Why Is Cloning Bad

Cloning is inhumane and unethical because it creates animals and embryos that will be used for painful research experiments. Additionally, a painful surgery is required to remove the eggs from the breeding stock and implant the embryos back into them. Also, a good deal of the animals that survive past infancy have abnormalities and health problems that include respiratory distress, brain lesions, metabolic problems, skeletal malfunctions, and

     As soon as you mention the word cloning, you are most likely to ignite a debate. This is because people are greatly divided on whether it's good or bad. A way to reach a conclusion is to look at cloning from ethical, risk, and religious perspectives. The reality is, cloning is unethical, very risky, and irreligious. The arguments I will make will hopefully convince you that cloning is not good for the future.

Animal cloning is happening in today's society, people are split on either side that it is a big step into human race future, or if it is a part of science that humans shouldn’t be a part of. Cloning is done by removing a cell, then transfer the DNA into the egg of a donor, the animal would then grow up to look like the original. Cloning by humans is not the only way to clone, asexual reproduction is considered cloning used by bacteria. Humans consider the fact that you have a twin means that you have clone. So there are the facts to take in that cloning has been happening for a long time and that it is also done naturally. The big issue on animal cloning is more on the fact that many birth defects can happen to the cloned animal because it is such a high percentage. Clones that have defects such as two heads or extra body parts do have a small chance to live to the adult age. On the other side humans see cloning as a way of survival, with testing done on animals we could look back into the past and bring extinct animals from it. Many home pets have been cloned properly to look like an exact replica of the original, but the personality is the key difference between both. With experiments we now know cloning can be beneficial in some ways, but there is always a draw back. Another con to cloning is that it reduces the diversity in genetics, since cloning is using exact genes it has the potential to limit diversity in the species, there may be a time where organisms will no longer breed naturally. But the con that most people think of is that one day, humans would be able to clone themselves. This scenario is more of a moral dilemma because it is not natural and goes against many people and what they believe in, the fear comes from the movies and books because no human has ever been cloned, and then the wars will start because the fear of death would no longer be there. This is all just one side of the issue, the pro side looks for advancements to benefit humans. Cloning can help produce the best animal population with healthy genes. This could mean that humans can keep endangered animals from becoming extinct, this also means that with the raw material

There are some people that have been very anxious with cloning because they believe it is something new, but in reality it was introduced in the 1950s. It started with cloning food and has moved onto cloning animals. It has been successful on many different cases and a famous one is the cloning of a sheep named Dolly. Dolly lived to be six and a half years old and she had six kids. People believe that cloning should be illegal but we believe that scientists should clone endangered or extinct species in order to preserve them, here’s why.

Recently the world has turned its attention to a new development in science, cloning. Cloning is defined as “the process of producing a clone” (Dictionary.com). This has become a big deal because the endless ways we can bring back extinct creatures. Such as, the extinct wooly mammoth, the Tasmanian tiger, and Quagga. With the endless ability to bring back animal from the past with DNA there comes a problem. With human DNA made available so easily science has come to the idea and process of making designer babies. A designer baby is a baby whose genetic makeup has been selected in order to eradicate a particular defect, or to ensure that a particular gene is present. A family gene might be a bad disease which a baby might get when born. Before this, cloning a baby was science fiction idea to people. It was never imagined or even thought possible, but now it is not. Scientist have already started to create ways to clone babies. With this comes the problem of how far should scientist go? This could be both a blessing and a curse.

If a person is in a situation in which they may have lost a loved one and are trying to replace them, therefore it is morally wrong for him or her to use reproductive cloning.

Today’s technology develops so quickly that many impossible things become true; the example is cloning technology. Cloning is a process used to create an exact copy of a mammal by using the complete genetic material of a regular body cell. Different from the common propagate, cloning needs only one cell and without sex. Cloning, as of recent years, has become a very controversial issue in society but cloning can have several positive effects for the well being of society. Many people in society believe that scientists should develop a clone human but many people and especially the government are against human cloning. Hundreds of

I believe that cloning really isn’t very ethical. I believe that cloning is almost like you are playing God. It is unnatural for a person to be able to clone an animal. I did some research online and found out that 95% of cloning attempts fail. This can give the new animal birth defects, physiological impairments, illness, and premature death. I believe that cloning animals is morally wrong and we shouldn’t be able to do it. Human cloning is illegal and animal cloning should be illegal also.

Should people not be allowed to clone animals? Some people see cloning animals as bad, but some people see cloning as a good thing. Cloning should not be illegal because it has great future effects in daily life, saving endangered species, and scientist can use them as test subjects.

