Why Is Charter Schools Better Than Private Schools

Imbalance is the main contributor in the growing epidemic in education in the United States of America. The education system in the United States is flawed. The center of attention of charter and private schools at its peak, whereas public schools are left to fall apart and leave millions of students uneducated. Everyone, every kid deserves the upmost love and dedication, no matter race, gender, or family financial state. Public schooling is set in place for students and families that can’t ill afford private schools or are denied entry into a charter school. These charter schools and private schools are now prioritized due to the fact that education is more rigorous and prepares students to succeed in college. Colleges are now more tended to choose a private or charter school student over a public school student.

Public education has had a negative effect on students; it’s often because of the bigger class sizes, poor test scores, and high crime in the surrounding areas. Public schools need to revise their system to determine what’s the best fit for their student’s educational needs. All children who live in a school district have a right to attend a district school. Many parents would like more options and opportunities for their child, and would like to be involved in their child’s education. Charter schools are part of the answer for a better educational choice for children’s academic achievement. Charter schools have many successful methods and continue to pave the way for children’s education needs .

Open to all children, free of tuition, and does not have special entrance requirements, charter schools believe that children should have the opportunity to achieve at a high level. When creating charter schools, they focused on a desire to create greater flexibility for innovation within public education. It was hoped that successful innovations could be adapted to benefit public education more broadly. (NEA, 2017). Charter schools also, foster partnership between parents, teachers, and students in hopes of creating an environment in which parents can be more involved, teachers are allowed to innovate, and students are provided with structure they need to learn.

Charter schools are an alternative to public schools. Whether this alternative is a better solution to the public schools is the argument. Public schools can be just as creative as charter schools. Public schools are funded by our tax dollars, which ultimately the United States Government decides where those funds go. Education should be the last thing to be cut in the budget, but unfortunately, we the people do not have a choice other than the public offices whom we hope will do what they have said in their election speeches. Charter schools have come about to fill the gap that public schools cannot fill. They can gear their curriculum to student needs, where some public schools cannot because of funding cuts.

Why choose to go to Charter School rather than public school? Charter schools are public school of choice, meaning families choose for their children. Federal legislation provides grants to help charters to manage start-up costs. They create better educational opportunities for the students therefore they have higher expectations in teaching. Charter Schools and zoned (public) schools are tuition free but unfortunately not everyone can get in to Charter school, since it works by lottery. Everyone has the opportunity to apply and has a choice to attend Charlet School if the students are lucky enough to get in. Charter schools are more effective for three reasons: they have higher graduation rates, teachers are more prepared and devoted to their students, and teachers take a greater responsibility for their students as they compete against Zoned Schools.

Charter schools are aimed at giving parents and educators greater freedom to design an educational program aimed at increasing student achievement, accounting for greater freedom of contract between not only parent and school but also school and state.

Since the 1980s, charter schools have allowed families to exercise school choice, a practice that had begun a few decades earlier when parents preferred to control their children’s education because of religious views or racial prejudices. As dissatisfaction with the performance public schools grew during the late 20th century, parents called on government to subsidize an arrangement where children could receive adequate education outside of the traditional public school system. Thus, two major school choice devices emerged: charter schools, privately run schools that receive public funding, and tuition vouchers, which cover some or all of tuition at participating private schools.

Charter schools differ from traditional public schools on three basic principles: accountability, choice and autonomy. Charter schools are held accountable for their ability to educate students, management of finances and handle operations. If they do not meet the guidelines established by the charter they are closed. They give families a choice as to what school their children will attend. Finally, charter schools have more autonomy than traditional public schools. They are able to make their own decisions regarding curriculum and school governance and can focus on academic achievement instead of bureaucracy. (“Resistance Hinders Success,” 2004)

Charter schools are all the buzz in the media lately; they are what seems to be the sensible response to the path traditional public schools are heading, down the drain. However, charter schools still face many obstacles and issues, stemming from the fact that they are far less regulated than their public school counterparts. This enacts issues including lack of quality control, increased segregation, and severe misuse of funds. Likewise, charter schools are only going to become increasingly more competitive and higher quality if their closest competitors follow that path, meaning the most successful charters are the ones compared directly to private schools. Since charters are also attempting to make a profit, they will go to all extents, including discrimination to bring up the scores, and therefore gain more leverage in negotiating for more funds. Simply enough, the most logical and simple way to prevent charter schools from degrading in quality or becoming out of control is to put more regulation on them, while still allowing them to maintain many characteristics of an independent charter.

Charter schools are a great idea because they let the school teacher and communities to try a new way of teaching, and it gives the students a chance to develop under the new style of teaching. These schools are free from the rules and regulations that public schools are under. Which helps the teachers to come up with advanced teaching style that may boost graduation rates and create a higher rate of higher education enrollments. These new style could eventually be adopted by regular public schools. Also, students who may have education difficulties in low performance public schools can be more successful in a charter school system due to new method of teaching and encouragement.

For nearly a decades, charter schools have become the modern rival of public schools, but does the charter schools is the best? In modern society, people keep chasing the American dream; they want to achieve better life quality and higher education. As most people believe, education is a primarily way to train children all the skills which will need as adults to find good jobs and live well, but the nation have many different types of schools, such as private schools, charter schools, home schools, or traditional public schools. Therefore, when a kid is old enough to start going to school, it’s also a tough time for parents to make a decision to choose type of education system which they trust enough to hand over the children’s future. According to a source, when compare to traditional public school, although some of charter schools were “successful”, some were “troubled and struggling”, but most of them were “somewhere in between just like traditional public schools.”(Grace) .Therefore, in my opinion, the government should not convert all public schools to charter schools because charter school itself still exists some issues which may make education becomes worse, such as inconformity in school management system, under-performing in comparison to public schools, and teachers’ experiences.

Charter schools Charter schools, which are created and operated, by parents, organizations, or community groups are type of public schools that serve all students with free tuitions. Charter schools across the state are positively impacting students, resulting in improved achievement. There are many reasons show that charter schools serve students better than public schools and choosing charter schools to study is a good choice for both students and their parents. Charter schools are held accountable for student achievement by parents, authorizers, and the state.

Students in charter schools has their education results improved significantly compares to the others who are going to public schools. Charter schools, like public schools, receive public funding. These school are

Many charter schools are known for their rigorous programs that challenge students to fulfill specific requirements that are different from traditional schools. Charter schools also value the idea of cultivating students with a talent for arts, technology or music (Chen). Institutions such as charter schools may be viewed as open or loosely constructed based on the unique guidelines displayed in each school’s charter, but in reality this is untrue because the individuality of each charter is what allows each student to excel based on the personalization and attention given to every single student who attends. A charter school has the potential to reach out into the community and help children who are not able to fit in at a traditional public school and it may allow the student to learn from a new perspective. Any child is allowed to apply to a charter school and they are admitted on a first-come, first served basis or through a lottery. The decision is not made on race or sex of the child and there is a fair chance for every student. A charter school is a great alternative to private school because there is no tuition fee at a charter school which is run by the state. Operators of the charter schools are able to provide children with a school that will create new and improved services which are lacking in the public school districts (“Charter School FAQ”). A charter school can also help

Charter, public, and private schools all have the same focus; which is to educate the youth. Corporate sponsored schools provide the funding for better resources and equipment, as well as enabling programs to be available to students. Although corporate sponsored schools can affect what is being taught to the students and can promote their businesses, they still provide education to students. Corporate sponsored schools can upgrade equipment and teaching material and can fund school programs that would have been cut due to not being funded enough. Corporate sponsored schools can provide the essentials to a better education, thus being a better option between non sponsored schools and corporate sponsored schools.