Why Is Burton Lang Still Alive

me to recall to your mind that time in which the arms and tyranny of the British Crown were exerted with every powerful effort in order to reduce you to a State of Servitude, look back I entreat you on the variety of dangers to which you were exposed; reflect on that time in which every human aid appeared unavailable, and in which even hope and fortitude wore the aspect of inability to the conflict…” (Banneker).

Though, that is not to say that everyone who stands up to the challenge can do what they wish to accomplish; it takes an extraordinary person to change the face of a nation at war. It is also easily forgotten that in the middle of wars, daily life comes to a halt for the citizens of that country, which often includes pauses in schooling. Sadly, Gbowee argues, “What’s the point of an education when one bullet can undo it?” (24). Gbowee shows her immaturity in a more subtle way around this time, because she is giving up instead of holding hope for things to get

In the tense times of today, it is easy to forget the maturity and courage of our nation’s heroes. Many writers and politicians portray war as a battle between good and evil, or as a fight for superiority. While this may be true, it is necessary to remember the

In the study of military history, historians at times use what is known as the “fog of war” technique with expectations of keeping away from the historians’ fallacy. In this approach, the actions and choices of the historical subject are assessed primarily on the premise of what that individual knew at that time and not on future developments that the individual could not have known. Fischer’s approach is a scientific-like “what and how” only approach and rarely fields the question of “why.” Fischer states that the “why” deals with the metaphysical issues that bring no definitive results. Fischer’s work shows that historiography can only be taken seriously if it is practiced according to strictly empirical procedures and can only be done by asking the correct questions and answering them according to the strict methodology of “historical logic.” The historian’s task is to solve problems, to ask appropriate questions and to seek answers by researching the information based on archival and other methods of research. Interpretation is inevitable, but the interpretation should conform to the

Although, their conclusions can still be questioned, they have applied intensive and through analysis to their material, widening their subjects and have given legitimate reasoning for their views. While Brown has proven how terms such as War Hawks can be misleading, Horsman has provided enough evidence to prove that the War Hawks did exist and has successfully defined the term War Hawk with greater accuracy than other historians. Both the essays exhibit how historians should be aware of the material they use and careful about their generalizations when explaining such broad

Not every man who 's fought in a war planned on doing so. In fact, not all of them even want to. It 's rare to find enough people voluntarily willing to lay down their lives for their country, so more often than not militaries used what we would call “citizen soldiers.” Citizen soldiers are exactly what they sound like, regular citizens taken from society and turned into people capable of serving in the military. Although it may seem obvious when plainly written out, citizen soldiers had vastly different experiences compared to career soldiers, and Stephen Ambrose attempted to pin down that specific experience in his book Citizen Soldier. Ambrose uses oral interviews from World War II veterans and other materials to explain the experiences of the common American soldier who served in WWII between D-Day and the eventual surrender of the German forces. However, when examining his book, it 's important to ask how successful Ambrose was in painting an accurate picture of this kind of soldier 's life during his service. Is the information he uses specific to the men who served in Europe, or can it also be linked back to the soldiers in the Pacific? This paper will evaluate his work by comparing it to oral interviews from WWII veterans both from the same areas that Ambrose 's veterans serve in and in locations not included in his work.

It was not enough in this reading to become the fastest, strongest, most handsome, powerful, or richest person. It was the acts perceived in war that were most important. In order to achieve

reveals the truth of the war as the author remembers the war after twenty one years and

The story of what Lizzie Borden could have possibly done to her stepmother and father is widely known, every aspect has been sensationalized, and every detail has been scrutinized beyond belief. Creators choose what they want to include, disregard, and draw attention towards to create their own possible outcome. But what Mary E. Wilkins did in her fictional interpretation, “The Long Arm”, was unique because she chose to let the story unfold in a completely different way. The story is set in a small town, like Fall River, where Sarah Fairbanks and her father Martin lived. Martin was murdered after a quarrel about a business deal with Rufus Bennett, but Rufus and his wife left town the morning of the murder. While the police only searched for a few days before they gave up, Sarah took matters into her own hands to prove to everyone that it was not her boyfriend, Henry Ellis, who Martin just happened not to like. A quiet seamstress named Phoebe who lived across the street from Sarah, the victim’s daughter, was the actual assassin. Phoebe’s dynamic with her roommate, Maria, takes on the “double” theme, where there are two characters, who are based off one person or idea, but one obeys the rules and succeeds while the other character rebels and therefore pays the societal consequences, in this case. Phoebe and Maria’s characters portray two versions of Lizzie Borden that were both played up during her trial. Maria embodies the innocent, feminine, and weak version of Lizzie that

In All Quiet on the Western Front, a novel by Erich Maria Remarque, the main protagonist, Paul Bäumer, enlists in the German army of World War I with his classmates. At the age of twenty, he knows nothing of life but death, despair, and fear. As the war unfolds and the fighting continues, Pauls true character comes out. The war shaped him into a perceptive, selfless, and trustworthy soldier who will fight for his country at all times. At the beginning of the war, Paul is very familiar with living a normal lifestyle. As time progresses, he becomes perceptive with life as a soldier and learns to forget prior knowledge he once relied on, and relying on basic instinct and everything he has been taught in training. Bäumer’s insights have reminded him that what matters is “not the mind but the boot brush” and prior knowledge can be forgotten because it “is not the intelligence, but the system [that matters]” (Remarque 22).

. . . despite the fact that the history specialists will tell, with expressive pen, of the fantastic developments of armed forces and of the deeds of the Generals, he will scarcely stop to clarify how the private officer was developed from the agriculturist, the assistant, the workman, the school-kid, and changed into the ideal, all-persevering, untiring and strong fighter, who seared his bacon on a stick and heated his bread on a ramrod.

We all, as a people who have not seen the real war, are left in a state of confusion and uncertainty, when it comes to think about the war times, without real information and impressions of the combatants. Of course, looking from the bigger frame, there is no any event that had demolished the valuable heritage of humankind. But if we get closer, “we cannot, indeed, imagine our own death; whenever we try to do so we find that we survive ourselves as spectators”. People often try to imagine a war, in which 18 years olds had been killed mercilessly for the sake of their land, mothers of the soldiers lost the piece of their hearts and women had waited for their beloved ones even if they knew that they will not come. We are the people who did not

Here Hanson is advocating a “history from below” approach to scholarship, focusing not just on the famous generals of the age, but also with the common soldiers

I knew I had to withstand the pressure, though, even if it meant I would look like a bum. Washington had commanded General Charles Lee to lead the troops ahead to attack the British. I will let you know now, it is definitely not the decision that I would choose to make if I had George’s command. He had never shown the capability to lead a military; He was always jumpy and anxious before battles. Still, instead of me, Washington selects Lee. I hadn’t realized it, but I had been prolonging my eye contact with the earth before me, unaware of the general grasping the reins of his horse with

For yet another, Gensburger was more interested in the contemporary construction of the past than the past itself, and therefore it has little to say about “historical facts” that were featured in works of previous historians. Instead, the book is a history of a history, weaving together foreign policy,