Why Is Donald Trump's Extensive Distaste For Political Correctness

The “Politically Correct” movement’s purpose is to bring historically condescending terms, offensive music and art, and controversial educational content to an end and replace them with more positive and less-offending references. Offensive and demoralizing efforts are wrong, but the censorship and deletion of words and phrases that do not contain the intention to demoralize are taking political correctness too far. Politically correct (or “PC”) antics have created a social decline that is growing worse with each generation, specifically regarding areas of art, education, language, and our right to freedom of speech; the degradation they have brought to the American psyche has even led to

On November 9, it was announced that Donald Trump would be president. This essay isn’t entirely about Donald Trump, but rather about one of the reasons why he was elected: he’s not afraid to “tell it like it is” rather than worry about being politically correct. One of the complaints from the millions of people who voted for Trump is that America is too politically correct, almost to the point that it infringes on free speech. Whether this is true or not is debatable.

Political correctness has become increasingly obvious in our daily lives. For example, the other day I attended the first meeting of the Frisbee Club here on the State University campus. During the meeting, we were discussing the fact we wanted shirts for this year, but we did not know what slogan to use.

For one thing, in the op-ed “Can We Start Taking Political Correctness Seriously Now?” the author Chait summarizes that the protesters in the student demonstration at the University of Missouri besieged a photographer. Most supporters on the left think that young people want to keep themselves from any offense, and they believe that political correctness only occurs on campus; however, the truth is that political correctness will spread beyond the campuses. Next, Chait compares the Columbia event to the New Haven scene. Both of them express doubt in the “political democracy.” Finally, the author claims that the political correctness is excessive on campus, and leftists cannot escape the problem of political correctness. On the other hand, in the op-ed “The Delicate Little Flowers on Today’s College Campuses,” the author Goldberg explains that the Yale riot is due to the reply of a caution to stop wearing Halloween costumes. Also, as the scientist analyzes, current college students are so delicate that they always think they are offended. Then, Goldberg gives us the conclusion that it is the problem of education rather than political correctness itself. At last, he visualizes that these students flow into the society with “emotional cocoon” in the future. Although Chait’s Op-ed shows effective self-presentation in his claim about the leftist ideology of the political correctness, Goldberg does a better job by providing concrete evidence in logos and pathos in

Have you been rude to someone today? Author Todd Schwartz of “American Jerk” would agree to think so, since his work supports the argument of Americans having poor standards with political correctness. The author’s tone, bias, and use of personal connections to his audience work consistently in an attempt to clarify his claims and invoke the claims of others on what the state of American civility really is.

President Trump exhibits similar traits, focusing on “bravado and branding,” according to Marc Fisher of the Washington Post. Plunkitt’s striking words help to contextualize the new leadership style in the White House, emphasizing the debate of the place of morality in effective political leadership. This debate extends far beyond business advantages, to crucial questions about Trump’s handling of immigration policy, gay, lesbian, and transgender rights, and his frequent use of racial epithets that are atypical for a President to employ. These focus areas are deeply rooted in ethical debates. Through Plunkitt’s writing, we can better understand the patterns of Trump in regards to political correctness and ethics. Moreover, we can debate the necessity of morality in our nation’s most prominent leaders and political

Jenkins, M. (2007, July). How Political Correctness Protects the Bad Guys. Retrieved September 12, 2017, from https://www.thetrumpet.com/3808-how-political-correctness-protects-the-bad-guys

In my opinion, political correctness could be seen as the antithesis of the concepts of freedom of speech and freedom of expression. It allows people to simply label anything that offends them or any subject they disagree upon as being politically incorrect. The beginning of this essay, Merry Christmas, is still a controversial subject

As the world around us has become increasingly politicized, between the rise, and election of Donald Trump and the shock of Brexit and many other events, it has become increasingly obvious that politics have become a much larger part of not only our daily lives, but the minds of the public. These various political issues have become extremely divisive, leading to separate echo-chambers existing and stifling debate and partisan politics. In the New York Magazine article by Andrew Sullivan entitled Is Intersectionality a Religion? he argues that one of these specific ideologies, Intersectionality, better known as Political Correctness, serves as almost a religion based on how they reacted to the controversy surrounding Dr. Charles Murray at Middlebury

Donald Trump. Besides evoking images of a surprisingly red tomato and greased golden locks, the Republican Nominee for President of the United States who has the approval of roughly 112 million Americans and the likely votes of over 152 million Americans, Trump’s persona is completely inseparable from one phrase that has been floating around in American politics for a while now: political correctness. This is a buzzword that is receiving an incredible amount of time in the limelight this election cycle. Everybody seems to be shouting it from the rooftops. Colleges and Universities consider it a prerequisite. Revolutionary professors take relish in making every effort to not be it. Democrats embrace it, Republicans disavow it. And, of course, Donald Trump is the political correctness anti-Christ.

Political correctness is a term which, in modern usage, is used to describe language, policies, or measures which are intended not to offend or disadvantage any particular group of people in society. In the media, the term is generally used as a pejorative, implying that these policies are excessive.The term had only scattered usage before the early 1990s, usually as an ironic self-description, but entered more mainstream usage in the United States when it was the subject of a series of articles in The New York Times.The phrase was widely used in the debate about Allan Bloom's 1987 book The Closing of the American Mind,and gained further currency in response to Roger Kimball'sTenured Radicals (1990),and conservative author Dinesh D'Souza's

Many disagree with the idea of political correctness, but many think it's unnecessary. In an interview with Face the Nation, our president, Donald Trump, was quoted saying that he "would be more politically correct, but it takes too much time." To me, and to many, that is just like saying that it takes too much time to be nice, or that it takes too much time to be a decent human being.

The idea of Political Correctness has been presented as a new way of progressing society and seeing that people learn "proper behavior". However, Political Correctness has only been seen in history as inherently fascist and restricts people's rights as individuals. The consequence of enforcing speech that is deemed harmless, is that all forms of opposition are silenced. For any thing to hold true it must be held under scrutiny; a truly vital matter for any progress to be made in the minds of any intellectual. We as a people will be stuck in the confines of an Orwellian echo chamber, with our ears only being subjected to the rants and ravings of cultural Marxists.

This has led to ‘political correctness’ itself acquiring negative connotations, and it is often associated with extremism and over-zealous attitudes. Examples of how political correctness has been derided include “aquatically challenged” to replace “drowning”, “spatially perplexed” to replace “drunk”, and even “provider of distributive, monetarily valued

Political correctness is a political ideology, nothing more. I believe political correctness is a political ideology and it cannot be correct unless it is linked to genuine transformation. First, I will examine the origins of political correctness to try to get a clear understanding of what this movement is. Second, I will show you that political correctness is political and how it became a political ideology. Lastly, I shall discuss why this ideology does not work.