Why Is Cal Mccaffrey Unethical

There is no denying that news media is big business. The complete coverage of stories and investigative reports are certainly at risk with the rise of media as a business, rather than strictly a service to the public. Over the past few years, there have been a number of cases where television stations or news publications have killed news stories or forced reporters to slant stories due to pressure from advertisers or those in power at the news. This paper will attempt to examine the relationship between social responsibility and news editors, and apply ethical theories to explain what should and can be done. Should editors have the power to kill or slant stories,

Such examples include saying that the killer should be murdered, or having sympathy for the murderer, or naming names of murderer before he is proven guilty. Another real life example, is again the Jill Meagher case were people some were having bias views, such as some spinning the story of Meagher being a party animal,she had it coming. In particular to this case in this point in time, is code 4.3.8 where information about the deceit should not be broadcast before the family is notified by authorises. Also included in this is the ethical codes of radio Also overseen by ACMA (obviously different codes and principles), such as code 2 news and current affairs programs. Lastly Looking at ACMA laws which surround online news reporting, with similar considerations as listed above. In addition to this the reporter has the competing ethical vales of the public’s right to know, what is happening, and also to inform about violence that is occurring near that area for residents, and debate about the safety of women in Australia. Versus the ethical considerations of the codes, and possibly getting penalised, and families

The three ethical news values I feel relatesshe best to the story are community, reciprocity, and equity (ME,35-36). Community is very relevant throughout because Johnson turned to his community for support and a voice. He felt it was their right as citizen’s to know what was happening in their local paper. Reciprocity, another ethical news value was something that the Tribune Company lacked. They were so focused on making a profit they weren't considering the feelings of their employee’s or their reader’s, and on a level were disrespectful too the both. The third ethical news value that was prevalent throughout the story was equity. Johnson took it upon himself to make sure all employee’s received justice by making the story known to the

Considering the amount of pressure journalists are under these days, it’s foolish not to expect reporters and news organizations to compromise their values and breach ethical codes. The competition is too great. The demand for breaking news is too high. But by no means does that excuse journalists from acts of negligence and gross misconduct. It’s true that journalists and news organizations walk a moral tightrope, weighing the consequences of each of their decisions, but they still ought to be held accountable for their misdeeds. And even those at the top of the heap should not get a free pass. Such is the case with CNN host and syndicated columnist Fareed Zakaria.

When University of Florida journalism professor Mike Foley was called to the stand during the trial, he said that, “Gawker’s writers and editors violated the SPJ’s code of ethics when they failed to verify the source of the tape” and “reach out to Hogan for comment before publication or consider what harm publishing the tape might do to him” (Sterne, 2016). However, he then stated, “The ethics code is not intended as a legal standard. It’s a set of best practices to guide journalists in making ethical decisions” (Sterne,

Journalists who work with sensitive topics constantly have tough moral decisions to make. Not only do they have to worry about the concrete actions they take, but they must also consider the fallout of their actions. To put it simply, they need to make teleological or deontological decisions. Teleological arguments consider the fallout of one’s actions, for better or for worse, while deontological are based on one’s duties and do not concern the effects of them. When dealing with this rape scenario, one where a high profile suspect raped a woman whose name was released by the press, both teleological and deontological arguments can be made.

The election of Donald Trump as the new President, and his animosity towards the journalists and Press in general, has challenged the news media with threats, describing news as fake and calling journalists’ liars and terrible people. The documentary shows how Trump’s strategy corresponds to that of Thiel’s supporting the Hogan case and also the purchase of Las Vegas Review-Journal by Sheldon Adelson, a powerful business magnate and investor. The documentary spends a significant extent of time showing interviews of reporters at the Las Vegas Review-Journal, who reported the story that their own publication had been purchased by Adelson. Through this, Knappenberger highlights an alarming issue that threatens freedom and future of the

When reading certain editorials, like trash magazines or gossip columns I would question the accuracy of the stories they report. In my opinion, all journalists write to persuade the audience; in an effort to sell newspapers or encourage others to watch a particular news broadcast. Facts and documented sources are what make news creditable. On the contrary, I am reminded of an article written in Rolling Stone magazine about an alleged rape on the University of Virginia campus. Upon reading, the story appeared bizarre with the accuser stating her friends discouraging her from coming forward when the act occurred (Helber, 2015). The story was later retracted due discrepancies in the accuser’s story. If I am doubtful about the authenticity of information sent through media outlets, I will search for myself in order to be properly informed.

The Boston Globe did not previously cover the story due to the lack of content. Without enough credible sources and facts, the story was unable to run and was not up to the SPJ code of ethics.. According to the SPJ code, journalists must make sure to not misreport or oversimplify a story. Another ethical factor at play was the responsibility of a reporter to serve as a watchdog. Although this story, if published sooner, could have changed the entire course of the 2000 election.

Ethical dilemmas can cause a magazine quite a bit of grief. It is up to each staff and journalist to abide by a code of ethics, whether it is personal or outlined by his or her job, to maintain integrity. According to chapter 13, “The American Society of Magazine Editors, American Business Media, and Society of Professional Journalists offer ethical guides for consumer and business magazines.” All stress the concept of accountability and minimizing harm.

In conclusion, in my opinion the ethics codes for journalists are wrong and inflecting the whole profession of journalism. Many of journalist feel that they can’t be equal anymore and have to take a side while they covering and that inflect on their

Newspapers have traditionally been an important part of civil society, providing information to citizens, convening groups around events and issues, and serving as a watchdog against abuses by those in power. Going back to the Revolutionary War, newspapers have served to connect their community and relay information to those unconnected otherwise. Through the atrocities of the Vietnam War, surprise and indignation of Watergate, and the disgust of the Iran Contra investigation, newspaper reporters consistently broke stories that had national impact. Even the recent Clinton e-mail scandal was discovered by a reporter for the New York Times. (Huffington Post 2015) Circulation has declined throughout the last decade with the rise of the twenty-four hour cable news as well as the internet. Cable news outlets (as seen with both Fox and CNN) do not report impartially, however, and the internet is open to whoever can write a post. The journalism standards set by newspapers have been set aside and replaced by biased reporters and the random individual spreading their version of the news. Although traditional print newspapers seem to be on the way out, the role of journalism has never been more important. Newspapers provide an important role as journalists continue to be our truth tellers and truth seekers and, according to Plato, “…without them, humanity would lose its way in the dark.”

News Writing style Ethics Objectivity News values Attribution Defamation Editorial independence Journalism school Index of journalism articles

Journalists expose government corruption, systemic and societal injustices, business malpractices, human rights violations, and more truths that government and businesses would rather hide. Despite efforts to keep certain acts under wraps, it is imperative that citizens understand all motives and beliefs of those in power in order to be fully informed when fulfilling their civic duties of voting and partaking in political discourse. That is the media’s job, yet we are entering an era where popular opinion of the media is ever declining and leaders encourage silencing the free press that brings to light these pivotal issues. In my future, I hope to use a Bachelor’s or Master’s degrees in Journalism and Political Science to reestablish the currently wavering honesty and integrity in some areas of journalism that contribute to dangerous anti-media ideas. We need to protect our democracy by demanding honesty and transparency in government and big business, but this goal can never be achieved if our society responds to

Bradlee, B. (2014, October 22). In his own words: Ben Bradlee on Liars. Retrived from The Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/in-his-own-words-ben-bradlee-on-liars/2014/10/22/6236cadc-4a67-11e4-a046-120a8a855cca_story.html