions, however, this was almost always prevented by the owners of the factories. In 1903, Father Gapon (a priest) formed the Assembly of Russian Workers, and within the space of a year it had more that 9,000 members. [Simkin. J. (1997). 1905 Russian Revolution. Available: http://spartacus-educational.com/RUS1905.htm. Last accessed 16th September 2015.] This essay aims to evaluate how important Bloody Sunday was in relation to the 1905 Revolution and will discuss …show more content…
On this day Father Gapon led a group of workers to the Tsar's Winter Palace in a peaceful march to present a petition to the Tsar in which they demanded better working conditions. Their demands included an 8 hour day, a minimum wage and freedom of speech and press. This shows us that the workers were tired of the conditions they were facing, and they wanted reform. However, during the peaceful protest the guards of the Winter Palace began to open fire, killing around 200 and injuring around 500. [Dawson. J. Class notes on the 1905 Revolution. Last accessed 16th September 2015.] This was important as it would have encouraged many Russians who were dissatisfied with the previous regime to revolt as they felt as though they were being let down and attacked by the "Little Father" who they were sure would have sympathised with them. By the end of January 400,000 people were on strike in response of the murder [Dawson. J. Class notes on the 1905 Revolution. Last accessed 16th September 2015] and terrorist acts became common as Russia descended into anarchy. This was important as it shows us that Tsar Nicholas II was now at war with his own people. Overall, Bloody Sunday was definitely an important factor as it started a chain of events that are now known as the 1905 revolution. Historian Orlando Figes argues "The revolution had been truly born. In one vital moment the popular myth of a Good Tsar had been completely destroyed." However, Bloody Sunday only started the series of events, other factors such as the Russo-Japanese War had a much greater
This led to instability in the government and resulted in people seeing reformist groups as an easy way to create change. And therefore people resulted in violence and uprisings put pressure on the Tsar creating a tense revolutionary ready Russia.
The entire economic structure of Russia appeared to be fully dependent on industrialization. In Document 1, a Russian finance minister presents the facts that the Russian empire is making a great transformation and that the industrial and commercial systems must be carried strongly in order for Russia to catch up with other countries economically. The details of how the production and trading of goods are so imperative makes you understand how hard the people of the industry have to work to make all of this possible. Further confirming this observation, Russian workers claimed they would rather die than live the kind of life they lived in Document 4. In Document 4, a Russian socialist witnessed a workers’ meeting during a strike. Quotes from workers like “our suffering has gone beyond all measure,” demonstrated the horrible conditions employees worked in. Another piece of evidence comes from Document 7. In Document 7, a Russian physicist analyzes the women employment in factories. It is said that they worked insane hours and were paid unjust amounts. Women who asked for a raise were just laughed at and disregarded. Within this same document it is revealed that there were children being physically forced into performing intense labor. In proving this unfair treatment, a document from an emperor or prominent political leader could be very beneficial in explaining how things were truly run in factories. However, in the end these documents serve as sufficient evidence that industrial work in Russia was not
After bloody Thursday union workers only grow stronger and banned together to fight for better rights for workers. John L. Lewis “Labor and the Nation,” proved what happens when people stick together and that there is strength in numbers. Men of the steel industry went through hell just for trying to organize workers to bargain for better rights “companies filled their plants with industrial spies, assembled depots of guns and gas bombs, established barricades, controlled their communities with armed thugs, leased the police power of cities and mobilized the military power of a state to guard them against the intrusion of collective bargaining within their plants”(Lewis 3). A lot of time strikers were beaten and killed for striking but that did not deter workers for fighting for better rights and unionizing. While the steel workers were being beaten the Committee of Industrial Organization was beginning to make strides in the right direction, many companies and plants began to negotiate practical work agreements (lewis 3). The steel workers sacrificed for the greater good of all workers just as the women in Flint Michigan did and the Maritime
About 300 people were killed, and hundreds more were wounded. As the news of "Bloody Sunday" spread, the Russian people were horrified. They responded by striking, mutinying, and fighting in peasant uprisings. The Russian Revolution of 1905 had begun” (Passage 1). He took no action when all of this was happening, but he did “after several months of chaos” (Passage 1). Czar Nicholas came up with a policy that did in fact end the Russian Revolution. He came up with the “October Manifesto,” which said that they were granted “individual right and created a Duma, or Parliament” (Passage 1). This was convincing to the Russian people and it ended the 1905 Russian Revolution. Czar Nicholas was still the absolute leader of Russia. Many people were not excited to hear this news, because he was not a great leader. He listened to the advice of his German wife that no one trusted. He also had another close companion “the
The 1905 revolution can be considered as the pinnacle event that accelerated the downward spiral of Tsar Nicholas’s rule and Russia’s adherence to their “little father”. From this point onwards Nicholas was referred to by the people as not their “little father” but “Nicholas the Bloody”. "The present ruler has lost absolutely the affection of the Russian people, and whatever the future may have in store for the dynasty, the present tsar will never again be safe in the midst of his people." (The American consul in Odessa). This revolution was an uprising of people from all levels of society and was not an uprising organised by any group in particular. The Bolsheviks played a minimal role in the 1905 revolution as most of their leaders were living in exile and their impact and influence on the workers in that year was weak as well as having no Duma faction. This demonstrates that the Bolsheviks had a minor role in the pinnacle events that led to the downfall of the Romanov dynasty but rather gained support after Nicholas’ abdication.
The war is an event that is widely considered to be a cause of the outbreak of the February 1917 revolution, despite in 1914 it appearing as though the Tsars’ power and authority had increased. This is because after Russia losing the First World War, many problems had been worsened such
With over a century of military and civil discontent the Romanov Dynasty was bound to fall sooner or later. The fall of the Romanov Dynasty was a result of long-term causes including Tsar Alexander’s inability to satisfy his people and Tsar Nicholas II’s inability to rule to throne all together. The collapse was also an outcome of immediate causes; the effects of World War One on Russia and the 1917 revolution. All long-term and immediate cause played a crucial role in stirring the nation until Russia was clearly overdue to be overthrown.
