Why Is Disobedience Important To Society

Oscar Wilde believed rebellion was necessary for social progress and confided in disobedience being an essential human trait. In order to experience modification, you rebel against the discriminating laws that bring problems to you and your people. Furthermore, when awareness is given to an issue, there is extensive social progress being taken place.

Disobedience has promoted social progress various times in the past by allowing people to speak up against an unjust government. For example, Henry Thoreau in “Civil Disobedience” brought up the role of disobedience in the American Revolution when he stated, “All men recognize the right of revolution… to resist, the government, when its tyranny are great and unendurable” (Thoreau 3). Consequently, disobedience was necessary in the American Revolution in order for the colonists to gain independence from the British government, after all the unjust treatment that the colonists endured, such as excessively high

Disobedience is an important force in our society and helps bring about necessary social progress because it will lead to superior lives for its citizens. Oscar Wilde believed that through disobedience there is man’s original virtue. He asserts that civil disobedience promotes social progress. I agree with Wilde's belief because looking throughout centuries, society has shown a variety of situations with the act of practicing disobedience,and have achieved their goal.

The human race doesn’t take injustice lying down. Over the past hundred years, there has been many examples of people taking a stand for their own rights and freedoms through acts of civil disobedience, defined as “the refusal to comply with certain laws or to pay taxes and fines, as a peaceful form of political protest”. While a quick glance at today’s society does show a much more accepting and proper view of people of every race, religion and sexuality, our world does not come without its injustices. I believe that these major injustices keep civil disobedience extremely relevant in our current, modern world.

The students were suspended and told not to come back unless they didn’t wear the armbands. They complied, but their parents took the case to the Supreme Court, claiming a violation of First Amendment rights, specifically freedom of speech. On February 24th, 1969, “the Court ruled that the First Amendment applied to public schools, and school officials could not censor student speech unless it disrupted the educational process,” ("Tinker v. Des Moines - Landmark Supreme Court Ruling on Behalf of Student

The District court dismissed their claims on the basis that through student protest, the students would be a disturbance to learning within their schools. After the dismissal of the District Court, the case was taken to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit, in which the justices were split. The slit decision of the Court of Appeals resulted in the standing of the District Courts ruling. Since the U.S. District Court’s decision continued to stand, the Tinkers and Eckhardt’s were forced to appeal to the Supreme Court directly. The case reached the Supreme Court on November 12th, 1968. Within the Supreme Court, the question of “Does a prohibition against the wearing of armbands in public school, as a form of symbolic protest, violate the students’ freedom of speech protections guaranteed by the First Amendment?”. This question was decided upon on February 24th, 1969. In a 7-2 decision, the Supreme Court sided with the students claiming that by suspending the Tinker’s and Eckhardt for wearing armbands, Des Moines District violated the students First Amendment rights. The high court agreed that student’s free rights should be protected stating “students don’t shed their constitutional rights at the school

Without people being disobedient, they would not rebel at all. The USA would not be what it is today without the American revolution. The American revolution happened because of disobedience, and the people wanted change from being completely ruled by Britain. Disobedience is refusing to follow rules or a

The term disobedience can be interpreted differently depending on how someone looks at it. Martin Luther King Jr. for instance once said: “one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws”. A moral responsibility, to not only respect someone's action but to respect it even if it's disobeying the law that they believe are unjust. Which this portrays that everyone has a voice and it should be heard no matter what. Society should not be the judge because of our voices.

Sometimes all it takes is a guy like David to provoke society to defeat Goliath. Throughout history there have been multiple examples of the power of civil disobedience and how it can be used as an instrument for change and the greater good. Ancient philosophers even came to terms with an example being Socrates of Athens. His beliefs have carried through time, and the concepts of civil disobedience have been used to create the play The Just Assassins. Even in todays western society we still reap the benefits of such concepts as is proven when Martin Luther King Jr. took a stand against westerns laws to amend the constitution intern giving African Americans basic human rights. Civil disobedience is a powerful instrument in society used

A common argument amongst many citizens in America is whether or not peaceful resistance, or civil disobedience positively or negatively impacts a free society. With numerous examples of civil disobedience occurring in the past, it is easy to see how America was affected by these acts. America has progressed since her founding, especially since people have started to take a stand in what they believe in. Civil disobedience can positively affect a society through making others aware of an issue and sparking an urge for change.

Peaceful resistance to a law is exactly what a free society needs in order to manage the "free" status. If we were forced to obey every law without a say, we would not be a truly free society. Civil disobedience is one of the most positive impacts the people can have on their own government, especially one that claims to be one of the people, for the people, and by the people. When the people disagree with a law they have always and will always have a right to stand against it. It is a vital part of an American's first amendment rights: the freedom of speech (among other things).

Civil Disobedience can positively effect our society. If people blindly follow laws then the government has free reign to take advantage of the people under its jurisdiction. If no one stands up to fight when an individuals or a groups freedom is being taken advantage of then our political system has failed. They have a right, even if they are in a minority, to stand up for themselves and protect their liberties that are protected under the Constitution. "When the power is once in the hands of the people, a majority are permitted, and for a long period continue, to rule is not because they are most likely to be in the right, nor because this seems fairest to the minority, but because they are physically the strongest."

Civil disobedience positively impacts society. I suppose that depends on what you feel is unfair. For instance my mom has given me the freedom to make judgment calls on my own at the age of 16 whereas my brother who often didn't make the best choices wasn't granted this freedom until he was 18 I being 16 had bought myself a car kept a job and passing grades balancing all this i still managed to make time for my family and a girlfriend. To my brother this freedom i have earned was unfair after all, he was older why did his younger brother get more privileges than him? To him it was that our mom just liked me more and to protest he continued to do what he wanted behind or mom's back. This path of irresponsibility on his part put more pressure

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society because it empowers the people to speak out, it serves as a reminder that government is in the hands of the citizens, and it is the courageous way to publicize one’s opinion without violence. The evidence of the positive impact of Civil Disobedience is deep in the roots of American History, written on the sweaty brows of the feather-bedecked Patriots hoisting tea overboard in Boston; and sung in notes of the song, “We Shall Overcome”, by protesters being beaten and arrested at Selma. The very founding of America was an act of Civil Disobedience, as our forefathers penned the Declaration of Independence, defying Britain’s law and control. Over and over throughout history, groups have

In a “free” society, civil disobedience has been a part of human history more than once. The question is: does it impact society positively or negatively? The answer is: positively. In defense of many human lives under unfair laws and acts, it takes strong, willful people to stand up to higher authority, and for themselves. Think about it, without the work of the civilized courageous protesting, how would citizens in a society make the world they live in better, for future generations of life? The peaceful resistance brings the non-violence fight for change that the people deserve, and shows the present generation the struggles of past societies.