Cloning is done when a cell is replicated by using asexual reproduction and turns out to be the exact same as the host. Most people believe that cloning is very harmful and weird, while some believe that cloning is good for the environment and, it helps the world become very successful. I believe that cloning is horrible because it causes large offspring syndrome, has a very high failure percentage, has unknown consequences, the economy is affected poorly, causes an abnormal population increase, makes a non-diverse population, clones are socially unaccepted, it destroys the value of life and family, it causes diseases to spread, it causes premature aging, provides security issues for people, and increases the abuse of cloning.

First and foremost, to argue a point on cloning, one must know what cloning is. Summed up, “cloning is the process whereby organisms, cells, or microorganisms are copied to produce an almost identical genotype.” (Adam Fox) Potentially cloning makes us one step closer to immortality and a perfect world. But honestly, isn't that what Hitler wanted to achieve? Didn't Hitler want to kill all of the jews because he thought they had wronged the country, and keep all of the “perfect people”? Cloning people is making a copy of another person. A movie called “the island” sums up perfectly to what it is was like being a clone. Scientists are working on being able to clone a person genics and making a copy of a person. It is crazy, right?

According to Judith A. Boss, author of Analyzing Moral Issues, cloning is an asexual reproduction process in which genetically identical individuals are produced (Boss 126). Two authors, specifically, Julian Savulescu and Leon Kass have very distinct and different points of view on cloning and genetic enhancement. Human cloning has become a significant argument that most people have a stance either for or against it. Cloning is allowed and occurs in our society today, but whether one finds it acceptable or not is a different point. People have their own reasons for being in favor of cloning or being against it, but there are some people who judge if cloning is acceptable on a situation-by-situation basis. I am strongly against human

The term Human cloning refers to artificial human reproduction, which Is the reproduction of human cells and tissue, or replication of a human thus making a copy of that human. Two commonly discussed types of theoretical human cloning are therapeutic cloning and reproductive cloning. To summarize the therapeutic cloning is the process where nuclear transplantation of a patient’s own cells makes an oocyte from which Immune-compatible cells (especially stem cells) can elicit transplants(Farina, A, 2014). Moreover, These cells are stimulated to divide and grow in a petri dish rather in the uterus. However, therapeutic cloning would involve cloning cells from a human for use in medicine and transplants, and is an active area of research, but is not in medical practice anywhere in the world, as of April 2017. Two common methods of therapeutic cloning that are being researched are somatic (relating to the body, moreover as distinct from the mind)-cell nuclear transfer and, more recently, pluripotent (capable of giving rise to several different cell types) stem cell induction. Finally, the second type of cloning is reproductive cloning and involves making an entire cloned human, instead of just specific cells or tissues. Human cloning will one day be possible as a new tool called CRISPR- is already being used to edit the genomes (the haploid set of chromosomes in a gamete or microorganism, or in each cell of a multicellular organism) of insects and animals. Essentially a very sharp

To continue the downsides of stem cell research, human cloning is yet another major controversial topic within stem cell research. When it comes to the human cloning issues, one must look at the two types of cloning. Reproductive cloning involves creating an animal that is genetically identical to a donor animal through somatic cell nuclear transfer (Hollowell). In reproductive cloning, the newly created embryo is placed back into the uterine environment where it can implant and develop. Therapeutic cloning involves the removal of a nucleus any cell of the body and transfer it by injection into an unfertilized egg. “Proponents say that reproductive cloning is a logical extension of infertility treatments, hence the intimate link to IVF procedures” (Hollowell). The biggest issue is that therapeutic cloning is closely related to reproductive cloning, but they both have different purposes. Reproductive cloning involves creating a baby, while therapeutic cloning involves creating new stem cells. However, therapeutic cloning is better equipped for stem cell research and thus it is ultimately good. Because both could use stem cells, cloning is another controversial topic associated with stem cell research. This comparison can be made because somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) can be used to treat diseases in any body organ or tissue by replacing damaged and dysfunctional cells. SCNT can increase the speed of recovery and allow for the safe regeneration of body tissues and

For me to strongly argue against the idea of cloning, there must be an understanding of what exactly it is and the process in which it works. Simply, a clone is a duplicate or genetically identical individual. “The first step of DNA cloning is first to isolate its chromosomal sequences of a single DNA molecule. After this step the DNA clone can be electronically labeled and used as a probe, to further isolate the chromosomal sequence. These chromosomal sequences will represent the whole gene. This process will produce new sets of cloned cells identical to the mother cells. The new set of identical cells are then isolated, and the process is repeated all over again until a complete organ is formed. From this process the resulting baby is genetically identical to the original donor.