Architectural buildings around the world make up one factor of the beauty and culture of each country. The Winter Palace is an incredibly beautiful architectural building in St. Petersburg, Russia. The Winter Palace consists of great importance politically, culturally, and symbolically in the city’s third century. In 1708, the Winter Palace was first built as a wooden house with a Dutch style to be the Imperial residence of Peter the Great and his family. In 1711, the wood was replaced by a stone building. However, in 1731 Francesco Bartolomeo Rastrelli was assigned to reconstruct the palace into a much larger and newer design. The third reconstruction of the palace was completed in the year of 1735. Nevertheless, it only lasted 17 years before Rastrelli was asked again to expand the building even more. Two years later, he decided to completely rebuild the Winter Palace after the confirmation of the empress. (saint-petersburg.com) Ratrelli’s designs for the exterior were in a Baroque style, which have remained the same till this day. (about-eastern-europe.com)
The Russian Revolution was a series of two revolutions that consisted of the February Revolution and the October Revolution. The February Revolution of March 8th, 1917 was a revolution targeted and successfully removed Czar Nicholas II from power. The February Revolution first began to take place when strikes and public protests between 1916 and early 1917 started occurring. These strikes were created to protest against and to blame Czar Nicholas II for Russia’s poor performance in WWI and severe food shortages that the country facing. Soon, violence between protesters and authorities began to escalate, and on February 24th, 1917 in the city of Petrograd, hundreds of thousands of male and female workers flooded the streets. They all had the same purpose which was to protest against the “Great War” and the monarchy. The protests began to escalate and the vastly outnumbered police were unable to control the crowds. When news of the unrest reached the czar, he ordered the military to put an end to the riots by the next day, and on February 26th, 1917, several troops of a local guard regiment fired upon the crowds, but however many soldiers felt pity and empathy for the protesters than the czar, and on the next day, more than 80,000 soldiers join the protest even directly fighting the police.
This demonstrates that since the stress of waging war was tremendous, it should be no surprise that the first war could be a primary cause of the Russian Revolution. Moreover, the major powers of Europe hurt Russia in World War I; yet, by 1917, all the combatants horrifically suffered from the strains of war economically, proving this to be a long-term cause. This was, to a great extent, considerable because the military defeats and social strains of World War I had created a crisis in Imperial Russia. Before, Russia had some military accomplishments and they were on their way to being successful. Nevertheless, their triumphs were not long-standing; hence, Russia was not able to be victorious due to the fact that Russia decreased in economy because of the limitations in Russia. Similarly, restraints included the shortage of food and the huge problems with getting the obligatory materials for the army during World War I, which shows that this was momentous. Along with Russia being defeated and having a scarcity of supplies, Russia also showed economic oppression due to the pressure in jobs workers faced.
Bloody Sunday was a big impact of Nationalism, what started out as a peaceful march of Petersburg workers marching to the Winter Palace led by Father Gapon turned out to be a nightmare. The marchers wanted to establish an eight hour work day, establish minimum wage, and assemble a constitution, while the marchers marched they was fired upon by Russian troops and several hundred marchers was killed. People believed that
The long term causes lead back to the time between the end of the 1905
The extract argues that the First World War was the most important cause in bringing about the February Revolution. According to liberal historian Figes, it was not only World War One that caused the Revolution but argues that “Nicholas was the source of all problems”. His lack of ability to lead Russia to victory during the war was undermined by his incompetence as a monarch, resulting in the abdication of both himself, his heir Alexis and the outbreak of revolution. While Perrie argues that “it was… key figues who persuaded him… to respond to the Revolutionary events”, Figes states that “For twenty-two years he had ignored the lessons of history, as well as the pleading of countless advisors.” Nicholas’ abdication of his own accord rather
However, Bloody Sunday which saw soldiers shooting as many as a thousand protesters in a panic, was a short term effect. It was just after a strike involving 111,000 workers and was responded by large numbers of troops to guard public works. Although Nicholas was at the Alexander Palace in Tsarskoye Selo, he was still heavily blamed for the deaths, perhaps unfairly as he of course did not directly order the soldiers to fire upon the protesters. It was most likely due to the soldiers’ inexperience when handling protests so they handled it as if it were a riot. Nicholas in fairness expressed his sorrow and grievances for those that died and was persuaded to appease the workers but failed to realise the seriousness of the situation as it led to the revolution.
“The power still has to be snatched from the hands of the old rulers and handed over to the revolution. That is the fundamental task. A general strike only creates the necessary preconditions; it is quite inadequate for achieving the task itself”(Trotsky). The ineffectiveness of the strikes can be found in the fact that in nearly every occasion the soldiers were ordered to shoot on the crowd, stopping the revolts and leaving the tsar as obnoxious to the situation as before. Also the peasants in the countryside suffered land-hunger due to the growth of population caused by the decreased of mortality rates. Backwardness was also caused by the “open field system”, which didn’t motivate the peasants to improve their machinery or seeding methods since their land would be taken away from them and redistributed when a member of the community died. Nicholas II was a weak, indecisive and obstinate ruler who, being very conservative and reactionary, used extensively the secret police (“Third Section”) and the army to suppress uprisings and political enemies. He alienated the intelligentsia and angered the liberals with his lack of political participation and exaggerated reliance on the Fundamental laws, which said that the tsar was appointed by god and was rightfully in charge of the country. As a response, the liberals initiated a banquet campaign that started in November 1904, and ended in January 1905 with the aim of making the tsar give